guest271314, what is you point against `nameof` feature?
If you don't like it - don't use it. Why prohibit this feature for
those who find it beneficial?
I see `nameof` beneficial in following cases
Case 1. Function guard.
```
function func1(options) {
...
if (options.userName == undefined)
14, 2019 at 9:48 PM Stas Berkov wrote:
> Less fragile. Less mess. You can rename field/property without fear you
> break something (using IDE refactoring tools).
> With high probablity you will break something when you refactor and have
> fields hardcoded as strings.
> Someone can obj
You get more robust code.
>
> How is "robust" objectively determined?
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:21 PM Stas Berkov wrote:
>
>> ES can befit from `nameof` feature the same way as TS. There is no TS
>> specific in it.
>> It was ask
anguages, most of the use cases don't apply to dynamic
> Javascript
> The only legit use case I can think of is helping refactor tools to
> rename properties (but even mismatch errors between strings and
> properties names can be caught in compile time using modern
> Typescript)
>
Can we revisit this issue?
In C# there is `nameof`, in Swift you can do the same by calling
```
let keyPath = \Person.mother.firstName
NSPredicate(format: "%K == %@", keyPath, "Andrew")
```
Let's introduce `nameof` in ES, please.
Devs from TypeScript don't want to introduce this feature
And how to save computed CSS styles? document.html() will give you just
html, computed CSS styles will be lost.
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 8:50:54 AM UTC+4, Misko Hevery wrote:
We have not done this, but if you feel up to it here is what you can try
1. get node.js running
2.
Hi, when I use 'repeated' keyword in protobuf messages what form should I
use: plural or singular?
E.g. I have message
message RealTimeMarketData
{
// client side subscription identifier
required int32 Id = 1;
// contract ID assigned by server
required int32 contractId = 2;
// new contract
