[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2008-08-01 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2008-01-28 Thread hjs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User hjs changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2008-01-09 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2008-01-09 Thread pmladek
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2008-01-02 Thread pmladek
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 2 13:07:25 + 2008 --- pmladek-cmc: I am fine with your solution. Thanks for taking care of it.

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2007-12-18 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2007-12-18 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2007-12-18 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2007-12-18 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2007-08-23 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2007-08-22 Thread mh
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 22 14:37:50 + 2007 --- @pmladek: any updates on this issue ?

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2007-08-22 Thread pmladek
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 22 15:13:17 + 2007 --- I am sorry, I havn't time to look at it yet. I am somewhat overloaded last year

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2007-02-20 Thread pmladek
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2007-02-16 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 16 08:18:51 + 2007 --- Using other nss libraries then the one from our mozilla project (I know they are

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2007-02-16 Thread jl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2007-02-15 Thread hjs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User hjs changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2006-09-08 Thread mh
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User mh changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2006-09-07 Thread pmladek
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 Issue #|69368 Summary|libxmlsec: prefere standalone nss over the one from mo |zilla Component|porting

[porting-issues] [Issue 69368] libxmlsec: prefere standal one nss over the one from mozilla

2006-09-07 Thread pmladek
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value