To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108993
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108993
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86937
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86937
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111045
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 13 23:14:28 +
2010 ---
Just to complete, it works with DEV300_m84 + ooo-build here.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99622
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Thu Jul 8 11:21:30 +
2010 ---
Okay, I have to revise my description:
I work with the undocked Styles and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99622
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Thu Jul 8 12:27:17 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=70454)
small video to demonstrate styling menue
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99622
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 7 14:25:14 +
2010 ---
kendy: sorry, I do not have it at hand.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99622
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100620
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
|configure
Assigned to|rene
Reported by|geki
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 21 13:36:56 +
2010 ---
Summary says it. Since jemalloc is released on URL finally. Thanks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111045
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 21 13:37:58 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=69029)
add option: --with-alloc=jemalloc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111045
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 21 14:30:18 +
2010 ---
The reason to add it is the same as for Mozilla and Gnash and others.
It is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=111045
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 21 17:12:38 +
2010 ---
Uhm, I don't think memory usage of Mozilla is a good example, but anyway...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63770
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Sat Apr 3 22:17:01 +
2010 ---
Is there any news to this? There is still only this one available. :)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65976
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Sat Apr 3 22:18:51 +
2010 ---
Is there any news to this? Latest patch available here:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78909
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79875
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63770
This issue depends on issue 79875, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79876
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63770
This issue depends on issue 79876, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108080
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108993
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Sat Apr 3 22:26:31 +
2010 ---
Is there any news to this?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108993
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Sun Feb 7 14:50:43 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=67695)
SIGABRT backtrace
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|mhu
Reported by|geki
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 5 17:38:10 +
2010 ---
If '--enable-gtk' '--enable-gio' was given to ./configure.
How to reproduce:
- create ods
- add simple formula
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108993
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 5 18:52:21 +
2010 ---
Just to complete the list.
Only gtk enabled = works.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108911
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108371
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|geki
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 5 10:38:50 +
2010 ---
Summary says it. tstshl2 is not necessary with qadevooo disabled I guess.
My build compiles, installs and starts up just fine.
See attached patch for reference; generated
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108080
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 5 10:39:37 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=66990)
disable-testshl2.diff
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86937
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 5 10:47:16 +
2010 ---
Okay, next build I try without buildfix-vba-as-extn.diff.
Now then, another bit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86937
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 5 10:47:42 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=66991)
Archive-Zip.diff
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108080
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 5 13:38:28 +
2010 ---
sb, feel free to take over this issue.
As long as I see a '--enable-test' and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86937
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 5 14:58:44 +
2010 ---
buildfix-vba-as-extn.diff is obsolete! :)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Sun Jan 3 16:41:34 +
2010 ---
Just an idea. Maybe you can get the Sun Java Mozilla Browser Plugin Developer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107997
--- Additional comments from g...@openoffice.org Wed Dec 30 18:51:54 +
2009 ---
fixed (sub)component
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100334
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100335
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100249
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93559
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 9 15:11:59 +
2008 ---
Hmm, last test was successful. I will see on next build and report to jdk devs
if
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93559
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8
This issue depends on issue 93559, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86937
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 17 17:58:01 +
2008 ---
Well, I use that patch for my builds(in ooo-build).
And I see a ambiguity there
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89955
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89955
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67048
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 14:03:49 +
2008 ---
Well, just to make sure. Please do not drop the configure switch for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67048
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67048
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 17:09:19 +
2008 ---
The question then, why OOo has curl and neon is still valid.
Should not be one of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86670
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86670
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 20 16:41:52 +
2008 ---
This fails for me since plain xulrunner-1.9b4 has sdkdir instead of libdir.
+
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86670
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86670
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 20 19:00:26 +
2008 ---
Lovely Gentoo distro here. They split it like:
/usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9/ |
to|nn
Reported by|geki
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 11 18:11:48 +
2008 ---
dmake fails on ambiguous variable COMP in sc/util/makefile.mk
-
Please do not reply
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86937
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 11 18:12:40 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=52037)
buildfix: vba as extension
Reported by|geki
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 2 22:49:35 +
2007 ---
since neon makes use of openssl, nothing else.
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84181
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 2 22:50:11 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=50055)
move openssl check; hope its okay ;)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84144
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 30 22:56:06 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=50038)
change LDFLAGS to LIBS
Reported by|geki
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 30 22:55:41 +
2007 ---
This happens here because '-licuuc' is added to the wrong flag, LDFLAGS. It
should be added to LIBS where all other '-l*' flags are added to.
Right now g++ complaints at link
by|geki
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 8 09:48:32 +
2007 ---
fix prj/build.lst
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81384
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 8 09:48:58 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=48061)
buildfix
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79557
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 10 23:11:55 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47475)
m225 buildfix
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79557
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80322
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80322
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80084
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80084
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 3 09:34:06 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47288)
fix missing piece
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80084
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63770
This issue depends on issue 80084, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80084
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 2 16:19:08 +
2007 ---
In which cws is this fix?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80084
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 27 09:34:25 +
2007 ---
I tried to change the typedef to 'map int, Any ', though STLport does not see
an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80084
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 27 10:07:35 +
2007 ---
No need to rush. ;)
You may check issue 63770. There is not even a CWS for system
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80084
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 17:00:35 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47119)
map operator[] workaround
Reported by|geki
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 26 16:59:38 +
2007 ---
STLport5 support, split bugreport.
Since STLport 5.1 the map operator[] does not accept enum elements to get the
map element. The workaround used is to cast the enum element to int.
@sb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63770
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80084
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65976
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 24 11:23:56 +
2007 ---
Is there any reason to link to static xinerama library for linux/freebsd
nowadays?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65976
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 24 19:25:23 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47047)
XINC/XLIB defaults; xinerama resets XLIB
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65976
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 24 19:33:10 +
2007 ---
Second patch still sets XINC and XLIB to 'default_x_*'. The Xinerama check
resets
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79875
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 23 15:38:38 +
2007 ---
1. There are(were) already some '#if STLPORT_VERSION 321' checks in source and
Reported by|geki
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 22 11:42:52 +
2007 ---
STLport5 support, split up bugreport.
Configure changes, version independend.
-
Please do not reply
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79874
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 22 11:43:25 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46970)
configure
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79874
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 22 11:44:03 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46971)
stlport version definition
by|geki
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 22 11:48:33 +
2007 ---
STLport5 support, split bugreport.
- iterator - const_iterator
- sw: erase on const'ed funcs
- some ifdefs for STLport silliness; someone kick STLport devs, please
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79875
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 22 11:48:57 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46972)
buildfixes
by|geki
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 22 11:53:39 +
2007 ---
STLport5 support, split bugreport.
I use system STLport51 with boost support.
May be thereof boost includes must be set after stl includes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79876
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 22 11:54:04 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46973)
stl/boost includes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63770
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79874
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79875
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79876
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65976
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 20 10:46:49 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46938)
kill xinc/xlib defaults; xinerama hack
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65976
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79557
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 16 10:42:34 +
2007 ---
oj: Would you mind to supply a patch, please. So that I can add it to ooo-build.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79557
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 15 12:57:20 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46800)
buildfix
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79557
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79557
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 15 17:41:26 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46804)
scp2 part
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76354
User geki changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
to|kr
Reported by|geki
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 21:31:41 +
2007 ---
With STLport5 the application crashes on erase of non-existing element. This is
just a side-effect of current x86_64 brokeness I guess. Should be fixed, though,
I would
1 - 100 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
