To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 23 04:10:14 -0800
2006 ---
We should even think about deleting the compressed download file. This is
useless
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 8 00:44:08 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 62883 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 8 05:39:06 -0800
2006 ---
I opened an issue about this in issue 62883 (now marked a duplicate), but then I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 09:47:52 -0800
2005 ---
Please keep in mind that for distribution software on a Windows network, getting
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 23 00:30:41 -0800
2005 ---
The easiest way to locate a folder is to place it on the desktop. If the user
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 24 14:57:22 -0800
2005 ---
OK, I must agree :o)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 21 17:34:34 -0800
2005 ---
What about to put Installation files into defaultly a folder under root drive
like
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 27 00:37:36 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 56747 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 04:03:29 -0700
2005 ---
Location:
IF we really have to use NSIS, and the directory is really
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 22 16:38:43 -0700
2005 ---
I think the best way to handle the issue for 2.0 would be:
1. unpack to temp
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 14:02:12 -0700
2005 ---
andreschnabel-pjanik:
all your concerns about wasting diskspace is easy to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 09:10:22 -0700
2005 ---
pjanik:
You wrote Tue Aug 2 03:42:51 -0700 2005:
- you do not have a chance to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 8 12:36:05 -0700
2005 ---
Volker: what is your opinion?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 8 22:09:40 -0700
2005 ---
Greetings from Zion National Park, Utah :-)
But as I already said: I'm no
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 3 23:26:37 -0700
2005 ---
Another solution is to add command line interface. It does not require new ui
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 4 01:02:18 -0700
2005 ---
kami_: command line options are useless for typical user. He will simply click
on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 4 02:08:45 -0700
2005 ---
Adding Ingo to CC:.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 4 04:36:06 -0700
2005 ---
We have discussed this problem when we introduced the nsis installer. And it is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 4 07:06:02 -0700
2005 ---
Ingo: I think the decision was wrong.
I think much better way would be:
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 03:24:35 -0700
2005 ---
of @ mh: I don't think it makes sense to remove the installation source after
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 03:42:51 -0700
2005 ---
IIUC it is as follows:
- if you want to run setup.exe manually something wrong
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 04:04:19 -0700
2005 ---
If you start the modify or repair option from the control panel 'Ad Remove
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 04:11:19 -0700
2005 ---
I do not use Windows at all, so my question might look funny to you: is it
typical
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 04:25:02 -0700
2005 ---
If the user installs from CD he usually knows that he has to insert the CD to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 04:29:36 -0700
2005 ---
of: so in addition to install ~210MB on the disk, we will also ask user to keep
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 04:40:43 -0700
2005 ---
If users do it they do it on their own risk. At least it makes more sense to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 07:13:52 -0700
2005 ---
Hmm, interesting question
The windows installers usually do not store the full
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 28 16:02:36 -0700
2005 ---
Looks like it is on purpose. Download template
30 matches
Mail list logo