ction they are headed
> .
> --
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack
PTL nomination, or the announcement that the team missed the bus.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The suggested way forward there would be to remove the "Security
>>>>>>>> p
our assessment Thierry and will support keeping the
Security Team as an official OpenStack Team.
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> ______
> OpenStack Deve
If you find an issue that could be considered release-critical, please
file it at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+filebug
and tag it *newton-rc-potential* to bring it to the Ceilometer release
crew's attention.
Thanks,
Dims (On behalf of Release Team)
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https
nd feature freeze restrictions no longer apply there!
Thanks,
Dims (On behalf of the Release Team)
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
nd feature freeze restrictions no longer apply there!
Thanks,
Dims (On behalf of the Release Team)
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
s now open for Ocata
development, and feature freeze restrictions no longer apply there!
Thanks,
Dims (On behalf of the Release Team)
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
for Ocata
development, and feature freeze restrictions no longer apply there!
Thanks,
Dims (On behalf of Release Team)
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
U
/+filebug
and tag it *newton-rc-potential* to bring it to the Sahara release
crew's attention.
Note that the "master" branch of Sahara is now open for Ocata
development, and feature freeze restrictions no longer apply there!
Thanks,
Dims (On behalf of the Release Team)
--
Davanu
s now open for Ocata
development, and feature freeze restrictions no longer apply there!
Thanks,
Dims (On Behalf of the Release Team)
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
strictions no longer apply there!
Thanks,
Dims (On behalf of the Release Team)
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstac
orking-ovn is now open for Newton
development, and feature freeze restrictions no longer apply there!
Thanks,
Dims (On behalf of the Release Team)
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Ma
; an excellent idea.
Also since "Release Stewards" are nominated by PTL, projects can just
start using this concept right away (as it's not an elected position).
+1 from me.
> One question, should "Release Stewards" also be members of the Stable Team
> for that project o
It sounds similar to what I
> know a few companies are already doing internally. It should help
> with continuity upstream, too, since the steward will work on a
> given release through its whole life-cycle, rather than handing off
> each time a new release cycle starts.
>
> Doug
__
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
ere frozen, this seems like the sort of thing we'd want to
> deal with through a patch release.
>
> I've already create the stable/newton branch for oslo.db, so we'll need
> to backport the fix to have a 4.13.1 release.
+1 to 4.13.1
Thanks,
Dims
>
> Doug
>
>>
>>
;
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.op
empt at virtualizing
> and cloning dims)
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstac
ck Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
_
>> >> busted is worth while.
>> >
>> > Right. I'm not advocating for testing every released version of a
>> > dependency. In general, it's good to test versions that have *triggered*
>> > changes though. If upgrading from 2.3.0 to 2.4.1 caused yo
tack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usag
r usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
Op
-tasks
Please feel free to look at the requirements repo, weekly chats etc to
get an idea.
Also if if you disagree, please bring it up in a community forum so
you get better answers for your concerns.
Thanks,
Dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
This issue was fixed in the openstack/os-brick 1.5.0 release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280522
Title:
Replace assertEqual(None, *) with assertIsNone in tests
To manage
_
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
&g
lease date?)
Thanks,
-- Dims
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote:
> On 08/01/2016 09:58 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> Thierry, Ben, Doug,
>>
>> How can we distinguish between. "Project is doing the right thing, but
>> others
re of external contributions to move to an
>> externally-governed project. I'm not sure we can use a strict deadline
>> -- some projects might still be single-vendor after a year but without
>> structurally resisting contributions. But being able to trigger a review
>> after some tim
Steve,
This thread has degenerated. So my request is to use Doug's post as
status quo. If there's disagreement then file for a resolution that
suits them
-- Dims
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/28/16, 12:30 PM, "Dav
ms,
>
> I personally think its the responsibility of the TC to resolve this
> problem via a resolution. That’s why we elected you folks :)
>
> Regards
> -steve
>
>
> On 7/28/16, 11:09 AM, "Davanum Srinivas" <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Zane, Stev
gt; what it means for a repository to be listed in the governance repo.
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Zane.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______
>>>>
>>>> OpenStack De
part
>>>>>>of
>>>>>> said official project), and the complaints look like a logical
>>>>>>attempt
>>>>>> to defend OpenStack from at least the appearance of openwashing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I belie
and our ops guys have to deal with something that
>>>> isn’t really an issue. They basically delete the queue.
