To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 17 10:45:13 +
2011 ---
@sb: making includes a re alphabetically sorted a part of the definition of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 11 11:03:22 +
2011 ---
In cws gnumake3 I added the include to sw/source/core/undo/docundo.cxx
Usually
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 11 11:21:02 +
2011 ---
a matter of taste, I suppose. I would agree to tono here that the include
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
--- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 11 13:24:23 +
2011 ---
@fs: In stlport ::std::numeric_limits is not defined in limits but in an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 10 13:00:46 +
2011 ---
fs-tono: In case of such an obvious build breaker with such an obvious patch,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116908
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
