To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 6 09:14:35 +
2007 ---
"When I look at the assembly output, I see that indeed the variable is
hidden but
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 5 13:14:46 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=50117)
the current better output
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 5 13:14:13 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=50116)
the old definitely broken output
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
User hr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 5 12:35:06 +
2007 ---
cmc "I'm very much angled towards leaving OOo alone and sorting it out in the
compi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 5 12:30:31 +
2007 ---
Heiner, Stephan, what's your opinion about that?
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 5 09:02:35 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=50108)
test output for the specific compiler Sun Hamburg
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 4 15:55:09 +
2007 ---
I made a stack of test-cases and fed them to our gcc guys in an effort to pin
down
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 23 13:29:15 +
2007 ---
Our OOo's have be stable like a rock since adding the
#pragma GCC visibility push/p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 7 09:15:22 +
2007 ---
I still do not fully understand what is going on. I will try to find some time
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
16 matches
Mail list logo