To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 5 10:24:40 -0800
2006 ---
This line is also not documented in the macosxrc.txt file:
#cursorFlashTime=0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 3 12:59:51 -0800
2006 ---
ericb-mox
Please check the last changes in aquacolors.
- Following your
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 3 13:08:28 -0800
2006 ---
ericb-obr
I forgot to mention : aquacolors is only resynced with m156.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 3 13:16:00 -0800
2006 ---
Your changes look good (checked from bonsai):
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 22 05:13:13 -0800
2006 ---
The v10 of the patch fixes the compilation of scp2 -module.
@all: Although I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 15 06:40:53 -0800
2006 ---
Yes, macosxrc can be opened with TextEdit, but manually.
The idea is that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 14 14:26:43 -0800
2006 ---
CC for Oliver (my QA)
ericb-mox
We have tried using macosxrc : a double click on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 12 12:38:19 -0800
2006 ---
mox-ericb:
Ok, the user -folder is good.
Yes, I want the file to be macosxrc.txt
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 7 10:15:17 -0800
2006 ---
The v9 of the patch should applies against m154 and probably later ones as well.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 1 00:23:02 -0800
2006 ---
FYI: kdeint.[hc]xx removal is already done in CWS vcl54 (issue 61234) :-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 31 11:51:38 -0800
2006 ---
mox-pl:
Thanks for the correct fprintf! It worked fine, although it turns out
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 31 13:29:33 -0800
2006 ---
Oh BTW,
the m154 still includes the files vcl/unx/source/gdi/kdeint.cxx and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 30 01:56:03 -0800
2006 ---
mox: the correct line would be
fprintf( stderr, getWindowManagerName(): \%s\ \n,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 30 03:04:19 -0800
2006 ---
ericb-pl
IMHO, a config file is an intermediate, but sufficient solution : we'd
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 30 04:43:02 -0800
2006 ---
ericb: Changing colors on the fly in OOo or the desktop ? To make OOo read the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 30 16:37:16 -0800
2006 ---
ericb-pl
Thank you very much for the information. Very interesting, and I'll take
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 29 12:10:56 -0800
2006 ---
ericb-mox
Your patch does not apply on m154, because some kde stuff has been
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 29 12:18:24 -0800
2006 ---
ericb: the first instantiation is used when you force the integrator with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 29 12:51:23 -0800
2006 ---
ericb-mox
Ok, thank's for your quick answer :-) Anyway, m154 is building, and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 29 14:37:45 -0800
2006 ---
I'm still building OOo 2.0.1, but I applied the kde-removal patch to it, so the
v4
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 02:34:46 -0800
2006 ---
Sorry, but I must say that the current patch is the wrong approach and must not
be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 03:51:15 -0800
2006 ---
adding me to CC:.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 15:57:47 -0800
2006 ---
ericb-ssa
Please correct me if I'm wrong :
DtIntegrator::GetSystemLook uses
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 16:11:57 -0800
2006 ---
Using kde files from OOo 2.0.1 as a template, I have made a first try at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 16:51:43 -0800
2006 ---
The v2 of the patch may compile. But does it deliver? It's all so confusing...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 18:11:25 -0800
2006 ---
I have successfully compiled a local build (OOo 2.0.1) with these changes and
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 23:53:45 -0800
2006 ---
ericb-mox
One more time you did a great work ! I really learned a lot of things.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 11:34:43 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 61173 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 11:55:29 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 61172 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 13:03:53 -0800
2006 ---
ericb-pjanik
Other idea :
Maybe define new colors like COL_BLUE_AQUA and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 12:39:08 -0800
2006 ---
ericb-pjanik
In fact, I already was searching in that direction : in my post on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61174
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 23:53:51 -0800
2006 ---
Ah well, so I guess this won't be a quick fix after all.
I agree that it does not
55 matches
Mail list logo