Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:19:32PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
The man page netlink(7) refers to nlmsg_pid and nl_pid as process IDs.
This is completely incorrect. Treating them as process IDs can lead
to security holes. So please ask upstream to correct this as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:38:34 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.44-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Marko Jung|LinuxTag wrote:
Hi,
Also sprach Thomas Lange am 17.04.2007:
Are there any plans for creating a CD/DVD with etch for Linuxtag? Any
plans for making a Linux Magazin Spezial Heft with Debian?
LinuxTag is still looking for somebody who masters the official LinuxTag-DVD
this
Craig Sanders wrote:
i just don't see why people like to fool themselves that they're still
running 'stable' when they install stuff from backports. they're not.
Maybe the difference is that the overall system is still stable with
all of its benefits, but with only a few packages pulled in from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:47:33 +0200
Source: sendfile
Binary: sendfile
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1b-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
Klaus Ade Johnstad wrote:
On the page
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/editors/openoffice.org
there is a link pointing to http://openoffice.debian.net/ which seems
not to exist.
That's from the packages' description - contact the maintainer.
Regards,
Joey
--
It's
Runa Agate Sandvik wrote:
Hi,
I need a mentor for my Summer of Code proposal[1]. Please reply to this off
list
if you have any questions or want to help me out :)
[1]: http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2007/WebCleanup
I'm willing to co-mentor this, although you'll probably get a lot of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1270-2[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 28th, 2007
Sven Luther wrote:
Taking this to -project, since i am no more a DD.
Not sure if all readers here have the original. Sven has not been
expulsed and hence is still a DD.
Regards,
Joey
--
Life is a lot easier when you have someone to share it with. -- Sean Perry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1270-2[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 28th, 2007
Leandro Doctors wrote:
I am not the only one who thinks that there are problems regarding Debian's
web face. This issue has been adressed by two candidates for this year's
Could you name them?
My contribution to that would be a set of **suggestions** about it (and how
to implement it).
Holger Levsen wrote:
Holger (who's also a stable ion3 user. Or rather, have been.)
Isn't that an oxymoron qua author?
Regards,
Joey
--
The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
-- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Gustavo Franco wrote:
*shrug* Parse error, as I said...
Parse error, simple because you and I are not the target of the
proposed feature.
Hmm. That could have contributed to the parse error.
to be saner, IMHO. Just ask on debian-user. Btw, I though we wrote a
No. I'm asking on
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Actually, that's not a bad idea at all. There are lots of people in the
past who have suggested that that would like to change the layout a bit,
so why not give people a change to see what they come up with.
However, if we want to create such a content, I think it is
Gustavo Franco wrote:
PS: There are indeed some information which are hard to find. But
testing images are not affected!
Now I'm understanding why more and more people start new Debian web
pages with content that should be official instead cooperate with
debian-www mailing list and add the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1270-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 20th, 2007
Gustavo Franco wrote:
This sounds more like debian-website-overthrow than
debian-website-cleanup. I'd suggest maybe tidying up the design and
navigation and merging/splitting some of the content as appropriate,
but I'm not sure whether totally changing it all is a good idea. I
think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1270-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 20th, 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1269-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 18th, 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1269-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 18th, 2007
CVS User nori wrote:
Update of /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/mirror
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv20775
Modified Files:
submit.wml
Log Message:
Correct a place of a comma.
--- /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/mirror/submit.wml 2007/02/18 23:41:52
1.58
+++
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1268-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 17th, 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:55:10 +0100
Source: mailto
Binary: mailto
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED
Rob van der Putten wrote:
Package: mailto
Version: 1.2.6
Version: 1.3.2
Hi there
Mailto uses gethostbyname() to get the hostname;
/* Get the local hostname for later insertion */
gethostname(localhost, sizeof(localhost));
if ( index(localhost, '.')) {
Rob van der Putten wrote:
Hi there
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Martin Schulze wrote:
Please be more verbose.
Why should gethostname() not return the valid hostname of the host
it runs on?
If it doesn't return something useful, I'd expect /etc/hostname and
thus the hostname setting
Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 3/16/07, Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
(...)
On the other hand it would be nice to test something like that
anyway so people can perhaps use this method for other tasks
(redesign anyone ;) ?).
