To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
User kla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
User argelgastelum changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 20 20:24:27 +
2008 ---
I have just read he comment from davidbl on RLPLOT and checked that out. It is
EXCELL
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 14 18:56:20 +
2008 ---
Sorry to post another comment to this bug, but since this bug is now "closed"
and it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 8 15:19:21 +
2008 ---
>I wish to thank all the people that worked on this.
>I hope all my fellow scientist
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 8 04:22:39 +
2008 ---
Bug 366. When I first reported it, a bit over 7 years ago, I thought I would
soon sw
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 29 14:43:18 +
2008 ---
Can we get an idea of when this change will make it into the binaries? Is this
going
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
User kla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 29 11:25:36 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=51811)
Testcasespec for Y Error Bars
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
User bm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 22 16:35:48 +
2008 ---
Thanks Björn !
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
User bm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 22 16:09:24 +
2008 ---
Is there a spec about how this was implemented?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
User bm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
User jbfaure changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 19 07:22:17 +
2007 ---
Why not use RLPLOT as an add-on for scientific/statistical graphs?It would be
great i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
User iha changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 13 14:14:51 +
2007 ---
@pagalmes
Sorry, I didn't mean to flame. I was just commenting and explaining my poi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 13 14:06:02 +
2007 ---
Please, stop flames !
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 13 13:41:06 +
2007 ---
Developers, just to be clear, we users are well aware of the complexity of the
OOo co
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 13 13:32:16 +
2007 ---
@enmane: I downloaded and tested the new chart, and I'm disappointed. But I also
gave
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 19:50:20 +
2007 ---
mrv,
many of us are not coders and can't help in this fashion. I understand your
fr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 19:05:48 +
2007 ---
Adding noise and pleas in this bug report only delays possible development, if
anythi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 18:08:44 +
2007 ---
This is the single issue which stops me from being happy with my linux system.
I am
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
User iha changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 22 09:26:27 +
2007 ---
-> pagalmes: May be I got it wrong, but it comes out that for the issue tracker
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 5 09:03:09 +
2007 ---
-> lunacarb: please avoid making "noise". Consider posting on the issue only if
you a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 4 23:11:46 +
2007 ---
gang, as much as I'm frustrated with the developers taking so long (6-7 yrs on
the we
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 4 17:21:15 +
2007 ---
3
-
Please do no
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 4 17:11:38 +
2007 ---
Hi guys!
It's really strange that "custom error bars" feature still has not been
imp
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 18 22:42:18 +
2007 ---
I must agree that selecting a range for errorbars is the most important feature
I am
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
User pagalmes changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 6 09:39:59 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 72322 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 27 05:11:55 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 71948 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 8 16:07:09 -0700
2006 ---
**ALL MEMBERS ADDING COMMENTS PLEASE READ** Thank you
**It would be useful if future
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 5 14:09:50 -0700
2006 ---
I can only partially agree with discoleo. Using external applications for
advanced st
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 5 11:31:21 -0700
2006 ---
There is a previous comment that fits very well to my post on external software
integ
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 5 11:23:28 -0700
2006 ---
A MORE COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
=
Many issues were discuss
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 25 01:04:20 -0700
2006 ---
->thfil, enmane: Reading all the comments in this issue it should be clear for
everyo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 23 11:18:25 -0700
2006 ---
It's more fundamental than that and has always been the problem when CS people
lose t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 23 08:43:30 -0700
2006 ---
The barrage of comments over the past 3 or more years says it all. If Calc is
to be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 19 02:20:05 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 69423 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 18 05:29:47 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 69423 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 24 16:31:08 -0700
2006 ---
Please, everyone, any comments not of direct relevance to the techical aspects
of imp
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 24 09:56:01 -0700
2006 ---
sorry if I've made you upset but there is no reason that my post on
Tue Feb 10 11:00
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 24 08:56:03 -0700
2006 ---
First of all, thank you bm and the OO team for your efforts in doing the
programming
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
User bm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 23 11:09:38 -0700
2006 ---
Earth to OOCalc developers!
Please pick up a statistics book and look into the diffe
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 12:48:13 -0700
2006 ---
As a biologist, I heartily agree with the comments above. Any scientist will
tell you
49 matches
Mail list logo