[sw-issues] [Issue 66010] Table of content shift con tent to next column

2008-07-15 Thread cornouws
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 User cornouws changed the following: What|Old value |New value =

[sw-issues] [Issue 66010] Table of content shift con tent to next column

2008-07-15 Thread cornouws
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 User cornouws changed the following: What|Old value |New value =

[sw-issues] [Issue 66010] Table of content shift con tent to next column

2008-07-15 Thread jbfaure
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 15 12:40:53 + 2008 --- Works for me with OOo 2.4.1 on Kubuntu 6.06. I tested the original file from Lauren

[sw-issues] [Issue 66010] Table of content shift con tent to next column

2008-07-15 Thread cornouws
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 User cornouws changed the following: What|Old value |New value =

[sw-issues] [Issue 66010] Table of content shift con tent to next column

2008-01-02 Thread jbfaure
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 User jbfaure changed the following: What|Old value |New value ==

[sw-issues] [Issue 66010] Table of content shift con tent to next column

2007-02-02 Thread seyedjafari
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 User seyedjafari changed the following: What|Old value |New value ==

[sw-issues] [Issue 66010] Table of content shift con tent to next column

2007-02-02 Thread seyedjafari
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66010 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 2 17:36:26 + 2007 --- The following attached file contains enough headings to reproduce the same problem