To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 29 05:55:56 +
2008 ---
*** Issue 86516 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 11 07:38:54 +
2008 ---
ICU engineer helped to identify the problem in our code.
Collator contructor
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 9 12:23:12 +
2008 ---
Karl, thanks for filing the bug, I just setup a wiki page to collect information
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 8 11:22:13 +
2008 ---
Karl,
The problem to handle image/binary rule for certain code ranges sounds like
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 8 14:29:08 +
2008 ---
I confirm that the test build works as expected: UCA sorting with en-US locale,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 8 16:41:03 +
2008 ---
Eike,
I have filed a bug 6131,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
User khong changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
User khong changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 19 12:28:31 +
2007 ---
I have done some more testing and I can confirm that it is a regression
introduced
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
User subir changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 11:54:37 +
2007 ---
I have tested 2.1 and 2.2 in Windows and Linux.
In LINUX it works correctly, the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 15:57:02 +
2007 ---
Hi Javier,
So, adding these up:
I believe that the sequence is correct.
[...]
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 12 02:15:12 +
2007 ---
The patch is useless, it just produces a different type of malfunction.
I believe
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 01:37:57 +
2007 ---
I have tested the patch that I attached (in Pavel's 2.2.1RC3).
The patch does
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 01:40:35 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45790)
Second test for incorrect collation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 01:41:27 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45791)
Second test for incorrect collation - PDF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
User khirano changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 9 02:32:27 +
2007 ---
I think that I did test collation when it was implemented. I have been showing
it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 9 02:33:55 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45769)
Test case in OpenDocument
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 9 02:34:56 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45770)
Test case in PDF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
Issue #|78055
Summary|Khmer collation is not interpreted correctly
Component|l10n
Version|OOo 2.2.1 RC2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78055
User javiersola changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
26 matches
Mail list logo