[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2055530] Re: Mutter (sometimes) fails to build with [fatal error: meta/meta-enum-types.h: No such file or directory]

2024-03-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected, Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2051074] Re: Mirror mode doesn't work when panel only supports one refresh rate with reduced blanking

2024-03-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Kai-Heng, or anyone else affected, Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2051074] Re: Mirror mode doesn't work when panel only supports one refresh rate with reduced blanking

2024-03-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Kai-Heng, or anyone else affected, Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2054510] Re: Incomplete screen redraws in virtual machines running Xorg

2024-03-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected, Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2054510] Re: Incomplete screen redraws in virtual machines running Xorg

2024-03-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected, Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2055530] Re: Mutter (sometimes) fails to build with [fatal error: meta/meta-enum-types.h: No such file or directory]

2024-03-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected, Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2055519] Re: Mutter rebuilds on jammy fail test: mutter:cogl+cogl/conform / framebuffer-get-bits (due to Mesa >= 23.1.1)

2024-03-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected, Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2055519] Re: Mutter rebuilds on jammy fail test: mutter:cogl+cogl/conform / framebuffer-get-bits (due to Mesa >= 23.1.1)

2024-03-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected, Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2055530] Re: Mutter (sometimes) fails to build with [fatal error: meta/meta-enum-types.h: No such file or directory]

2024-03-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected, Accepted mutter into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/42.9-0ubuntu7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

Re: Unresolved tomcat9 issue

2024-03-11 Thread Robie Basak
Hi, On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 06:17:17PM +0100, Troels Arvin wrote: > In https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/2047933 I have > raised the issue and also proposed a fix, but nothing seems to happen. Thank you for volunteering to fix this in Ubuntu! I see that you were already

[Bug 2056565] Re: [FFe] [needs-packaging] ubuntu-kernel-accessories seed and metapackage

2024-03-08 Thread Robie Basak
@p-pisati FYI. As soon as this lands and the new binary package is created, we'll be ready to add this Recommends to src:linux-meta* -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056565 Title:

[Bug 2056565] Re: [FFe] [needs-packaging] ubuntu-kernel-accessories seed and metapackage

2024-03-08 Thread Robie Basak
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+git/ubuntu-meta/+merge/462062 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056565 Title: [FFe]

[Bug 2055432] Re: [needs-packaging] Metapackage for performance engineering tooling

2024-03-08 Thread Robie Basak
This is awaiting AA accept from the Noble NEW queue. ** Description changed: + Specification: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/spec-include-performance- + tooling-in-ubuntu/43134 + As we raise the bar for performance management and optimisation we will publish a metapackage to make it easy

[Bug 2056565] [NEW] [FFe] [needs-packaging] ubuntu-kernel-accessories seed and metapackage

2024-03-08 Thread Robie Basak
team: please could you provide an FFe ack for the ubuntu-meta change as well as the linux-meta* change? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: Robie Basak (racb) Status: In Progress ** Tags: needs-packaging -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2056467] Re: No IPv6 Repositories in AWS

2024-03-07 Thread Robie Basak
This is a bug specific to the default repositories configured on/by AWS cloud images, so the cloud-images project is probably a more suitable bug target. ** Package changed: ubuntu => cloud-images -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

Re: Refine the firmware-updates exception

2024-03-07 Thread Robie Basak
Hi Mario, Thank you for caring for the fwupd package in Ubuntu! One adminsitrative question: fwupd is in main and the Foundations team are committed to looking after it. Is your proposal made on behalf of or in coordination with the Foundations team? If not, what's the Foundation team's view on

[Bug 2019997] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2019997] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2019997] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2019997] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2019997] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2021988] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello John, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2021988] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello John, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2021988] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello John, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2021988] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello John, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2021988] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello John, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2043836] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by

[Bug 2043836] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by

[Bug 2043836] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by

[Bug 2043836] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by

[Bug 2043836] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by

[Bug 2048921] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Grant, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2048921] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Grant, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2048921] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Grant, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2048921] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (30 -> 31) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Jammy, Mantic

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Grant, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2048921] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Grant, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2050022] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Ken, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2050022] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Ken, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2050022] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Ken, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2050022] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Ken, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2050022] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Ken, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 2055046] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing

[Bug 2055046] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing

[Bug 2055046] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2055046] Please test proposed package

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~22.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this

[Bug 2055046] Re: ubuntu-pro-client:3 duplicate log entry for /var/log/ubuntu-advantage-license-check.log

