To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Additional comments from bor...@openoffice.org Sat Jan 17 17:18:30
+ 2009 ---
Crissov, they are too stubborn to even admit that this issue is a defect.
If it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Additional comments from cris...@openoffice.org Sat Jan 17 14:19:15
+ 2009 ---
OO ist breaking fundamental user interface paradigms here. Don’t mention the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 12 14:38:55 +
2007 ---
I was asking to agree that it was not normal to see 1.01 when you input 1.00 :)
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 12:54:42 +
2007 ---
->bornmw: Sorry, not agreed.
It doesn't make sense to keep issues open that will m
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 12:22:05 +
2007 ---
One of PhB meaning is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_of_Philosophy
I th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 07:16:42 +
2007 ---
pseudo_daoist: Not that I know what PBH stands for but Points are still very
popula
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 06:57:18 +
2007 ---
>Because you will probably never have 1000 paragraphs on one page you will never
se
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 19:46:59 +
2007 ---
->bornmw: It might not make too much sense to have mm with two decimals.
Rounding e
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 18:57:35 +
2007 ---
I dont't think general users will ever understand what you've just said.
They don't
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 11:24:49 +
2007 ---
->bornmw: The internal unit is - as already stated - twip, 0,01763 mm. If you
set t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 11:03:24 +
2007 ---
Are you telling me that Writer adding 0.01mm for each formatting element is not
a d
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
User os changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
User mru changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78062
Issue #|78062
Summary|millimeter values corrupted
Component|Word processor
Version|OOo 2.2
Platfo
15 matches
Mail list logo
