[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-08-21 Thread ace_dent
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-08-09 Thread ace_dent
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-08-09 Thread ace_dent
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 9 06:27:58 -0700 2006 --- I've had a chance to quickly test this fix- Works great. Once again, many thanks to

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-08-03 Thread wg
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 User wg changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-07-28 Thread wg
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 User wg changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-07-27 Thread ace_dent
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-07-26 Thread sj
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 User sj changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-07-23 Thread ace_dent
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 23 06:18:50 -0700 2006 --- Hi SJ, thanks for getting this fixed for 2.0.4- Great! I look foward to doing some

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-07-21 Thread sj
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 User sj changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-07-21 Thread sj
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 User sj changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-07-18 Thread ace_dent
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 User ace_dent changed the following: What|Old value |New value =

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-07-13 Thread hdu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 60479] Alpha transparency ignored for paletted PNG images

2006-07-12 Thread ace_dent
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60479 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 12 19:49:18 -0700 2006 --- This blocking issue slipped from 2.0.3, is it looking viable for 2.0.4? Currently k