To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 14:12:15 +
2007 ---
@tono: the mingwport04 is integrated... Please, let me know when you can submit
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User vg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User vg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 17 21:34:59 +
2007 ---
@vg: I think everything except python is OK and ready for integration. Maybe
it is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 15:59:18 +
2007 ---
@tono: changes in Python-2.3.4.patch are still vague to me. I didn't get an
update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 13:57:29 +
2007 ---
@tono: I'm trying to make a MinGW build. Unfortunately, your howto seems to be
out-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 13:38:22 +
2007 ---
@tono: mingwm10.dll should be handled as you proposed... The changes in d.lst
are i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 12:26:20 +
2007 ---
@vg: The modification to the followings still seem to be missing.
config_office/co
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 15 12:05:24 +
2007 ---
@tono: the CWS has been built, and some changes were not checked in. Now
everything
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 13 14:57:50 +
2007 ---
@vg: I would appreciate it if you consider the followings and give me
comments, if
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 13 14:40:20 +
2007 ---
I have to apologize that the comments to #ifdef lines in the patch for
libxmlsec t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 13 14:36:06 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45086)
incremental patch for libxmlsec
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 4 13:14:51 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=44869)
incremental patch for libxmlsec
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 4 09:56:20 +
2007 ---
@tono: please, provide a patch with comments for libxmlsec, and, if possible, a
new
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 4 07:33:03 +
2007 ---
@tono: Thanks anyway for getting this sorted out. (And I still think there
should
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 22:15:10 +
2007 ---
@sb: I was wrong. I have noticed that gcc for windows does not accept
dllimport'ed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 21:15:58 +
2007 ---
@vg: Thank you very much for the advise. I will try to use $(EMQ).
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 21:13:16 +
2007 ---
@sb: I am try to do so. If XMLSEC_EXPORT_VAR is specified for inline functions
or
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 16:48:56 +
2007 ---
> @vg: I can understand the situation about tg_def.mk. So it will not work with
>
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 15:51:28 +
2007 ---
@tono: I think I begin to understand. The libxmlsec.dll exports symbol
xmlSecName
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 15:14:37 +
2007 ---
@vg: I can understand the situation about tg_def.mk. So it will not work with
4NT
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 15:08:53 +
2007 ---
@sb: Function reference is OK. The problem only occures data reference case.
If the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 14:22:33 +
2007 ---
> @vg: Hmm ... The problem with tg_def.mk can not be regenarated at my site
> with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 14:21:58 +
2007 ---
@tono: "The typedef expansion in libxmlsec is needed because mingw cannot
accept r
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 10:31:20 +
2007 ---
@vg: Hmm ... The problem with tg_def.mk can not be regenarated at my site with
VC+
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 09:44:57 +
2007 ---
@tono: you didn't answer my question from Wed Apr 25 (about typedef's
declarations)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 3 09:35:44 +
2007 ---
@tono: no, the libraries were optically "ok", but in the dependency walker one
coul
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 2 12:42:41 +
2007 ---
@vg: The older patch of mine was
- @echo LIBRARY $(SHL$(TNR)TARGETN:f)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 15:19:27 +
2007 ---
@tono: the problem was missing .DLL
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 14:40:25 +
2007 ---
@vg: It does not do harm at my site with VC7 Japanese language version and the
bui
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 14:07:49 +
2007 ---
@tono: change:
- @echo LIBRARY $(SHL$(TNR)TARGETN:f)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 28 21:52:49 +
2007 ---
@vg: I have checked icu and python and uploaded new patch for icu. The
fragment mh
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 27 22:49:07 +
2007 ---
@vg: Please check the updated patch for libxmlsec and include it if acceptable.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 27 14:53:40 +
2007 ---
@tono: should I wait for a new patch for libxmlsec, or integrate what I have
review
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 27 11:59:31 +
2007 ---
@vg: I have tested updated libxmlsec and noticed the built dll does not work.
I re
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 21:30:29 +
2007 ---
@vg: I cannot remember the reason why I have introduced them. It was two years
ago
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 10:28:50 +
2007 ---
@tono: in libxmlsec why do you expand typedef's declarations? For example, in
misc/
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 22 11:40:11 +
2007 ---
@vg: Please see the following comment. I will attach patch set fixing the
comment
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 19 09:05:26 +
2007 ---
IMHO you should link statically link psprint to vcl on Windows like the MSVC
build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 19 08:52:06 +
2007 ---
@tono: ok, let us postpone some things for next CWS. Let us integrate things,
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 18 21:43:44 +
2007 ---
@vg: I am afraid I do not have enough time on these two weeks and coming
weekend.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 18 14:33:31 +
2007 ---
There is a new CWS for this issue, mingwport04
@tono: almost all your changes are a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 18 11:17:45 +
2007 ---
@tono: in shell/source/win32/shlxthandler/makefile.mk you added $(COMCTL32LIB)
for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 18 09:22:13 +
2007 ---
@tono: in python:
changes in misc/build/Python-2.3.4/configure can affect other pl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 17 16:26:08 +
2007 ---
@tono: in libxmlsec:
misc/build/xmlsec1-1.2.6/configure: why "-o -f $dir/libnspr4.a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 17 15:50:40 +
2007 ---
@tono: in icu:
misc/build/icu/source/common/umutex.c lines why "#if defined(U_WINDO
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 17 14:48:10 +
2007 ---
@tono: what is the purpose of changes in external/glibc-2.1.3.patch? Why are
they n
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 14 06:31:37 +
2007 ---
@vg: I have foud out one more symbol has to be exported from psprint project.
It i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 6 23:33:18 +
2007 ---
@vq: FYI.
The cjanges for servprov.cxx and tracker.cxx in embedsrv/source/embed ar
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 14:23:55 +
2007 ---
@tono: I will start working on the issue next week.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 14:13:16 +
2007 ---
@tono: I will start working on the issue next week.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 14:09:44 +
2007 ---
I have uploaded patch set of all fixes including lost/missing changes and
patches
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User davidfraser changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
User khirano changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75844
Issue #|75844
Summary|MinGW port efforts part 2
Component|porting
Version|680m206
Platform|All
64 matches
Mail list logo
