To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 09:28:44 +
2008 ---
@gudmund
>But: & or $0 in the Replace box do not insert an empty paragraph mark
I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 08:42:05 +
2008 ---
>From the 2.4 help file (node "regular expressions;list of"):
"& or $0Adds
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 12 23:44:59 +
2007 ---
Hey, this is great! Fantastic job. This will be a big enhancement for OOo's Find
&
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User joopb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 26 17:07:06 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49915)
Test Case
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 25 14:18:54 +
2007 ---
In fact, just to make even clearer that this is related to the REGexp issue:
imagi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 25 10:42:59 +
2007 ---
Ok, thanks for the info on backreferences.
With regard to styles, I know I can rep
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 22 15:53:28 +
2007 ---
I have read this thread several times now, and am ecstatic to see that it will
be p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 14 09:42:18 +
2007 ---
ama->glebovitz: The current implementation will support $n, not \n. See comment
fro
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 10 18:35:50 +
2007 ---
@er
Thank you - that will be useful when explaining the rationale.
@gudmund
There
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 10 16:46:52 +
2007 ---
Question to AMA,
When Christian implemented the regex substitution code, he suppor
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 10 11:43:46 +
2007 ---
Please pardon my ignorance as a layman. Does the "Resolved" and "FIXED" in this
iss
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 10 10:58:07 +
2007 ---
@drking: $n was chosen because later at some point we will switch to the ICU
regex
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User drking changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 9 08:01:29 +
2007 ---
Any volunteers for doing the specification?
We have a first draft at
http://specs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 23 11:12:20 +
2007 ---
Andreas, please consider my comments in #desc55 from Mon Aug 14 10:43:40 +
2006
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User ama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User st changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 17 15:47:27 +
2007 ---
I programmed a replace function in Delphi (I'm sorry to say that I'm absolutely
no
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 11:32:30 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 76188 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 21 10:16:19 +
2007 ---
Hi!
Any news?
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 5 12:19:22 +
2007 ---
I will set up a CWS for this patch and we will see, how far we'll get. Stay
tuned!
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 3 11:27:17 +
2007 ---
Could you please integrate the patch into the product? You can make improvements
at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User schaber changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 8 11:15:34 -0800
2006 ---
Getting this in would be great.
I understand the requests for availability of the f
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 8 08:57:34 -0800
2006 ---
What is happening with that issue? When will it be integrated? 73 votes...
Shouldn'
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
User gudmund changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 9 06:18:47 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 25177 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 22 04:52:09 -0700
2006 ---
> Shouldn't the functionality of textsearch (and textreplace) be integrated into
>
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 21 12:08:19 -0700
2006 ---
Christian,
Shouldn't the functionality of textsearch (and textreplace) be integrat
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 21 10:45:08 -0700
2006 ---
I'm currently in the phase of reorientate myself in the code. I hope I can
realise
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 31 06:31:06 -0700
2006 ---
Christian,
I helps to click on the correct link before making comments *blush*. I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 30 16:04:57 -0700
2006 ---
> An important issue in changing the behavior of \0 to all matching groups is
> th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 30 13:42:15 -0700
2006 ---
@cloph
Good points.
An important issue in changing the behavior of \0 to all matc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 29 14:39:51 -0700
2006 ---
Well - \0 for all matching groups just seemed to be more logical to me. (again
reme
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 08:57:49 -0700
2006 ---
I may be missing something, but the IEEE document that er posted specifies the
regu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 08:33:27 -0700
2006 ---
I've been using "vi" for 21 years and ALAICR "&" has had a special meaning. I
use
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 07:41:05 -0700
2006 ---
I would be happy to get rid of the "&".
I'm not used to treat it as a special chara
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 06:12:32 -0700
2006 ---
AFAIK there is no standardized specification for \0. However, quite a few
implement
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 21 18:34:05 -0700
2006 ---
Where does the functionality for \0 => all match groups specified? POSIX? Gnu?
If t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 21 15:57:28 -0700
2006 ---
> er just wanted to say that new comments should be written in english,
When conti
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 21 13:42:11 -0700
2006 ---
@cheyrich:
heavy documentation in the code is not bad! er just wanted to say that n
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 14 06:14:18 -0700
2006 ---
Sorry, my previous request (below) was too short to be meaningful.
Since there are
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 14 05:10:52 -0700
2006 ---
Eike
> I took a short glance at this patch, it looks viable in general (apart from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 14 03:50:52 -0700
2006 ---
It would be good to have a summary of the RegEx behaviour, viz., what is
replaced b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 14 03:43:40 -0700
2006 ---
Andreas, Christian,
I took a short glance at this patch, it looks viable in genera
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 11 14:30:25 -0700
2006 ---
So, will this patch get accepted to the OO code tree?
53 matches
Mail list logo