2024-03-04 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Heinrich, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/31.2~23.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing

[Bug 2055728] Re: update-notifier notifies on unactionable "Pro" updates

2024-03-01 Thread Robie Basak
Versions from my report: update-notifier 3.192.54.6 on Jammy. ** Description changed: I understand that, when informing me about notifications, update- notifier will tell me about Pro-only updates that I cannot receive unless I subscribe to Pro. Actual behaviour: However, I am also

[Bug 2055728] [NEW] update-notifier notifies on unactionable "Pro" updates

2024-03-01 Thread Robie Basak
Public bug reported: I understand that, when informing me about notifications, update- notifier will tell me about Pro-only updates that I cannot receive unless I subscribe to Pro. Actual behaviour: However, I am also receiving notifications that tell me about Pro-only updates when I am not

[Bug 2055432] Re: [needs-packaging] Metapackage for performance engineering tooling

2024-02-29 Thread Robie Basak
The performance-tools package is ready for review from: ppa:racb/experimental -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055432 Title: [needs-packaging] Metapackage for performance engineering

[Bug 2055432] [NEW] [needs-packaging] Metapackage for performance engineering tooling

2024-02-29 Thread Robie Basak
on the following packages: procps sysstat iproute2 numactl bpfcc-tools bpftrace perf-tools-unstable trace-cmd nicstat ethtool tiptop sysprof ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Medium Assignee: Robie Basak (racb) Status: In Progress ** Tags: needs-packaging -- You received this bug

[Bug 1876597] Re: package pure-ftpd-common 1.0.49-4 failed to install/upgrade: unable to open '/usr/share/doc/pure-ftpd-common/README.Authentication-Modules.gz.dpkg-new': No such file or directory

2024-02-28 Thread Robie Basak
** Also affects: pure-ftpd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876597 Title: package pure-ftpd-common 1.0.49-4 failed to

[Bug 2054219] Re: Debian installer segfaults on qemu-system-sparc64

2024-02-28 Thread Robie Basak
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Tags removed: server-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054219 Title: Debian installer segfaults on

[Bug 2048906] Re: ngspice-36 crashes in various ways

2024-02-27 Thread Robie Basak
** Also affects: ngspice (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048906 Title: ngspice-36 crashes in various ways To manage

Re: Upload of translation files

2024-02-27 Thread Robie Basak
Hi, On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 08:04:50PM -, Jack wrote: > Dear langpack-team, > > I'm recently working on the Ladin Language Pack and I have some issues > uploading translation files. Sorry I don't know how to help you directly, but you could try the ubuntu-translators list here:

[Bug 2048921] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (30 -> 31) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Jammy, Mantic

2024-02-27 Thread Robie Basak
Regression bug 2055046 filed - thank you! I understand a new upload is on the way. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-focal verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-failed

[Bug 2055046] Re: ubuntu-pro-client:3 duplicate log entry for /var/log/ubuntu-advantage-license-check.log

2024-02-27 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags added: regression-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055046 Title: ubuntu-pro-client:3 duplicate log entry for /var/log/ubuntu-advantage- license-check.log To manage

Bug triage report for 2024-02-19 (Monday triage)

2024-02-19 Thread Robie Basak
> LP: #1833322 | * | D | Confirmed | irqbalance | > Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by defaul… | This is being actively discussed. No triage action needed. > LP: #1983076 | * | D | Fix Released | qemu| Fixes > for >1.01TB

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053146] Re: openssh 8.9p1 for Jammy auth2-gss patch for gssapi-keyex method is slightly wrong

2024-02-19 Thread Robie Basak
I'm flagging this as Critical. It sounds like everyone agrees that the distro patch we're carrying is bad. I think it's possible that it's bad in quite a serious way, so we should investigate immediately without delay until we've understood the severity of this, especially because by carrying the

Re: git-ubuntu MP workflows in Launchpad

2024-02-16 Thread Robie Basak
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 11:25:24AM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > I also posted here yesterday, having forgotten about this thread: > https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/improving-the-git-ubuntu-based-sponsorship-workflow/37964 Both of these threads died, and sorry again for accidentally spl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995790] Please test proposed package

2024-02-15 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Mekaniserad, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.4.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995790] Re: regression: ?garbage does not work correctly in install commands

2024-02-15 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Mekaniserad, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.7.3ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051181] Re: apt cannot upgrade phased updates if the current security version is same as updates

