Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ec2-hibinit-agent into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-
agent/1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Unsubscribing sponsors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968805
Title:
Hibernation fails when an additional swapfile is added due to priority
mismatch
To manage notifications about
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ec2-hibinit-agent into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/1.0.0-0ubuntu9.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ec2-hibinit-agent into impish-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-
agent/1.0.0-0ubuntu11.21.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ec2-hibinit-agent into jammy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-
agent/1.0.0-0ubuntu11.22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Accepted, but please adjust your Test Plan to actually test the previous
missing *functionality* of opencryptoki+EP11+Dilithium from a user's
perspective. This means something like "verify that a user can use their
token to authenticate against X" rather than "verify that the library
supports X".
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted opencryptoki into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/3.13.0+dfsg-0ubuntu5.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted opencryptoki into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/3.17.0+dfsg+20220202.b40982e-0ubuntu1.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted opencryptoki into impish-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencryptoki/3.16.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Ted, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xdg-desktop-portal-gtk into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-
desktop-portal-gtk/1.6.0-1ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Ted, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xdg-desktop-portal into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-
desktop-portal/1.6.0-1ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Ted, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xdg-desktop-portal-gtk into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-
desktop-portal-gtk/1.6.0-1ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Ted, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xdg-desktop-portal into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-
desktop-portal/1.6.0-1ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 01:45:54PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> Four members - Łukasz Zemczak, Thomas Ward, Dan Streetman and Robie
> Basak - have completed their two year terms on the DMB. Dan has resigned
> his seat, and the other three are continuing on a temporary extension to
>
Thank you for the further details Jeremy.
Seb, Jeremy and I discussed this more out of band, with me wearing my TB
hat as this request matches "other cases where such upstream automatic
testing is not available, exceptions must still be approved by at least
one member of the Ubuntu Technical
Thank you for the further details Jeremy.
Seb, Jeremy and I discussed this more out of band, with me wearing my TB
hat as this request matches "other cases where such upstream automatic
testing is not available, exceptions must still be approved by at least
one member of the Ubuntu Technical
For reference, here's what I see with some of the noise removed:
1001_keep-symbol-DumpThreadHandles-if-debugging-is-disabled.patch is
carried forward. The change to winpr/libwinpr/thread/thread.c is now
gone. The change to winpr/include/winpr/thread.h remains.
All other patches previously
For reference, here's what I see with some of the noise removed:
1001_keep-symbol-DumpThreadHandles-if-debugging-is-disabled.patch is
carried forward. The change to winpr/libwinpr/thread/thread.c is now
gone. The change to winpr/include/winpr/thread.h remains.
All other patches previously
Oh I see them now. Sorry for the noise. I'll delete this and the last
comment in a bit to try and keep the noise in the bug down.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to freerdp2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973229
Oh I see them now. Sorry for the noise. I'll delete this and the last
comment in a bit to try and keep the noise in the bug down.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973229
Title:
Update
> The final change is backporting another patch set (from the stable
branch after the 2.7.0 release).
Where is this change in the upload please? I haven't managed to spot it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to freerdp2 in
> The final change is backporting another patch set (from the stable
branch after the 2.7.0 release).
Where is this change in the upload please? I haven't managed to spot it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: freerdp2 (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973229
Title:
Update freerdp2 to 2.7.0
To manage notifications about
** Changed in: freerdp2 (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to freerdp2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973229
Title:
Update freerdp2 to 2.7.0
Status in
This request doesn't seem to fit SRU policy. Could you please provide
specifics that explain why users need the update beyond "bug fixes", and
a plan to test that the specific issues users are experiencing are
fixed?
Further, I expect one bug per issue being fixed in the diff so they can
be
This request doesn't seem to fit SRU policy. Could you please provide
specifics that explain why users need the update beyond "bug fixes", and
a plan to test that the specific issues users are experiencing are
fixed?
Further, I expect one bug per issue being fixed in the diff so they can
be
Good job finding a solution that works!
What's the status on Debian accepting something like this?
