[tools-issues] [Issue 64572] Do % targets that depend on % targets loose internal dependencies?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 24 15:48:33 -0700 2006 --- I just had a quick glance at the source, this: > * Document this feature and warn

[tools-issues] [Issue 64572] Do % targets that depend on % targets loose internal dependencies?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 24 07:39:00 -0700 2006 --- hmm, looks like my example still touched too much areas ;) how to solve: * Documen

[tools-issues] [Issue 64572] Do % targets that depend on % targets loose internal dependencies?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 21 12:24:54 -0700 2006 --- This has nothing to do with % targets. It works as coded and is related to issue 34

[tools-issues] [Issue 64572] Do % targets that depend on % targets loose internal dependencies?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572 User vq changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 64572] Do % targets that depend on % targets loose internal dependencies?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 21 11:30:55 -0700 2006 --- Even without caching I get (touch ttt; dmake.exe -v -rf percent.mk): dmake: Infer

[tools-issues] [Issue 64572] Do % targets that depend on % targets loose internal dependencies?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572 User vq changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 64572] Do % targets that depend on % targets loose internal dependencies?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 21 09:19:16 -0700 2006 --- "flagfile.x" is updated but the depndencies of "all" are checked against the file d

[tools-issues] [Issue 64572] Do % targets that depend on % targets loose internal dependencies?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572 User hjs changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 64572] Do % targets that depend on % targets loose internal dependencies?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572 User hjs changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 64572] Do % targets that depend on % targets loose internal dependencies?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572 User vq changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[tools-issues] [Issue 64572] Do % targets that depend on % targets loose internal dependencies?

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64572 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 20 09:37:51 -0700 2006 --- A recipe like: @$(NULL) is a system call with an empty string, who knows wh