To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116423
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 13 17:59:45
+ 2011 ---
-zdynsort was rather useful - but only before --hash-style=both arrived. I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12411
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 30 09:51:10
+ 2010 ---
How do you want resolve this bug ?
In a way that removes the potential
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90439
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108846
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106891
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 13 12:08:23
+ 2009 ---
Don't spawn some things at startup / runtime that we know at compile time :-)
-
Please do not reply to this automatically
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106891
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106891
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101245
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101245
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105755
This issue depends on issue 101245, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90439
This issue depends on issue 101245, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101245
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101245
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104146
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 11 10:57:46
+ 2009 ---
I created a pie chart for the attached data range; it took a little while to
render (fair enough, there is a lot of data) - and produced a beautiful result.
Sadly after a cut
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102671
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 11 12:08:04
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=62916)
data
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102671
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 11 12:08:41
+ 2009 ---
I had to have a good few goes at sizing, perhaps there was some interaction
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 8 11:30:50
+ 2009 ---
Trivial patch as follows.
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102593
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 8 11:41:21
+ 2009 ---
If someone installs the Grammar checker component - they can no longer disable
Java in the app.
Worse - if you do so - you can end up with a cascade of dialogs saying
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102594
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 8 11:41:59
+ 2009 ---
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb51a8720 (LWP 26022)):
#0 0xe430 in __kernel_vsyscall
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92968
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 28 08:47:20
+ 2009 ---
*** Issue 101366 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101366
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100910
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100910
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 7 09:00:37
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=61421)
callgrind / profile - 12% of import spent in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100757
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 7 09:27:09
+ 2009 ---
Hi Kay;
You really don't want to change code because a component is
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 7 08:59:23
+ 2009 ---
The IsA method is really fairly slow, and calls a great chain of other methods,
and more so as we inherit more deeply in svtools' rtti structure. Since
SfxVoidItem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100910
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 7 11:32:37
+ 2009 ---
Since SfxVoidItem is not inherited from is nothing we can make sure.
Sure
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100757
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 7 14:20:41
+ 2009 ---
So - perhaps I am not clear. Having determined, after some work, that it is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100827
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100827
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100827
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Fri Apr 3 11:56:36
+ 2009 ---
The attached patch saves 8 -billion- cycles when loading a 800 row (10 column)
HTML file I have locally [ should be trivially to reproduce with save as HTML /
re-load with some
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100827
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100827
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100757
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 1 10:51:41
+ 2009 ---
The std:map turns into an red-black tree underneath, and our comparison function
is hugely slow, and there is no need to have a strong lexical ordering here at
all - just
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100743
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84751
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84751
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to|cd
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 1 16:14:31
+ 2009 ---
This patch saves ~58 million pseudo-cycles on startup ~2.5% (and a load of
scattered I/O which is un-necessary...).
HTH
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100757
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85679
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 26 17:34:37
+ 2009 ---
Hi Stephan, just saw your updates:
@pmladek: What about using -Bsymbolic
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 17 12:18:01
+ 2009 ---
So - Thorsten mentioned that people were interested in these at the ESC; here
they are - now under the JCA; Sun's very own code.
Enjoy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100265
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 17 12:19:49
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=60980)
patches in an archive
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 13 09:42:20
+ 2009 ---
I was having a somewhat surreal experience trying to debug soffice.bin
having linkoo'd - and it crashing on start:
$ ./soffice.bin
** (soffice:30645): WARNING **: unable to get gail
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100171
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100171
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 13 11:14:41
+ 2009 ---
And that works with the gtk+ plugin, not just the raw X backend ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100171
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 13 16:22:07
+ 2009 ---
Well, the strange thing is - my code has that check for STYLE_INTRO too - but
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100171
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84720
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Wed Feb 25 12:50:51
+ 2009 ---
kz - you committed to HEAD ? either way, since it was horribly broken before,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 23 19:36:04
+ 2009 ---
Interestingly, grokking the codebase for ConstAsciiString - it seems this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98533
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Fri Jan 30 10:20:25
+ 2009 ---
So - I guess we need some more code to store whether we initialized a11y
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98533
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98533
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 27 16:01:18
+ 2009 ---
My personal take, as now reflected in our builds, is that it's too ugly for
by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 27 16:27:28
+ 2009 ---
It seems (cf. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535827 ) that the way
a11y enablement is detected has changed. Unfortunately, that means our code
paths need to change too
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86443
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
to|is
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 12 15:16:04
+ 2008 ---
Just working on the make_installer.pl perl script, and I notice some variable
mis-substitution there:
my setup_osl.ins has:
Description (te-IN) = %%PRODUCTNAME \u0c2e\u0c41
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 12 15:30:54
+ 2008 ---
So - the variable substitution we do is deadly slow; regexps are expensive - we
do a lot of them on each line, when conceptually there is no reason not to do
them for the whole file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97208
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97206
--- Additional comments from mme...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 12 15:39:19
+ 2008 ---
patch in: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97208
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 15:26:33 +
2008 ---
FWIW, the quickest way to solve the legal issue is to add the README and COPYING
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 11 07:10:58 +
2008 ---
It seems we spend a huge amount of time doing tree building goodness in
scriptitems.pm
This patch saves me 10 seconds of CPU time (on my fast machine).