This also seems like a pattern that would be useful elsewhere. Is it
already an established pattern?
I'm reluctant to take this for an SRU without having confidence that we
won't end up iterating
Ah - is it that the same version is now built and published in Groovy
and we can't safely copy the binary backwards? If so, then my second
question of why this isn't going in via focal-security still stands.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Ah - is it that the same version is now built and published in Groovy
and we can't safely copy the binary backwards? If so, then my second
question of why this isn't going in via focal-security still stands.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
Ah - is it that the same version is now built and published in Groovy
and we can't safely copy the binary backwards? If so, then my second
question of why this isn't going in via focal-security still stands.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Hello Nicolas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.18
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Thank you to all involved in the discussion and analysis for carefully
considering the regression risk there. Regardless of the final decision,
I think the thoughtful consideration makes this an exemplary SRU.
I confirmed that the new upload is simply a straightforward review on
top of the
Hello Nicolas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.18
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Thank you to all involved in the discussion and analysis for carefully
considering the regression risk there. Regardless of the final decision,
I think the thoughtful consideration makes this an exemplary SRU.
I confirmed that the new upload is simply a straightforward review on
top of the
Hello Nicolas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.18
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Thank you to all involved in the discussion and analysis for carefully
considering the regression risk there. Regardless of the final decision,
I think the thoughtful consideration makes this an exemplary SRU.
I confirmed that the new upload is simply a straightforward review on
top of the
I'm not sure I follow. I see a retry button for the failed riscv64
build. Can't we just hit that?
If there's some reason that won't work, then why is this not going
through the security sponsorship queue? If we do it as an SRU, then
it'll hit focal-updates only, and focal-security will be left
I'm not sure I follow. I see a retry button for the failed riscv64
build. Can't we just hit that?
If there's some reason that won't work, then why is this not going
through the security sponsorship queue? If we do it as an SRU, then
it'll hit focal-updates only, and focal-security will be left
I'm not sure I follow. I see a retry button for the failed riscv64
build. Can't we just hit that?
If there's some reason that won't work, then why is this not going
through the security sponsorship queue? If we do it as an SRU, then
it'll hit focal-updates only, and focal-security will be left
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 05:23:41PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> # https://pad.lv/1641305 - (Confirmed) [mysql-5.5] - apparmor
> configuration for mysqld is not complete
>
> This is a bug in the backlog not touched in 180 days. Since mysql-5.5 is
> available only in trusty, I set
Four members - Łukasz Zemczak, Thomas Ward, Dan Streetman and Robie
Basak - have completed their two year terms on the DMB. Dan has resigned
his seat, and the other three are continuing on a temporary extension to
help the DMB continue operating pending an election. This is a call for
nominations
s, etc.
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
> CC'd: Technical Board
>
>
> On 5/16/22 10:27, Robie Basak wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 06:34:58AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> >>I am applying for creation of a delegated team for upload access of
> >>(in
3721+00:00
Changed-By: Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Signed-By: Robie Basak
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~16.04.1
Sorry, changesfile not available.--
Xenial-changes mailing list
Xenial-changes@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.
Tooling: I don't know what others do already, but for bulk no-change
rebuild uploads I left behind some of my usual one liners and put
together a couple of quick tools:
prep-rebuild: given a list of source packages, automate fetching,
bumping the changelog and preparing the upload. This leaves a
This reminds me of bug 1384503, and a search reveals some other bugs
that may be related too. Perhaps it's a recurrence of the same
underlying issue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
This reminds me of bug 1384503, and a search reveals some other bugs
that may be related too. Perhaps it's a recurrence of the same
underlying issue?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 04:08:48PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> That was a manual retry triggered by vorlon on 2022-05-09 [1]. The
> only trigger was boost1.74/1.74.0-14ubuntu4, but
> icinga2/2.13.2-1build2 in release is not installable with the new
> boost in -proposed, so britney tries a
On +1 maintenance this week, I noticed an unusual failure of icinga2 on
kinetic with a trigger of boost1.74/1.74.0-14ubuntu4:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-kinetic/kinetic/arm64/i/icinga2/20220509_190945_354db@/log.gz
icinga2 does have an unusual test here. It runs its own
The SRUs already landed related to minor version bumps (eg. 5.3.0-1.1 to
5.3.0-1.3~ubuntu20.04) and the entire set of changes were accounted and
considered for SRU purposes by the SRU documentation provided.