Hi,
Redesign and tests to move into svn? :-) I
Gustavo Franco wrote:
Re modern design and stuff: Please define problems with the current design
and propose improvements. This has been asked all volunteers who wanted
to apply a complete redesign of the web pages. The smaller the changes
the easier they can be applied and the more likely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1268-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 17th, 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:39:47 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.43-0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:35:59PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) [070314 19:25]:
Since then we've also had Debian Times established
I don't see at all how this is realated to you being DPL - in fact, I
would have prefered a more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:10:09 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.42-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:50:07 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.41-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
While we have the machines we need one monitor, keyboards, mouse, cable
stuff. Whoever has some of that - please speak up.
Somewhere from that area who has (one) TFT, a bit of mouse and keyboard
and cable stuff he can give us for the booth?
Well... since we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1265-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 10th, 2007
Marc Haber wrote:
Or are we going to require an IQ test before people allowing to vote,
understanding the ballot being one of the test?
Seconded.
Regards,
Joey
--
The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media. -- H. Peter Anvin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1265-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
March 10th, 2007
Package: openbsd-inetd
Version: 0.20050402-5
It seems that the postinst script of openbsd-inetd is not able to
grok a situation in which the package is already installed and the
server running. This is what I get:
finlandia:~# apt-get dist-upgrade -y
Reading package lists... Done
Building
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:55:41PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Hi all,
hylafax 4.3.2 has just been released[1]. This is a minor update but
fixes a few bug forwarded upstream and simplify the way Debian package
may be done. The more important fix is that PAM will
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libgsf-1 - Structured File Library - runtime version
libgsf-1-dbg - Structured File Library - debugging files (basic version)
libgsf-1-dev - Structured File Library - development
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
] I am really upset by the way the ARM build daemons are managed. The
] packages are not uploaded regularly, with sometimes three days between
] two uploads. [...]
]
] All of that resulted in ARM being the slowest architecture to build
] packages. [...]
Frank Küster wrote:
I don't imagine Aurelien's any less upset, but as far as I can see, there
aren't actual problems with the way arm's keeping up at present:
Another problem is that the buildd email mailbox is apparently piped to
/dev/null.
FWIW, buildd mail is processed by a
page. Martin Schulze [21]proposed to alter the menu even more.
17. http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2007/01/msg00116.html
18. http://www.debian.org/devel/website/stats/
19. http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2007/02/msg00020.html
20. http://www.debian.org/vote/
21. http://lists.debian.org
Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
On Monday 12 February 2007 09:08, Stephen Gran wrote:
[...] reproducibility will suffer. The fact that it failed to run the
binary correctly in this failure instance is good. But another day, it
may fail to correctly run gcc, and that would be bad if it exited 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:34:14 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.40-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
Note that if you can get SPI to transfer the debian.org zone to other
DNS servers than the current ones, you can NMU the infrastructure.
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heavily disagree to that. The current servers are owned by Debian or
sponsored to Debian by some people. So
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 04:24:45AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally, I don't like either of the checks, but I've seen zero
effort from Aurelian and friends to demonstrate they can be trusted,
Quoting
Julien BLACHE wrote:
Note that if you can get SPI to transfer the debian.org zone to other
DNS servers than the current ones, you can NMU the infrastructure.
But (probably) only if it was at the request of the DPL.
Could be at the request of the Project, via a GR I think, if the DPL
Julien BLACHE wrote:
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unlikely. SPI usually has a defined authorisationship with an associated
project, this refers to people, not the project as a whole or their
developers or their internal voting results. However, a GR should be
able to kick
Craig Small wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:36:43AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
Martin Schulze wrote:
I can't see a way of lprng postinst saying 'oh lpr is being installed'
and not deleting the directory.
I feared that...
Maybe lprng postinst can check when it's going from rc
Craig Small wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:36:47AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Purge means purge, but it shouldnt purge files/directories now owned
by another package. lpr/lprng are a special case I guess.
Hmm, yes I see the problem now.
So either lprng has to orphan the spool
Alexander Sack wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 08:36:56AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1258-1[EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1258-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
February 7th, 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1258-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
February 7th, 2007
Package: lpr, lprng
Version: 2006.11.04, 3.8.28dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
Installing lpr (by removing lprng) will leave you with no working lpr
package since /var/spool/lpd is owned daemon.lp with mode 700. It
should've been lp.lp with mode 2775.
Purging lprng afterwards will remove
Craig Small wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:19:51AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
2. lprng.postrm should not remove /var/spool/lpd upon purge
I cannot see the justification for this, purge means purge right?
