To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 8 08:35:29 +
2008 ---
I guess installing non-Fedora packages means I am on my own.
My workaround: In /et
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 8 08:23:45 +
2008 ---
I'm not an expert on RPM. However, I was told that adding an Epoch to the spec
file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 8 08:12:03 +
2008 ---
If yum tries to replace OpenOffice 2.4.0 with 2.3.0, why do you think it's not a
pr
Assigned to|of
Reported by|neuhaus
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 8 06:55:34 +
2008 ---
This is a not a bug in the installer, it concerns the building of the RPM
packages for Linux. I couldn't find a better place in the bugtracke