This doesn't apply to the Bionic Unapproved upload though, as 5.1.1-1 to
** Tags removed: server-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970737
Title:
Stalled IO Operations During MySQL Tests (with sysbench)
To manage notifications about this bug
** Tags removed: server-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971788
Title:
Failure to enable SSL out of the box when in fips mode
To manage notifications about this bug go
Hello bs, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.27-3ubuntu1.6
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.27-3ubuntu1.6
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello bs, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.27-3ubuntu1.6
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Khaled, or anyone else affected,
Accepted klibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/2.0.4-9ubuntu2.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Khaled, or anyone else affected,
Accepted klibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/2.0.4-9ubuntu2.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
It's not clear to me if upstream have accepted the patch. If not,
https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/2021-December/004635.html sounds
like it's a deliberate upstream design decision not to.
In Ubuntu, we might decide to maintain the patch as a delta but then
drop that delta in subsequent
Hello Khaled, or anyone else affected,
Accepted klibc into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/2.0.4-9ubuntu2.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
It's not clear to me if upstream have accepted the patch. If not,
https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/2021-December/004635.html sounds
like it's a deliberate upstream design decision not to.
In Ubuntu, we might decide to maintain the patch as a delta but then
drop that delta in subsequent
It's not clear to me if upstream have accepted the patch. If not,
https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/2021-December/004635.html sounds
like it's a deliberate upstream design decision not to.
In Ubuntu, we might decide to maintain the patch as a delta but then
drop that delta in subsequent
I think this is blocked pending bug 1874719?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968039
Title:
DEP-8 test fails in Focal after Corosync update
To manage notifications about this bug go
Package: frogatto
Version: 1.3.1+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic ubuntu-patch
*** /tmp/tmpULOMPK/bug_body
In Ubuntu, the build was failing with
Package: frogatto
Version: 1.3.1+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic ubuntu-patch
*** /tmp/tmpULOMPK/bug_body
In Ubuntu, the build was failing with
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971565
Title:
charm no longer works with latest mysql-router version
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 03:41:59PM -0400, Thomas Ward wrote:
> The Developer Membership Board members (myself included) expire from the DMB
> in under six days - is an election required for new DMB members, or will the
> TB simply extend our current expirations until an election can be held?
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 01:20:30AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> a) This is Ubuntu-specific because of the changes introduced in
> src:rsyslog over a decade ago, which basically doesn't let it run as
> root, which is where I think the problem(s) started to originate.
> However, I am kinda stumped
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 01:20:30AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> a) This is Ubuntu-specific because of the changes introduced in
> src:rsyslog over a decade ago, which basically doesn't let it run as
> root, which is where I think the problem(s) started to originate.
> However, I am kinda stumped
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gvfs has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gvfs has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gvfs has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Thank you for taking the time to do this!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927100
Title:
Slow file dialogs, open and save
Status in gvfs package in Ubuntu:
Fix
Thank you for taking the time to do this!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927100
Title:
Slow file dialogs, open and save
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Thank you for taking the time to do this!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927100
Title:
Slow file dialogs, open and save
To manage notifications about this bug go
I'm on the fence on this one.
On one hand, if it's not really being cared for upstream, then you're
right in asking about whether demotion is appropriate.