2024-02-15 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Andy, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.7.3ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051181] Please test proposed package

2024-02-15 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Andy, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.4.12 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2052360] Re: empty /proc/cpuinfo can cause segfault

2024-02-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello dann, or anyone else affected, Accepted cmake into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cmake/3.22.1-1ubuntu1.22.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 2052362] Re: cmake FTBFS due to test failure w/ git protocol.file.allow=user default

2024-02-14 Thread Robie Basak
Hello dann, or anyone else affected, Accepted cmake into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cmake/3.22.1-1ubuntu1.22.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2007702] Re: [SRU] Deb version numbering is misleading

2024-02-14 Thread Robie Basak
Rejecting from the Unapproved queues as Steve's request above has not been addressed in over a month. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007702 Title: [SRU] Deb

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2047450] Re: tail emits no output for sysfs files when using large page kernels

2024-02-07 Thread Robie Basak
I'm retrying these failing autopkgtests with migration-reference/0 since if they fail anyway they shouldn't hold things up. In the meantime, could you please also verify that behaviour on 4K page size hasn't regressed? It looks like this was implied in the Test Plan but hasn't been verified.

Re: Noble publication settings change

2024-02-06 Thread Robie Basak
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:56:05AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Can techboard please action the following request for Noble distro series > https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/709163 ? > > It is acked by the apt repository format maintainer. That link refers to getting

~ubuntu-server subscription changes

2024-02-02 Thread robie . basak
The following subscriptions are missing: ruby3.2 Missing subscriptions added -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

[Pkg-perl-maintainers] [Bug 2046154] Re: [MIR] libcryptx-perl (libmail-dkim-perl dependency)

2024-02-01 Thread Robie Basak
I don't anticipate a problem with this, at least in principle, from an SRU team perspective. However I can't give a pre-ack because it would depend on a review of the specifics that we don't have right now. New features are permitted to be added in LTSes. Further, Ed25519 support for DKIM in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2042587] Update Released

2024-01-31 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for dnsmasq has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045570] Update Released

2024-01-31 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for dnsmasq has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049318] Re: [SRU] free(): double free detected in tcache 2

2024-01-31 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for preparing the SRU and for testing! The Test Plan agreed in the bug description included two cases but it looks like you only did the first one? Given that a different SRU team member did the review and agreed the fully stated plan, I don't feel that I'm in a position to then release

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2042090] Re: Orchid Bay MLK2/Maya Bay MLK soundwire support

2024-01-31 Thread Robie Basak
Looking at the firmware-sof SRU, it looks like both this package and the kernel need updating to complete the hardware enablement. So have these been tested from -proposed together? It looks like verification was done separately for the kernel and for the userspace package, and that makes no sense

Re: PAM module ordering with pam-auth-update

2024-01-31 Thread Robie Basak
Hi Philip, On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 05:13:41PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: > Looking at the Perl, it doesn't seem like that difficult a change to make. > > Is it worth filing a bug, and how likely is this to be fixed? Thank you for the suggestion. This doesn't sound like something we'd

Bug#1061410: python3-trio: AttributeError: module 'eventlet.green.select' has no attribute 'epoll'

2024-01-24 Thread Robie Basak
severity 1061410 wishlist thanks This doesn't seem like a bug in python-trio to me. It's simply using select.epoll(). If that's being monkey patched by gevent in a way that breaks things then that seems like either a gevent problem or a fundamental incompatibility in trying to use Trio at the

Bug#1061410: python3-trio: AttributeError: module 'eventlet.green.select' has no attribute 'epoll'

2024-01-24 Thread Robie Basak
severity 1061410 wishlist thanks This doesn't seem like a bug in python-trio to me. It's simply using select.epoll(). If that's being monkey patched by gevent in a way that breaks things then that seems like either a gevent problem or a fundamental incompatibility in trying to use Trio at the

~ubuntu-server subscription changes

2024-01-24 Thread robie . basak
The following subscriptions are missing: php8.3 Missing subscriptions added -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

~ubuntu-server subscription changes

2024-01-23 Thread robie . basak
The following subscriptions are missing: runc-app Missing subscriptions added -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Re: gedit: problematic 'gnome-text-editor' alternative

2024-01-18 Thread Robie Basak
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 07:02:19AM -0500, Amin Bandali wrote: > We received https://bugs.debian.org/1057184 last month about gedit's > 'gnome-text-editor' alternative becoming problematic now that there is > an actual gnome-text-editor package/binary. It sounds like this is being looked at

[Bug 2045667] Update Released

2024-01-10 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045667] Update Released

2024-01-10 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1973084] Re: transmission-daemon high RAM usage

2024-01-10 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-lunar ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-lunar -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to transmission in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973084

Re: I hereby am applying to become a MOTU developer.

