To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 05:20:01 -0800
2006 ---
IMHO, please don't use 2.10. It's hosed up and broken ABI-wise. Wait for the
next
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 23 05:57:49 -0800
2006 ---
I have this same problem with Fedora Rawhide. Upgrading freetype to 2.1.10 in my
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 23 08:11:11 -0800
2006 ---
Suggestion: Upgrade freetype to 2.10.0. This has been done on the Mac OS X
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 8 02:24:19 -0800
2006 ---
This bean problem is not seen in m155 with my own build of gcc4.1 on GNU/Linux
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 2 22:53:27 -0800
2006 ---
I hope this is correct...
I did dmake clean at the top, then cd into bean and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 1 01:11:32 -0800
2006 ---
This now affects libXft building on sparc debian/unstable
Checking DLL
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 1 01:38:29 -0800
2006 ---
try to build with --with-system-freetype
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 12:06:04 -0800
2005 ---
Please see more information in these debian bugs,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 15:48:01 -0700
2005 ---
if i build bean with non-debian gcj (from gcc sources) this error is not seen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 19:35:45 -0700
2005 ---
rene: but i am in OOo proper, always. This is direct from anoncvs. I never
tried
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 28 19:57:31 -0700
2005 ---
hrmpf, yes, I should've read where the error actually is. my bad.
Well. the
18 matches
Mail list logo