If you apply un-comment
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97124
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86509
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 8 15:27:08 +
2008 ---
b) I don't find the issue anymore but the legal problems were raised by
mmeeks
Platform|All
URL|
OS/Version|Linux
Status|NEW
Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
Resolution|
Issue type|DEFECT
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|mmeeks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96652
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94002
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39440
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39440
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94002
This issue depends on issue 39440, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 17 15:26:31 +
2008 ---
This lookup burns an unfeasible amount of CPU on document load / save and
startup:
--- registry/source/regimpl.cxx 11 Apr 2008 10:49:44 - 1.28
+++ registry/source/regimpl.cxx 31 Oct
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 31 10:20:19 +
2008 ---
In the brave new world of GIO having GVFS enabled as well causes some grief:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7eb5515 in __cxa_throw () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
#1 0xb1fd22b7
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95689
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 28 16:07:42 +
2008 ---
Run OO.o with a recent gtk+ and we get:
$ ooimpress
(soffice:10452): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-z
ero page size is deprecated
I assume this patch fixes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2497
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 27 08:18:26 +
2008 ---
larsnoonden wrote:
the differences are *legal* and ones pertaining to *your*
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64886
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 24 09:23:33 +
2008 ---
skelem: where did you get your OO.o 3.0 from ? this is a go-oo feature that is
not
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 10 14:18:11 +
2008 ---
Index: source/sdstor/stgstrms.cxx
===
RCS file: /cvs/util/sot/source/sdstor/stgstrms.cxx,v
retrieving revision 1.11
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 1 15:10:09 +
2008 ---
I got bored watching helpex take a long time, I did some profiling of the 1st
part of it, and it seems to spend much of it's time in MergeDataFile and below.
My attached patch shrinks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94541
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68660
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 29 14:36:03 +
2008 ---
nah - Florian has a much improved version of this that does nice in-document
field
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93984
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93051
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 29 08:52:23 +
2008 ---
Hi Kay - thanks for the input:
Classically, no Uno object is allowed to keep a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72710
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93051
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 28 10:54:22 +
2008 ---
So - a little more analysis; I imagine that the deadlock has always been there,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 27 09:18:30 +
2008 ---
So - I've updated the patch in ooo-build (changes under JCA etc.) to actually
work
. The UnoApiLock was
obviously introduced by mmeeks in the configrefactor01 CWS.
nonsense - it was riddled with lock takes releases, certainly - but any
threaded code actively using the configmgr deadlocked or crashed within a few
seconds: cf. my regression test. This is now no longer the case - and yes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88382
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 15 15:27:05 +
2008 ---
When doing a highly parallel build you notice this is missing:
--- desktop/prj/build.lst 2008-08-15 15:39:11.0 +0100
+++ /tmp/build.lst 2008-08-15 16:17:22.0
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 11 11:33:44 +
2008 ---
When I do a highly parallel build I get a failure:
/usr/lib/ooo-3/solver/inc/svx/deflt3d.hxx:147: warning: type qualifiers ignored
on function return type
In file included from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2497
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89383
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89383
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73550
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|mmeeks
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 12 10:00:10 +
2008 ---
I attach the perl script we use for applying patches to ooo-build: it might be
useful to have this included up-stream with a generic patching mechanism; the
apply file syntax
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90651
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 12 10:00:35 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=54423)
apply perl script
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89713
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
1 - 100 of 1347 matches
Mail list logo