2024-01-08 Thread Robie Basak
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 03:45:33AM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: > I am submitting my application for MOTU upload permissions. The Developer Membership Board moved to approve Aaron's application during today's meeting. Congratulations Aaron, and thank you for your continued contributions to

Bug triage report for 2024-01-08 (Monday triage)

2024-01-08 Thread Robie Basak
> LP: #2020260 || D | Expired | samba | Samba > seems to panic after enabling and connecting to ZFS b… | This is an additional report from someone using samba in Debian. I commented to try and set the expectation that we probably won't make any progress without

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2041751] Re: RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

2024-01-08 Thread Robie Basak
The removal of pptpd seems like something that should be release noted to me, to give enquiring users somewhere to refer to. ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2041751] Re: RM: Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu

2024-01-08 Thread Robie Basak
The removal of pptpd seems like something that should be release noted to me, to give enquiring users somewhere to refer to. ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2015562] Re: [SRU] Segfault in dnsmasq when using certain static domain entries + DoH (bugfix possibly exists upstream)

2024-01-03 Thread Robie Basak
"Where problems could occur" says "...in [Other Info] section I included some query examples for well-known domains, so we can be more confident with this change", but I don't see these carried out as part of the SRU verification. Admittedly they weren't documented as part of the Test Plan, but

Delegation of LTS flavour qualification to the release team?

2023-12-20 Thread Robie Basak
As a member of the Technical Board who is not on the Release Team, it always struck me as odd that the TB is responsible for determining which flavours qualify for the LTS label. Personally, if someone from the release team says it's OK, then I agree. I don't think I have anything to add or

Delegation of LTS flavour qualification to the release team?

2023-12-20 Thread Robie Basak
As a member of the Technical Board who is not on the Release Team, it always struck me as odd that the TB is responsible for determining which flavours qualify for the LTS label. Personally, if someone from the release team says it's OK, then I agree. I don't think I have anything to add or

Re: Call for vote Re: Ubuntu Unity participation in LTS

2023-12-20 Thread Robie Basak
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:24:46AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Based on the answers from the flavor leads in this thread, I am satisfied > that Ubuntu Unity meets the criteria for an LTS community flavor for 24.04 > and recommend that the Technical Board approve their plan for a 3-year LTS. >

[Bug 1950959] Re: Missing dependency in libqt5gstreamer-dev

2023-12-19 Thread Robie Basak
** Also affects: qtcreator (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: qtcreator (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qtcreator in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-sdk-bugs] [Bug 1950959] Re: Missing dependency in libqt5gstreamer-dev

2023-12-19 Thread Robie Basak
** Also affects: qtcreator (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: qtcreator (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu SDK bug tracking, which is subscribed to qtcreator

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2045043] Update Released

2023-12-14 Thread Robie Basak
The verification of the Stable Release Update for fonts-noto-color-emoji has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2045931] Re: ps3 sixasis controller request pin to connect to bt

2023-12-13 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for the clarification! I'll remove the regression-update tag then, since this is the intended behaviour of the security update, so it shouldn't count towards regression statistics. ** Tags removed: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045931] Re: ps3 sixasis controller request pin to connect to bt

2023-12-13 Thread Robie Basak
Thank you for the clarification! I'll remove the regression-update tag then, since this is the intended behaviour of the security update, so it shouldn't count towards regression statistics. ** Tags removed: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2039104] Please test proposed package

2023-12-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-settings into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- settings/23.10.5.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039104] Please test proposed package

2023-12-13 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-settings into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- settings/23.10.5.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039104] Re: ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

2023-12-13 Thread Robie Basak
> It is unlikely but possible that the removal of the raspi binary package from this source package will have inadvertently modified the contents of the other remaining binary packages. It might be worth running a binary debdiff for SRU verification then, against the binary packages built in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2039104] Re: ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

2023-12-13 Thread Robie Basak
> It is unlikely but possible that the removal of the raspi binary package from this source package will have inadvertently modified the contents of the other remaining binary packages. It might be worth running a binary debdiff for SRU verification then, against the binary packages built in

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >