To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User msc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 11 03:48:54 -0800
2006 ---
Submitted issue 72457 to include support for more character sets in Calc's dBase
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User msc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User va changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 7 03:37:20 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 24901 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User tv changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 4 03:12:54 -0700
2006 ---
jianhuajiao-fs. I want. but I can not understand completed/fixed for this
issue.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 4 05:20:47 -0700
2006 ---
Well, it would be good to have one large attachment showing the *complete*
patch.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 30 06:45:32 -0700
2006 ---
ianhuajiao, do you plan to come up with a completed/fixed patch?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 24 06:47:51 -0700
2006 ---
Please replace this with a simple check of _rDest.getLength() !=
It can not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 24 11:05:00 -0700
2006 ---
So, in my opinion, a check of _rDest's length to be *smaller* than |_nToLength|
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User jianhuajiao changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 23 01:52:57 -0700
2006 ---
Jianhuajiao - fs: done
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 23 03:53:31 -0700
2006 ---
fs-jianhuajiao: thanks for the update. Unfortunately, there's something left:
if
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 23 05:38:48 -0700
2006 ---
jianhuajiao-fs: thanks your check and patience.:)
if ( ::rtl::OUString(
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 21 23:45:14 -0700
2006 ---
confusion: the VARCHAR default value are two: 50 and 254. when you create
a new
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 21 23:47:04 -0700
2006 ---
2. throw an error.
That's the way to go. As said above, when doing this, please
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 01:46:21 -0700
2006 ---
Should we update the default VARCHAR length to 100 or so ? I know that will
double
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 04:34:20 -0700
2006 ---
I'm fine with the change to 100 instead of 50
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User jianhuajiao changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 06:43:34 -0700
2006 ---
- please remove the unused #include stdio.h and the fprintf
- the loop in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 21 21:10:03 -0700
2006 ---
jianhuajiao - fs:
The problem remains: If for a UTF-8 dBase data source, the user
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 2 01:07:52 -0700
2006 ---
Hi,
is 2.0.4 still realistic for this?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User jianhuajiao changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 25 05:33:13 -0700
2006 ---
I think that make the default encoding as utf8 will bring down the encoding
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 25 05:44:41 -0700
2006 ---
no, sorry, it doesn't. It doesn't matter whether you switch on the problem via
UI,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User jianhuajiao changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 24 04:45:32 -0700
2006 ---
And text files don't have any problems with fixed length values, encodings,
are
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 24 04:49:48 -0700
2006 ---
Michael, I still think throwing an error in case the string doesn't fit is
better
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
38 matches
Mail list logo
