[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2006-05-18 Thread mmeeks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 User mmeeks changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2006-05-17 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2006-03-22 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 05:20:01 -0800 2006 --- IMHO, please don't use 2.10. It's hosed up and broken ABI-wise. Wait for the next

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2006-02-23 Thread fridrich_strba
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 23 05:57:49 -0800 2006 --- I have this same problem with Fedora Rawhide. Upgrading freetype to 2.1.10 in my

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2006-02-23 Thread jjmckenzie
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 23 08:11:11 -0800 2006 --- Suggestion: Upgrade freetype to 2.10.0. This has been done on the Mac OS X

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2006-02-08 Thread sparcmoz
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 8 02:24:19 -0800 2006 --- This bean problem is not seen in m155 with my own build of gcc4.1 on GNU/Linux

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2006-02-04 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2006-02-02 Thread sparcmoz
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 2 22:53:27 -0800 2006 --- I hope this is correct... I did dmake clean at the top, then cd into bean and

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2006-02-01 Thread sparcmoz
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 1 01:11:32 -0800 2006 --- This now affects libXft building on sparc debian/unstable Checking DLL

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2006-02-01 Thread radekdoulik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 1 01:38:29 -0800 2006 --- try to build with --with-system-freetype

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2005-11-16 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2005-11-16 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2005-11-16 Thread pjanik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2005-11-16 Thread sparcmoz
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 12:06:04 -0800 2005 --- Please see more information in these debian bugs,

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2005-08-31 Thread sparcmoz
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 15:48:01 -0700 2005 --- if i build bean with non-debian gcj (from gcc sources) this error is not seen

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2005-08-28 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2005-08-28 Thread sparcmoz
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 19:35:45 -0700 2005 --- rene: but i am in OOo proper, always. This is direct from anoncvs. I never tried

[porting-issues] [Issue 53880] libcairo.so.2: undefineds ymbol: FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden

2005-08-28 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 19:57:31 -0700 2005 --- hrmpf, yes, I should've read where the error actually is. my bad. Well. the