Purge means purge, but it shouldnt purge files/directories now owned
by another
tags 402592 wontfix upstream
severity normal
thanks
After being pestered about this bug I've contacted Werner on this regard.
He told me that this can happen with all GNU utilities and is an inherent
feature as they all operate without fixed limits whenever possible.
For example, a user ID in
tags 402592 -wontfix pending
thanks
Martin Schulze wrote:
After being pestered about this bug I've contacted Werner on this regard.
He told me that this can happen with all GNU utilities and is an inherent
feature as they all operate without fixed limits whenever possible.
For example, a user
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
As time and GR's pass, the length of the navigation bar for
the vote pages keeps increasing. Considering that the list of votes
is getting long, and that the most recent votes/elections are now at
the bottom of the page, perhaps it is time to consider a
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Qua, 2007-01-31 às 09:21 +0100, Martin Schulze escreveu:
I seem to recall Keving mentioning a patent minefield, which I would
interpret not only as an area of computer science in which several
patents exist but also that they are tried to be enforced
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:10:47PM -0500, Bob Kline wrote:
The Debian home page (http://www.debian.org/) notes the announcement of
the Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0, and the page linked by
that note says The Debian project confirms December 2006 as the
merge 409147 409148
thanks
David Broome wrote:
Package: glibc
Version: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4
Severity: critical
Hello - tzdata in glibc for stable is based on tzdata2006b (from edits
in 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1), this does not have the correct PST changes for
this year for 4 Canadian
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:21:12 -0800, Kevin B McCarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Cognaxon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
we would like to donate our free small program called WSQ viewer
(for Linux) to be distributed with Debian CD/DVD. The short
description
merge 409147 409148
thanks
David Broome wrote:
Package: glibc
Version: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4
Severity: critical
Hello - tzdata in glibc for stable is based on tzdata2006b (from edits
in 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1), this does not have the correct PST changes for
this year for 4 Canadian
merge 409147 409148
thanks
David Broome wrote:
Package: glibc
Version: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-22sarge4
Severity: critical
Hello - tzdata in glibc for stable is based on tzdata2006b (from edits
in 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1), this does not have the correct PST changes for
this year for 4 Canadian
been offline for more than ten days.
Martin Schulze [47]added that the machine was being moved to a new
location. Steve Langasek [48]answered that this requirement has been
waived as a hard requirement for release qualification so that this
particular outage doesn't affect the release status of alpha
FYI
Gruesse,
Joey
- Forwarded message from Nils Magnus [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Nils Magnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: LinuxTag e. V.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:21:16 +0100
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [veterans] Call for Papers: LinuxTag May 30 -
Mike Hommey wrote:
To be fair, it's not exactly true, because upgrading from firefox to
iceweasel in debian means upgrading from version 1.0 or 1.5 to 2.0, and
there are substancial changes that some people dislike, myself included.
Which means Piotr is actually probably complaining about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1252-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
January 27th, 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1253-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
January 27th, 2006
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Heavens help us.
And this is the example of the kind of person working on a
social policy?
To be fair, didn't Manoj deny wanting to work on it?
Regards,
Joey
--
MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle
--
To
Sune Vuorela wrote:
- I am not a DD, so my opinions don't count
FWIW, that's wrong. Your opinions do count.
Regards,
Joey
--
MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1252-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
January 27th, 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1253-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
January 27th, 2006
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:50 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Please keep in mind that the upgrade path from etch to lenny needs
to work for etch r0 to lenny r0 as well.
So I've understood, but cannot back this up with any documentation.
Where is this documented? I'm
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
It has just come to my attention that there will be no upgrade path
from the version of Mailman in etch at this time (2.1.9) to the
version lenny will most probably have (2.2.x), but there will be an
upgrade path from the yet-unreleased 2.1.y, y9, to 2.2.x, and an
Loïc Minier wrote:
I mistakingly uploaded gnome-vfs2 2.16 to unstable; it bumps shlibs and
is incompatible with unstable's bonobo; it's not suitable for etch.
First, sorry for this mistake.
Second, here are the options:
- upload bonobo 2.16 into unstable and upload updates via TPU
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi,
as part of the spring cleaning effort of the listmasters, we would like
to close down several unused, obsolete lists. Before doing so we would
like to
a) give you the chance to veto against it
b) document our reasons and changes publicly
The following
Loïc Minier wrote:
Maybe I'm the only one wondering but: why aren't uploads announced to
the *-changes lists anymore?
