To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8095
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 23 16:02:36 +
2007 ---
Hooray!
It would be nice to see this return after all these years.
It was very
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8095
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 23 16:02:36 +
2007 ---
Hooray!
It would be nice to see this return after all these years.
It was very
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73159
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 6 02:34:56 -0800
2007 ---
I have had it happen using Firefox on Suse Linux 10.1, Firefox on windows 2000,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72921
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 5 00:25:40 -0800
2007 ---
I feel that the attitude over this issue has, from the start, been high handed
Assigned to|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported by|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 5 00:31:34 -0800
2007 ---
Recent submissions to the issuezilla product produce this message:
-
Changes to issue 72921 submitted
Email sent
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72921
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 25 16:46:15 -0800
2006 ---
I refer the developers to my comments in 44102.
The ordinary user of 1.x could use
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4219
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 19 01:43:50 -0800
2006 ---
Well, I'd re-state my views of November 2004. Autocad appares to have no limit
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44102
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 20 13:17:04 -0700
2006 ---
is wrote:
But now there is an alternative to the rpm installation
Not from where
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44102
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 18 03:50:50 -0700
2006 ---
I do not think those of us who voted for this issue will regard it as fixed
until
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70333
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=37201
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 4 04:49:41 -0700
2006 ---
I'd like to have this facility.
It does seem odd that something so simple, with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61951
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 23 03:12:45 -0700
2006 ---
This is causing a lot of difficulty for my clients, and I would welcome a rapid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59697
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 21 13:07:56 -0700
2006 ---
Any thoughts on this one and on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 21 13:08:41 -0700
2006 ---
Any thoughts on this one and on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64014
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 20 10:27:46 -0700
2006 ---
I would like to add my support for this, but I think it should be a framework
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1598
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 18 01:20:54 -0700
2006 ---
Has there been any update? is anything happening?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41675
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 16 14:04:33 -0700
2006 ---
I can't believe, a year and a half on and a couple of releases later that this
is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15379
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 16 14:16:37 -0700
2006 ---
I've just seen pesala's suggestion from January - I think that is a fantastic
Assigned to|spreadsheet
Reported by|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 15 07:15:42 -0700
2006 ---
Enclosed find an excel spreadsheet taken from the timesheet I use at work - the
cell with magenta text is normally white and invisible
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67399
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67399
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67399
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67399
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64581
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 4 00:18:30 -0700
2006 ---
I have to agree with every word MarshFeldman wrote, I am astonished that the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 4 00:24:59 -0700
2006 ---
I have voted for this, although I was perfectly happy with the old installer
and
|P3
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|spreadsheet
Reported by|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 3 05:34:55 -0700
2006 ---
1. Use file-open from another OOo app (e.g. Draw) or from the quickstarter
2. Navigate
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66963
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66963
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66963
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 3 05:45:13 -0700
2006 ---
Just spotted the 1Mb fle limit for attachments. Even zipped my sheet is 6Mb.
I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66963
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 3 07:47:13 -0700
2006 ---
fst wrote:
BTW using such a lot data points isn't a good idea.
all these little
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16280
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 3 07:53:38 -0700
2006 ---
I commend the attachements to issue 66963 to the developers.
They show a chart
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42644
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 3 07:56:36 -0700
2006 ---
I am pleased to see that the target for 16280 is now version 2.x - should not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66963
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 3 10:40:28 -0700
2006 ---
Thanks.
Hope the example proves useful before the next issue.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7833
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:22:33 -0700
2006 ---
No movement in 4 years?
Nothing that has happened in this time has changed my view
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=28510
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:25:20 -0700
2006 ---
I still think this is a good idea, and am surprised it remains unconfirmed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=28511
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:25:45 -0700
2006 ---
I still think this is a good idea, and am surprised it remains unconfirmed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30130
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:27:45 -0700
2006 ---
I still think this is a good idea, 2 years on.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31460
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:31:07 -0700
2006 ---
I still think this is a good idea, 2 years on.
The Math module has not advanced,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35689
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:32:59 -0700
2006 ---
It's over 18 months now. How about a yes/no decision? If this isn't going to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40484
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:34:30 -0700
2006 ---
I think this one is still valid. Draw, in particular, is clumsy and
undeveloped
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46810
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:41:11 -0700
2006 ---
I still think this is an important idea.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49093
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:41:51 -0700
2006 ---
I'm surprised there is no target on this one.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50574
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:43:35 -0700
2006 ---
Any progress?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53034
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:54:33 -0700
2006 ---
Any thoughts, or progress?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57868
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 1 02:58:59 -0700
2006 ---
Still no target for this one? It really would be useful, you know.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53523
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 9 12:14:10 -0700
2006 ---
Hmm. Not sure that last example shouldn't look more like:
PATHETIC Bla bla bla
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4333
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 23 14:18:40 -0700
2006 ---
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64530 makes interesting
reading.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64530
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 23 14:17:43 -0700
2006 ---
Isn't this interesting.
According to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64530
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64014
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 5 22:31:29 -0700
2006 ---
I would like to commend this idea very much, but I wonder at the wisdom of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40885
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 5 22:34:56 -0700
2006 ---
I have recently come across issue 64014.