>>>>
>>>> A bad scenario is when you make a change to your cloud that means all
>>>> your 1000 neutron agents are restarted, this cause
-
> -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-
;
> Action Item: Everyone please let me know what is your favorite mascot. You
> can either reply to this ML or discuss it in the next team meeting.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Hongbin
>
>
>
governance/blob/master/reference/opens.rst
>
> On 7/26/16, 11:15 AM, "Davanum Srinivas" <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>And. it's here in OpenStack:
>>
>>Look for fuel-ccp-* in http://git.openstack.org/cgit/ or the gerrit search
>>https://review.ope
-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subj
> removed.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Hongbin
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http
go:41] http: TLS handshake error from
> 182.74.106.3:37436: tls: client offered an unsupported, maximum protocol
> version of 301
>
> While Debugging the util.sh it get stucks at the call
>
> curl --insecure --user admin:fzZzkn18jGAv7Q66 --max-time 5 --fail --output
> /dev/null
Álvaro,
There is no plan for any other Nova driver that will drive a Docker
Daemon that i know.
Thanks,
Dims
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Álvaro López García
<al...@ifca.unican.es> wrote:
> On 08 Jul 2016 (10:07), Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> Tim,
>
> Hi Davanum
stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-containers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to google-containers@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-containers.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google
t; <amr...@tesora.com> wrote:
>
> Did not realize that; I withdraw my request. You are correct; 12 months+ is
> fair warning.
>
> -amrith
>
> P.S. I volunteered (in Ann Arbor) to work with you and contribute to
> nova-docker but I guess that's now moot; it'd have be
usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not f
/drivers.html#retiring-a-project
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
late to have this as a priority for
> Newton, though work can and should continue. But given how close
> we are to having the initial phase of the port done (thanks Victor!),
> and how far we are from discussions of priorities for Ocata, it
> seems very reasonable to set a community-wide goal for o
that topic to
> the next weekly meeting?
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316293/
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323567/
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323598/
>
> On 6/21/16, 6:53 AM, "Davanum Srinivas" <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>R
+project:openstack/oslo.messaging+NOT+is:merged+NOT+is:abandoned
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316259/
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
wrote:
> Sure. +1
>
> On 17 June 2016 at 02:44, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> At Austin the Release Management team reached a consensus to spin off
>> with some new volunteers to take care of the requirements process and
>
,
Dims
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-relmgt-plan
[2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/requirements-tasks
[3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/requirements-cruft
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
ease see here:
http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html
>
> Thanks,
> Neil
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.ope
Thanks a ton Jeremy!
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote:
> On 2016-06-11 21:08:14 -0400 (-0400), Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> Can someone nudge the banderstanch thingy please?
>>
>> Release in pypi:
>> https://pypi.python.or
Dear Infra folks,
Can someone nudge the banderstanch thingy please?
Release in pypi:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/os-brick/1.4.0
Error in Nova:
http://logs.openstack.org/40/326940/4/check/gate-nova-python34-db/bd55893/console.html#_2016-06-12_00_50_13_521
Thanks,
Dims
--
Davanum Srinivas
This issue was fixed in the openstack/nova 14.0.0.0b1 development
milestone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570748
Title:
Bug: resize instance after edit flavor with horizon
To
This issue was fixed in the openstack/designate 3.0.0.0b1 development
milestone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280522
Title:
Replace assertEqual(None, *) with assertIsNone in tests
, so please make it a priority for your project
to do so.
Any questions, please find us on #openstack-requirements.
Thanks,
Dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
--
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/m
t;
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/op
s (why
> are they special and not me).
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsu
nts team's purview
Please note that as we speak, a new team is being formed to take care of things.
So we'll do better with quicker reviews and reverts if needed. We'll also try to
figure out ways and means not to break projects inadvertently.
Thanks,
Dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitte
://etherpad.openstack.org/p/requirements-tasks :)
Thanks,
Dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
__
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/
nsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstac
;Unsubscribe:
>> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing
baseline versions
>
> For each OpenStack release agree a baseline golang version, and common
> version alignment on dependencies where appropriate.
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
Thanks Doug,
Folks,
Let's use #openstack-requirements channel
-- Dims
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2016-05-07 11:02:23 -0400:
>> Dirk, Haïkel, Igor, Alan, Tony, Ghe,
>>
sage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
Op
hone: (512) 286-5242Tie Line: 363-5242
> e-mail: fbari...@us.ibm.com
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstac
doing stuff in a couple of
months :)
Anyone else want to help, Jump in please!
