[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 28 04:58:08 -0800 2006 --- in CWS ww8perf01

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 User mikeleib changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 16 04:41:40 -0800 2006 --- This patch breaks building without STLport when using gcc 4.0 or 4.1.

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 00:11:33 -0800 2006 --- timar - for FSF.hu build

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 00:57:09 -0800 2006 --- flr-mba: Do you think its possible to get this into 2.0.2? Technically the patch

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 07:33:43 -0800 2006 --- Perhaps the fact the ww8 imports are slow is a defect? WRT to memory

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 08:45:17 -0800 2006 --- It's not a showstopper to keep the performance as it is. I can't judge a possible

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 04:42:21 -0800 2006 --- I think it's too late for 2.0.2, mainly because the final build is going to start

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 8 17:22:45 -0800 2006 --- I would like to get this in 2.0.2, if possible. Any chance of that?

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 7 03:48:08 -0800 2006 --- up to flr as maintainer IMO. cmc-flr: you could reassign this to mikeleib for him

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 01:00:42 -0800 2006 --- Hi cmc, do you have any suggestions regarding this patch? Maybe its better

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 01:25:01 -0800 2006 --- I don't really mind either way, the intent of the original code was angled towards

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 08:24:29 -0800 2006 --- The memory usage is relatively small, when you look at the size of the structs.

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 User mikeleib changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 5 14:57:00 -0800 2006 --- I have a cws open for this, ww8perf01, but CVS tells me I don't have commit rights

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 06:35:08 -0800 2006 --- Hi! Are there any information about this patch? It is ready to use, usable or need

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 09:10:25 -0800 2006 --- As far as I know it works fine. It's been in ooo-build for a good while now.

[sw-issues] [Issue 53055] WW8 imports could be fast er; patch proposal attached

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53055 User mru changed the following: What|Old value |New value