On the other hand, it does Just Work, and I've been pointing
inexperienced admins to it for years as a console-sharing
leave-things-running
Package: cloud-guest-utils
Version: 0.31-2
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic
Hi,
cloud-guest-utils is missing a dependency on whatever supplies sfdisk or
sgdisk (eg. fdisk and gdisk), so growpart fails by default. gdisk
is a Recommends. Should this be a Depends,
Package: cloud-guest-utils
Version: 0.31-2
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic
Hi,
cloud-guest-utils is missing a dependency on whatever supplies sfdisk or
sgdisk (eg. fdisk and gdisk), so growpart fails by default. gdisk
is a Recommends. Should this be a Depends,
** Changed in: xl2tpd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy
To manage
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-jammy
** Tags added: lto verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can
Hello Rik, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kstars into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kstars/5:3.5.7-1ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Rik, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kstars into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kstars/5:3.5.7-1ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~16.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~18.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into impish-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.8~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Thank you msaxl and Adrian for performing the verification!
I've also verified in the build log that lto optimisation is now
missing. For example:
cc -DDEBUG_PPPD -DTRUST_PPPD_TO_DIE -O2 -fno-builtin -Wall -DSANITY
-DLINUX -I/include/ -DIP_ALLOCATION -DUSE_KERNEL -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-
map=/<>=.
[adding debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org since I think this is
mistriaged in Debian's security tracker]
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 10:27:42AM +, Cyrille Bollu wrote:
> The vulnerability report that I've received relates to CVE-2022-21363 which
> is purportedly fixed in mysql 8.0.29.
I
** Changed in: xl2tpd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy
To manage
Hi Salvatore,
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 09:52:04PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Should mysql-8.0 be dropped completely from the archive or is there
> still interest in keeping in in unstable?
I think this is a dupe of
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004180? Was asking
Hi Po-Hsu Lin,
Sorry, there's also a decompression step. The relevant code is:
https://git.launchpad.net/uvtool/tree/uvtool/libvirt/__init__.py#n45
It's possible this could be optimized if libvirt's API has had any
enhancements since I wrote that code. It looks like I did it this way
because I
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 11:28:43AM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> Members of the Ubuntu SRU team should now be able to review packages in
> the Unapproved queue and accept them to -proposed for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS.
My queue control buttons have appeared in the Launchpad Web UI at least,
so it looks
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 06:43:18PM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm at a Canonical sprint this week and will be unable to attend the TB
> meeting this week.
I'm at the same event and also unable to attend, sorry.
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
Hi,
In uvtool this is by design. It has to download the entire image before
it can cryptographically verify it, and only then does it start
injecting the image into libvirt. It does that using libvirt's socket
API. Using that mechanism, I don't think it's possible to do a
filesystem-level move to
I uploaded a rebuild of xl2tpd to fix this in Kinetic, but it is still
pending SRU review for Jammy (22.04).
** Changed in: xl2tpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: lto-disabled-list (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug
Thank you for testing the fix! I've now uploaded the fix for inclusion
in an update to 22.04. This is now awaiting SRU team review (I shouldn't
do that myself as I prepared it). Once the fix is accepted, we will ask
for testing again of the final package binary before it is published to
updates.
Filed upstream: https://github.com/xelerance/xl2tpd/issues/232
** Bug watch added: github.com/xelerance/xl2tpd/issues #232
https://github.com/xelerance/xl2tpd/issues/232
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: lto-disabled-list (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951832
Title:
xl2tpd "Can not find tunnel" in jammy
To manage
Public bug reported:
See bug 1951832 for details of the failure. That bug tracks the
regressed UX and will be resolved with a workaround. This bug tracks the
issue that LTO cannot be enabled on this package.
** Affects: xl2tpd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Triaged
--
You
Users affected on 22.04: please test the fix from ppa:racb/fixes
(https://launchpad.net/~racb/+archive/ubuntu/fixes?field.series_filter=jammy).
This is the minimal change to disable LTO, and is the fix I intend to
propose for 22.04 if it is reported to work.
If this does work, then I'll need:
1)
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881
Title:
Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> I'm not sure how to do that in packaging except to try to guide the
user into somehow not following the broken installation flow.
Maybe, *if* it's never useful to use corosync with the default shipped
corosync.conf, we should just not ship it, and add a
801 - 900 of 17396 matches
Mail list logo