Thanks,
Dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
__
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
_
-elements
weakrefmethod;python_version
xmltodict
==
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
(prometheanfire)
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/ma
___
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
___
nagement will be a hot topic:
http://peter.bourgon.org/go-in-production/#dependency-management
Thanks,
Dims
>
> Doug
>
> ______
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-de
u...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
u...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage question
>>>>> It presents a unified workspace for kubernetes alone
>>>>> Packaging without ansible is simpler as the ansible directory need not
>>>>>be
>>>>> deleted
>>>>>
>>>>> There were other complaints
Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap)
>
> MD NADEEM (mail2nadeem92)
>
> Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot)
>
> Jeff Peeler (jpeeler)
>
> Martin Andre (mandre)
>
> Ian Main (Slower)
>
> Hui Kang (huikang)
>
> Serguei Bezverkhi (sbezverk)
>
> Alex Polvi (pol
> concept of trust, I'd ask you to keep in mind we are a community working
> towards a common goal with common objectives, and to trust until given
> reason otherwise.
>
> [1]
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-newton-summit-kolla-kubernetes-underlay
> [2]
> h
service that abstracts one or more COE’s.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adrian
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs
how wrong I am. ;-)
>
>
> --
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack
witch/agent/ovs_dvr_neutron_agent.py#L189
> [5] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280595/
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists
Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2016-04-19 08:34:53 +0200:
>> On 2016-04-18 22:34, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Joshua Harlow <harlo...@fastmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Ok
translations:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Translations
So we can remove them
-- Dims
>
> -Josh
>
> Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2016-04-18 14:27:48
>> -0400:
>>>
>>> Josh,
>>>
>>&
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Joshua Harlow <harlo...@fastmail.com> wrote:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>
>> On 04/17/2016 09:15 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Oslo folks, Andreas and others,
>>>
>>> Over the weekend oslo.log 3.4.0 was r
://review.openstack.org/#/c/306846/
[4] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/tox.ini
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev
t;
>> For more details, please see below.
>
> Small correction, sahara-tests is branchless, like Tempest, and it contains
> tests which supports Sahara from Liberty upwards. How can this be highlighted
> in place of "part of the xyz release series" for the ne
This issue was fixed in the openstack/doc8 0.7.0 release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Python
Jenkins Developers, which is subscribed to Python Jenkins.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1526170
Title:
Python 3.3 support is being dropped since OpenStack
** Also affects: nova
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568820
Title:
Duplicate sections in generated config
>> ___
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
>> requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _
Hi,
I haven't heard back on this email from last week. So, trying with new
email subject/tags and cc'ing foundation ML.
Can folks who were there please respond?
Thanks,
Dims
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reading unoffici
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Diana Clarke
<diana.joan.cla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> To that effect, i am capturing stuff here:
>> https://davanum.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/new-to-openstack-r
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:10 PM, gordon chung <g...@live.ca> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/04/2016 1:26 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> Team,
>>
>> Steve pointed out to a problem in Stackalytics:
>> https://twitter.com/stevebot/status/718185667709267969
>>
>>
ot for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
___
):
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/303545/
What do you think?
Thanks,
Dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
mmit board meeting.
> Look forward to seeing everyone there the last week of April!
>
> Thanks,
> Jonathan
> ___
> Foundation mailing list
> foundat...@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/found
nstack.org/cgit/openstack/keystone/log/?h=stable/mitaka
If you find an issue that could be considered release-critical, please
file it at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+filebug
and tag it *mitaka-rc-potential* to bring it to the Keystone release crew's
attention.
Thanks,
Dims
--
Davanu
ut we're also planning to
>> >> >remove them from the official Mitaka page since there don't
>> >> >appear to be any actual related deliverables
>> >> >(https://review.openstack.org/300619).
>> >> >
>> >> >It would be good to und
used by Magnum, I think Magnum team has no problem
> to own it. If it is also used by other projects, I am afraid Magnum team
> won't have enough bandwidth to support it. In such case, it is better to have
> other teams to share the ownership.
>
> Best regards,
> Hongbi
than remove their -2.
>
> Doug
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
the new python package?
Thanks,
Dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
gt;
>
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?
301 - 400 of 13546 matches
Mail list logo
