To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 7 10:33:02 +
2010 ---
*** Issue 113000 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 7 09:51:31 +
2010 ---
*** Issue 112997 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 1 07:44:15 +
2010 ---
*** Issue 111982 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Fri May 21 11:57:50 +
2010 ---
Extensions already use 32 bit string length as our UNO API uses the mentioned
oth
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Fri May 21 11:54:00 +
2010 ---
>From my POV this was never a "nobody needs that".
Please don't mix the step fro
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from flori...@openoffice.org Fri May 21 07:47:26
+ 2010 ---
A simple parameter won't work here, what would help a lot however to prevent
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from mike_h...@openoffice.org Fri May 21 07:20:14
+ 2010 ---
The tone of the discussion here has changed a little from 'this isn't someth
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu May 20 21:56:37 +
2010 ---
The number of files to change is huge.
To give you (or the ambitious developer r
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from flori...@openoffice.org Thu May 20 18:38:41
+ 2010 ---
Come on folks, piduca took the trouble to download and install this, probably
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from si...@openoffice.org Thu May 20 17:34:33 +
2010 ---
piduca: We all want to have this issue fixed. It is very important to be civil
a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu May 20 15:31:20 +
2010 ---
Your post is a perfect example why users and developers often talk past each
oth
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from pid...@openoffice.org Thu May 20 13:24:58
+ 2010 ---
Hello everyone.
(at first, sorry for my very bad English)
Every week I need to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User thierrym changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from mike_h...@openoffice.org Sun Jan 3 23:15:49
+ 2010 ---
@anoopshah
Those are very imaginative approaches, but do they resolve the pr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from anoops...@openoffice.org Sat Jan 2 16:35:11
+ 2010 ---
I presume lawyers want to create documents that look like a single paragraph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 3 12:34:17 +
2009 ---
*** Issue 107382 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Ot
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User lijian changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from renatoyam...@openoffice.org Sat Sep 26
17:39:14 + 2009 ---
Diego, IMHO I think that only way to fix this bug is buying a Microsoft O
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from diegom...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 25 15:16:34
+ 2009 ---
Hi!
I started this bug back on Monday, Jul 21 2003.
I still have hope so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from urm...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 10 03:27:21
+ 2009 ---
Still present in OOO310m11 (9399). Come on, it's 6 yr. old bug. Even Word 2 had
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 20 15:38:26 +
2008 ---
Our QA won't accept a partial fix for this issue.
So again: if somebody knows a c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 20 14:44:40 +
2008 ---
I don't agree with separate this bug in TWO.
IMHO:
1) Change priority of this bug
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 20 12:31:04 +
2008 ---
I just mentioned that if there was something that deserves a "P2" it would be
the d
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 20 10:09:09 +
2008 ---
I filed a separate bug for the data loss issue
(http://www.openoffice.org/issues/sh
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 20 09:51:41 +
2008 ---
That depends. If the requirement is about extending the size of paragraphs, it's
at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 19 16:53:33 +
2008 ---
I think that correct "Priority level" need be P2 and not P3.
P2 is an issue with "d
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 19 00:04:54 +
2008 ---
*** Issue 96176 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User volkov_peter changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 6 06:11:41 +
2008 ---
*** Issue 85007 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 30 17:47:53 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 84902 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 9 08:53:05 +
2007 ---
Thanks for the hint; as issue 59185 looks a bit more complicated to fix I keep
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 9 06:52:44 +
2007 ---
Here is another data-loss issue - 59185.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 19:14:43 +
2007 ---
Folks, can we move that discussion elsewhere? The poor developers that later on
wil
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User gnustavo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 17:10:59 +
2007 ---
Frankly, this whole issue confuses me. Why do you want a fixed maximum size for
a p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 16:56:24 +
2007 ---
Guys, we have to put this in perspective.
My point was that 32-bit is just enough f
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 13:30:47 +
2007 ---
floris_v, that's exactly my point. With 32-bit, it's possible to give examples
of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 13:09:42 +
2007 ---
That sounds reasonable, but what if a clever person opens all volumes of the EB
int
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 12:50:56 +
2007 ---
Just to get an idea what 32-bit or 64-bit size paragraphs can give you:
"32-bit" s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 11:35:44 +
2007 ---
jwr: the 16Bit limit IMHO is just a bug; in OOo's API Strings have 32Bit length,
ju
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 11:28:58 +
2007 ---
I don't think 2^64 is necessary. But I think it will be reasonable by the time
thi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 11:25:12 +
2007 ---
An upper limit for paragraph lengths must always be considered as a second best
cho
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 11:04:00 +
2007 ---
Why only 64Bits and not 128? ;-)
OK, I hope you see what I mean: larger is not nece
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 10:44:40 +
2007 ---
I just want to suggest that when this is fixed, the limit be changed from 2^16
to 2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 7 20:41:40 +
2007 ---
I've filed Issue 83427 (http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83427),
wh
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 6 19:17:11 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=49478)
very long paragraph sample
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 6 19:15:38 +
2007 ---
That is very easy to prove that contents get lost unoticed. On the attached
documen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 6 17:24:51 +
2007 ---
Excellent! So in case we have reproducable scenarios where either OOo crashes or
do
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 6 16:41:31 +
2007 ---
Was waiting to see if someone more experienced would volunteer...
I'm happy to ha
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 5 15:34:50 +
2007 ---
Sure, I'm happy with doing that. Unfortunately this issue basically is not about
fi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 5 14:30:06 +
2007 ---
I fully understand this problem cannot be solved soon.
However I could imagine some
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 5 14:17:24 +
2007 ---
I understand that this issue is a killer for a few users. But as the defect is
in s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User asrail changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User cornouws changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1 21:56:48 +
2007 ---
Can someone change Target Milestone?
This bug is very important because can LOST da
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 21 00:48:03 +
2007 ---
I have a doubt.
Here we have any OOo developer reading this issue?
This bug is very
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 20 17:37:43 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 82809 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User simos changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User mike_hall changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User vion changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 20 08:40:04 +
2007 ---
US- and EU-gouvernments decided to use "Open Format" for all official documents
inc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 15:37:58 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 76313 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User kpalagin changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 7 23:38:45 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 74323 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 4 01:47:06 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 72234 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 1 14:57:16 -0700
2006 ---
On OOo 2.0.4rc2 Linux, the statistics are wrong for the LongPara document. The
sta
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User pmartel60 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 18 03:25:23 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 69580 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User baumux changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 11 16:50:57 -0700
2006 ---
Cloph,
you have an e-mail @openoffice.org, so I think that you work on OpenOffice.O
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 10 05:41:35 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 68340 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 4 02:28:39 -0700
2006 ---
1st: This kind of attitude is extremely unhelpful for anything. Obviously, the
majo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 2 14:55:36 -0700
2006 ---
1st: If you think changing this is so easy, then provide a patch or pay someone
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 23 18:11:11 -0700
2006 ---
This bug have 3 YEARS!?!
Some friends have problems with this bug, because some doc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User renatoyamane changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User renatoyamane changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
User ataraxia changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 9 03:06:20 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42283 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=17171
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 20 11:19:41 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 41049 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
83 matches
Mail list logo