Because it's -devel-changes? the -changes ones were meant for stable.
(these logs may be missing as well, though).
Regards,
Joey
--
The only stupid question is
Loïc Minier wrote:
I mistakingly uploaded gnome-vfs2 2.16 to unstable; it bumps shlibs and
is incompatible with unstable's bonobo; it's not suitable for etch.
First, sorry for this mistake.
Second, here are the options:
- upload bonobo 2.16 into unstable and upload updates via TPU
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
So the release criteria require buildd redundancy. And yet, half the
release candidate archs still don't have it. It gets marked in yellow
on http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html.
Well, the one-and-only alpha buildd has been down for apparently ten
Package: websec
Version: 1.9.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I was puzzled to have websec bail out on my configuration until
I reached the examples section of url.list. On the top of the file
the syntax was missing. Here's a patch to fix this. I'd be glad
if you could add it to future
Package: websec
Version: 1.9.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I'd like the manpage to document when new versions are fetched. Since websec
inspects the timestamp of an archived page and uses it in an additional HTML
header line for if-modified-since this should be written down somewhere,
Package: websec
Version: 1.9.0-1
Tags: patch
Hi,
there's a typo in the webdiff.1 manpage.
--- webdiff.1.orig 2007-01-12 10:46:03.0 +0100
+++ webdiff.1 2007-01-12 10:46:09.0 +0100
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ Don't ignore if token contains = given
Debug messages
.SH DESCRIPTION
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Dear members of the security team(s),
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 11:08 -0300, Alex de Oliveira Silva wrote:
Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in phpMyAdmin, which may
be exploited by attackers to execute arbitrary scripting code. These
issues are due to
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Dear members of the security team(s),
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 11:08 -0300, Alex de Oliveira Silva wrote:
Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in phpMyAdmin, which may
be exploited by attackers to execute arbitrary scripting code. These
issues are due to
Please use CVE-2006-5876.
Regards,
Joey
--
GNU GPL: The source will be with you... always.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please use CVE-2006-5876.
Regards,
Joey
--
GNU GPL: The source will be with you... always.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sebastian Feltel wrote:
Hello,
I just registered for an booth at the 2nd Linux-Informationstage
Oldenburg (14.- 15. April 2007) [1] for debianforum.de. Are there any
plans for an Debian booth too (Joey?)?
Because this seems to be an rather small event maybe we could share an
booth?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1246-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
January 8th, 2007
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1246-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
January 8th, 2007
Nicolas François wrote:
The following list contain all the coded character sets known. This does
not necessarily mean that all combinations of these names can be used for
the FROM and TO command line parameters. One coded character set can be
listed with several different names
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 17:29 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Now, if you don't provide us with the necessary data, we won't be able
to fix the regression it introduces in gnucash.
There are
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 17:29 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Now, if you don't provide us with the necessary data, we won't be able
to fix the regression it introduces in gnucash.
There are
I upgraded a machine from sarge to etch and the process broke over ssh :(
Here's the log:
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 100606 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking openssh-client (from .../openssh-client_1%3a4.3p2-7_i386.deb) ...
Transferring ownership of
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 06:11:28PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
I upgraded a machine from sarge to etch and the process broke over ssh :(
I believe this was fixed by 1:4.3p2-8, which should be allowed to enter
etch ASAP.
Cool! Good to know that this problem
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 17:29 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 01:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Now, if you don't provide us with the necessary data, we won't be able
to fix the regression it introduces in gnucash.
There are
Please use CVE-2006-6318 when referring to this NULL pointer dereference.
Regards,
Joey
--
If nothing changes, everything will remain the same. -- Barne's Law
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-3.2
I guess that the file /etc/apache2/mods-available/ssl.conf is missing
the statement Listen 443 to allow Apache 2 to actually listen to the
SSL port as well.
Regards,
Joey
--
A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems.
---
Debian Weekly News
http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2006/42/
Debian Weekly News - December 26th, 2006
---
Welcome to this year's 42nd issue of DWN,
Package: gnome-lokkit
- Forwarded message from Bill Ries-Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:55:27 -0800
From: Bill Ries-Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
Subject: bad link
X-Folder: debian-www@lists.debian.org
on this page:
401 - 500 of 7500 matches
Mail list logo