To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 14 13:54:20 +
2007 ---
Obviously my try to get all needed developers involved by mail didn't work.
So I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
This issue depends on issue 78465, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 13 15:29:12 +
2007 ---
ericb, sorry, I don't understand your last comment. Can you explain?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 13 15:44:26 +
2007 ---
mba: it is to do with someone adding the aqua keyword to this issue.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 20:14:04 +
2007 ---
mba: ping?
Any news from the developers that got the patches? Are some of the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 21:34:26 +
2007 ---
I sent a mail to all developers that I thought could be responsible for the code
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 15 05:00:36 -0800
2006 ---
mba: huh?
I checked from fwk58 changes from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 15 13:11:25 -0800
2006 ---
The patch Michael Meeks has sent for sfxnewhdl was applied by me in CWS fwk58.
It
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 14 02:36:20 -0800
2006 ---
the patch in CWS fwk58 *does* remove MAC code as it removes the complete class
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
This issue depends on issue 72412, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 11 00:25:44 -0800
2006 ---
Status update:
The issue 64217 is parallel to this effort and actually that issue
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 11 00:35:41 -0800
2006 ---
in addition to code in files, there is one whole files that is not needed:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 11 06:07:22 -0800
2006 ---
I have now gone through the codebase and fixed all the trivial and obvious
places.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 11 06:42:30 -0800
2006 ---
Found additional file that can be removed: binfilter/inc/bf_sw/purge.hxx
(not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 8 06:42:06 -0800
2006 ---
ericb-mox
An issue doing the same is already created in this purpose :
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
Issue #|72366
Summary|Cleanup - remove dead code: Mac OS System 9 and earlie
|r
Component|porting
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72366
User mox changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
38 matches
Mail list logo
