To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
--- Additional comments from cl...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 23 20:24:36 +
2010 ---
*** Issue 83448 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
User jsk changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
--- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 9 08:10:21 +
2010 ---
The information in this issue is different to the implementationm, the key is
c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
--- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Wed May 27 12:05:59 +
2009 ---
Issue 102097 makes unopkg have its old behaviour again.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
--- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 20 09:40:16 +
2009 ---
Rather a "allow-silent-installation". I think it is in the interest of the
publi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
--- Additional comments from brinz...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 20 09:24:42
+ 2009 ---
what about introducing a new attribute: "suppress-on-cmd-install" ?
if true,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
User brinzing changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
--- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 18 09:30:22 +
2009 ---
>this will not help if one *has* to deploy oo via scrips.
As I indicated earlie
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
--- Additional comments from brinz...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 18 08:39:57
+ 2009 ---
> 3.Admin must accept license. Then only the person who installs the shared
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
--- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 18 08:25:42 +
2009 ---
>but it worked until 00 3.1m5 ;-)
by accident.
>and how can one deploy *share
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
--- Additional comments from brinz...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 18 08:09:50
+ 2009 ---
> is not part of the design nor intended.
but it worked until 00 3.1m5 ;-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
--- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 18 07:01:31 +
2009 ---
Issues 99249 effected only Windows.
Apart from that, circumventing to read the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100282
Issue #|100282
Summary|"echo yes | unopkg add myExt.oxt "does not accept lice
|nse any more
Component|fra
22 matches
Mail list logo
