To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from martingpr...@openoffice.org Fri Jan 21
16:33:43 + 2011 ---
Any progress / workarounds for this by now?
Still crappy input field edit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User nico_r changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Nov 18 16:26:37 +
2009 ---
*** Issue 47799 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User b_michaelsen changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User b_michaelsen changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from b_michael...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 10
08:08:32 + 2009 ---
FYI, flr created cws field01 to resolve remaining issues and finish the
i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 10 06:12:09 +
2009 ---
Exactly the form mode is broken in the patch as it quite often requires
protected
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from n...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 10 03:04:39 +
2009 ---
So the decision not to activate the patch was right. I don't know if the users
of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 8 06:47:19 +
2009 ---
So the decision not to activate the patch was right. I don't know if the users
of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from andreschna...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 8
05:49:58 + 2009 ---
protected section feature is broken in recent go-oo builds. I had severa
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 7 21:01:27 +
2009 ---
In the version of the patch we received the protected section feature was broken
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 7 20:55:02 +
2009 ---
As described in some comments, the patch still is too buggy and so we had to
disa
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from n...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 7 19:58:06 +
2009 ---
For what it's worth, input boxes and check boxes are working very well in:
$ cat
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Tue Jul 7 12:30:17 +
2009 ---
CWS swenhancedfields2 has already been integrated into DEV300m31. What is left
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 11 08:33:43 +
2008 ---
The patch contains some unsolved problems and we have no time line when they
will b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 11 07:53:32 +
2008 ---
Not even 3.2?!
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User b_michaelsen changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User newt changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 12 15:32:45 +
2008 ---
@kpalagin: Im sorry, but I cannot guarantee that this will make it into 3.1. I
am w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 7 21:38:58 +
2008 ---
b_michaelsen,
will this be integrated in 3.1?
Regards,
KP.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
This issue depends on issue 93321, which changed state:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User b_michaelsen changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User b_michaelsen changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 1 22:21:28 +
2008 ---
*** Issue 49604 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 29 10:54:51 +
2008 ---
flr->mux2005: That not true!
E.g. fields of the form:
Some Comment: \par
\p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 29 10:47:49 +
2008 ---
I can understand that the internal data structures may have to be changed to
suppor
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 29 10:36:02 +
2008 ---
flr->mux2005: You're right!
However --- the main reason this issue is open for many
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 29 07:35:04 +
2008 ---
AFAICT a new field type is being used for in-place editing. Why has this
approach b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User strob changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 20:09:05 +
2008 ---
Tested with linux (Ubuntu 7.10 - Gutsy - 2.6.22-14-generic) installed as a
parallel
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 04:22:36 +
2008 ---
@Cor:
You can test with the New Zealand 'Ship Inward Report' listed here:
http://
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User noop changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 27 20:59:58 +
2008 ---
Hi,
Just created some documents in Word with formfields: text, check and drop-down.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 20 13:50:02 +
2008 ---
I was able to download and install the software you wanted me to test. What I
fou
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User eberlein changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 14:50:44 +
2008 ---
In our qa-upload.service of OOo you will find installation sets for Linux,
Solaris
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 13:45:35 +
2008 ---
An "upstream" build will be available for testing shortly. Unfortunately the
patch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 13 13:15:54 +
2008 ---
Hi,
the preliminary work is integrated in http://go-oo.org/. The upstreaming in
Op
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 13 12:57:18 +
2008 ---
I just received an email asking me to comment on this issue. I guess I don't
know
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User khirano changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 7 17:00:10 +
2008 ---
Florian, thanks again for continuing to work on this issue. Are there any
updated p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 6 08:07:25 +
2008 ---
Thanks Florian, I will commit the changes to a CWS and report back.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 5 23:51:57 +
2008 ---
flr->hiney: Thx for the sample docs. Seems to work fine (at leasr the .DOC /
.RTF i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 5 22:27:34 +
2008 ---
doh !!! once more with the full domain shall we :-)
http://www.familycourt.gov.au/p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 5 21:49:31 +
2008 ---
flr->mba: Yes; will do that. As you know my arm is broken and the cast will be
on f
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 5 20:22:18 +
2008 ---
@flr: Yes, this plan is still valid. Of course we could have a look on the
patch. I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 5 19:30:06 +
2008 ---
flr->kpalagin: Had a chat with mba about it. The current plan is to get it into
OOo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 5 18:50:16 +
2008 ---
Florian,
thanks a ton for your answer!
Is the patch ready?
Do you have an estimate
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 5 18:07:07 +
2008 ---
Btw. Current patches can be found in:
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/ooo-build/trunk/p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 5 18:00:20 +
2008 ---
flr->hiney: Looks like your link is broken --- it only shows me www.yahoo.com...
I'
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 5 00:02:45 +
2008 ---
here's an example of why i feel the popup is so clunky.
http://www/presence/connect
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User kpalagin changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 29 16:22:22 +
2007 ---
Hi Florian,
from what I can tell this is exciting new stuff for OOo! Tabbing back a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 18 22:45:40 +
2007 ---
Thanks so much for the testing. Sure send the doc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll
treat
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 18 19:25:54 +
2007 ---
Yes! Initial test using the NZ Customs form on linux (Ubuntu Feisty 7.04) works!
Ev
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 16 08:26:34 +
2007 ---
A snapshot of the current work can be found here:
http://florianreuter.blogspot.com
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User pagalmes changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User kami_ changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 28 12:41:32 +
2007 ---
Great news! Thanks for starting the implementation. I would like to help testing
th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User flr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 10 23:46:21 +
2007 ---
How does one go about determining the status of this bug?
Is there any possibilit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User cornouws changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 18 10:13:17 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 79720 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User jrahemipour changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 12:19:03 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 35088 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User pmike changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User manens changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33737
User baumux changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
73 matches
Mail list logo
