To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
O
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 13 07:23:32 +
2009 ---
tl->imd: please don't make suggestion in an already fixed and closed issue.
I you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from i...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 13 04:03:39 +
2009 ---
Any plans to make this default? No one did for the 3.0 release, but it
shouldn't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
User sba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 8 01:49:51 -0800
2006 ---
Hi tl ! :-)
Thanks so much for getting this committed.
> 2) I replaced the mag
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 8 02:21:17 -0800
2006 ---
TL->mmeeks: Too much praise since it is your patch to begin with. And compared
to t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 8 02:17:41 -0800
2006 ---
>> 3) The default file format version used for new user-dictionaries created via
>>
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 8 02:08:31 -0800
2006 ---
About the sample dictionaries in the archive attached above:
a40neg.dic is a nega
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 03:22:52 -0800
2006 ---
Hi Mathias:
> (1) User has "old" dictionary and loads it with the patched Ooo vers
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 03:09:06 -0800
2006 ---
adding me to cc
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 03:03:30 -0800
2006 ---
Two questions concerning compatibility:
(1) User has "old" dictionary and loads it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 2 06:47:39 -0800
2006 ---
Hi tl:
> - The magic header lines removed in the patch are to distinguish between
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 2 06:31:51 -0800
2006 ---
nemeth->mmeeks, tl: Hi, I'm very fond of this patch. I would like to improve it
wit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 2 06:15:15 -0800
2006 ---
Adding maccy as well to CC list.
TL->mmeeks: Thanks for providing a patch!
But I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 2 05:22:44 -0800
2006 ---
Adding Lacy (owner of hunspell, OOo 2.0.2 spellchecking engine) to CC.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
24 matches
Mail list logo