I suspect that external style sheets are
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39582
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 4 00:19:03 -0700
2006 ---
When is a paragraph not a paragraph. One gentleman at:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22147
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 27 14:44:57 -0800
2006 ---
I don't think it is too important if the viewer code is embedded in the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22147
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Subcomponent:|code
Assigned to:|spreadsheet
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 27 15:06:59 -0800
2006 ---
According to help for shortcut keys;spreadsheets recalc is F9. According to
help for recalculating formulas
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 27 15:10:09 -0800
2006 ---
See the following:
http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/archive/2005/09/26/474258.aspx
Assigned to:|spreadsheet
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 27 15:13:09 -0800
2006 ---
I suggest that OOo needs to be able to read and write BIFF format exchange
files
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5930
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 16 01:52:56 -0800
2006 ---
I'd like to add my voice to those who think this is important.
It is dissapointing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 03:05:58 -0800
2006 ---
Stupid web site - I've attached a picture to the wrong issue
Sorry
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62492
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 8 02:56:37 -0800
2006 ---
I have to agree.
If it is a major objective of OOo to provide file exchange with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3997
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 23:51:26 -0800
2006 ---
The problems with Chart do the product no good. May I suggest an intermediate
Subcomponent:|save-export
Assigned to:|spreadsheet
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 00:29:59 -0800
2005 ---
When exporting to PDF it is possible to select a page range, but in order to
export from just
Subcomponent:|printing
Assigned to:|spreadsheet
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 00:34:20 -0800
2005 ---
When printing it is possible to select a page range, but in order to
export from just the current
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5560
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 14:58:58 -0800
2005 ---
I had been considering filing an issue for 2.0 on Linux, saying that the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 16:06:25 -0800
2005 ---
I have to agree. the full version number should be easy to find.
Assigned to:|spreadsheet
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 23 14:41:47 -0800
2005 ---
In a similar manner to issue 58309 I would like to suggest new format codes for
sexagesimal numbers. The basic units
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22936
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 20 05:46:46 -0800
2005 ---
Hmm..
Issue 36929 is not an exact duplicate, and it also raises the issue of
Subcomponent:|code
Assigned to:|spreadsheet
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 04:25:04 -0800
2005 ---
There have been many remarks and suggestions about the problem of, for example,
opening a UK style CSV file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 14:26:14 -0700
2005 ---
This is a related and interesting remark:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40885
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 04:50:39 -0700
2005 ---
6. Graphics style
---
One organisation I work for uses a small
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11121
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 03:32:08 -0700
2005 ---
I am amazed that we have got to version 2 and there is still no concept of table
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7984
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 03:38:37 -0700
2005 ---
It has to be said that this is no easier to understand in version 2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54867
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 14:45:49 -0700
2005 ---
I suggest merging this with issue 30132, which already has 6 votes
:|ENHANCEMENT
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|formatting
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 05:13:39 -0700
2005 ---
I think that in emulating traditional word processing
type:|ENHANCEMENT
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|formatting
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 05:18:43 -0700
2005 ---
I think that in emulating traditional word
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 05:21:17 -0700
2005 ---
Browser error - please delete this issue and see 3
Bob
Subcomponent:|www
Assigned to:|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 5 07:22:15 -0700
2005 ---
There has been a lively deep discussion on this matter on the user forums:
http://www.oooforum.org/forum
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15379
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 07:07:04 -0700
2005 ---
I made suggestion 55061 not for the Word Processor component but for the
Assigned to:|tm
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 25 03:58:04 -0700
2005 ---
I have had considerable trouble in the past managing mailservers which get
clogged by people exchanging m$ format files. The system
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40885
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 20 13:54:22 -0700
2005 ---
I'd like to return to this one again.
The more I think about things like the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35123
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 6 11:06:53 -0700
2005 ---
Are you sure that is the correct duplicate?
Issue 3997 is about merging more than
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7998
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 4 22:41:01 -0700
2005 ---
enmane:
I have some sympathy with what you say. In a recent discussion on the user
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17211
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 4 22:42:43 -0700
2005 ---
Will this be addressed in 1.1.5 ? It is quite important.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53307
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 20 00:42:11 -0700
2005 ---
Duplicae of 49093?
:|ENHANCEMENT
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|formatting
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 02:35:46 -0700
2005 ---
The hierarchical heading system implimented through styles
:|
Issue type:|DEFECT
Priority:|P4
Subcomponent:|formatting
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 03:35:34 -0700
2005 ---
I just attempted to create a new appendix on a new
Subcomponent:|open-import
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 8 04:35:58 -0700
2005 ---
I got this file from my office, and had to dig out my old copy of Word97 to read
it. There is every chance
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53034
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53034
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53034
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36696
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 6 13:16:48 -0700
2005 ---
I have to agree. The inability to handle blank fields attractively is so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51787
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48488
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 22:22:48 -0700
2005 ---
I suggest merging this rather interesting idea with issue 18829
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51663
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 7 06:31:00 -0700
2005 ---
I'd like to agree.
If an integrated suite is to mean anything at all, then the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4914
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 6 01:10:00 -0700
2005 ---
I don't feel this is an important thing to copy from word on an as-is basis.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50498
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|bobharvey
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 00:49:52 -0700
2005 ---
There has been some discussion on the forums about reproducing the Word Perfect
typesetting/text/advance function . This is about locating
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50574
User bobharvey changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
101 - 200 of 282 matches
Mail list logo
