To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User asrail changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 14:45:44 +
2007 ---
Issue confirmed on Linux PowerPC too
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 21 07:08:32 +
2007 ---
-HUB, please c/o the CWS unomacli64, the patches don't reflect the latest
state
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 21 14:36:05 +
2007 ---
with the whole workspace in m216 it works.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 18 15:24:03 +
2007 ---
I applied the last 2 patches to m216 and it fails with this:
ccache g++
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 10:44:58 +
2007 ---
Pavel, have you tried this already? Unfortunately takes a little time to set up
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 10:46:40 +
2007 ---
Yes. cws unomacli64 builds, but there still is another issue #i78284#.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 10:51:13 +
2007 ---
-Pavel, so #i78284# still happens on unomacli64 ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 10:56:29 +
2007 ---
yes, as I said there at the end of comment #1.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 07:40:55 +
2007 ---
Jkim, you are right, forget to check in the fixes for bridges and cppuhelper
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User kendy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 5 15:21:25 +
2007 ---
I checked in the fixes for the affine_uno bridge and triggered a build on
Solaris
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 00:03:16 +
2007 ---
kr: It seems there are some missing pieces. See the attachment.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 00:04:37 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45681)
Plug missing pieces.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User fridrich_strba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 14:39:23 +
2007 ---
kr: wrt. the patch, I did not try it yet did not look too well either, but
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 16:38:10 +
2007 ---
Confirmed the same horrible death on FreeBSD/amd64. :-(
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 16:52:28 +
2007 ---
Guys, I think the problem is basically solved, actually completely avoiding
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 1 16:20:35 +
2007 ---
dies on startup.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 1 16:19:43 +
2007 ---
With this patch applied, OOo dies horribly on x86_64.
here is the stack trace
#0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 31 07:07:25 +
2007 ---
@cmc: I see. salhelper/source/makefile.mk:1.26 similarly misses LINUXXgcc3,
with
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 31 07:39:49 +
2007 ---
-SB: Trying to avoid that va_copy altogether ...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 31 07:50:17 +
2007 ---
FWIW I'd be in favour of adding trickery, ? for i/l and ? for 4/8 where
relevant,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 31 09:45:25 +
2007 ---
-CMC: Actually I am more a fan of using some (env) variables to identify the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 31 09:56:34 +
2007 ---
I don't feel strongly about it, just so long as it doesn't become a huge
time-sink
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User maho changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 10:07:35 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 77909 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 10:09:07 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 77910 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 10:11:19 +
2007 ---
Pavel, I actually think that the maintenance burden is higher, if trying to use
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User hub changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 15:03:35 +
2007 ---
The same problem should already have arisen in older cppuhelper, for example,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 15:08:49 +
2007 ---
Going to fix this in unomacli64 ...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 16:12:05 +
2007 ---
cmc-sb: We accidentally entirely missed using a map for x86_64 in the other
case
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User jkim changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 23 09:33:40 +
2007 ---
Pavel, I just talked to Thorsten Behrens about adding dedicated map files (where
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 23 09:38:07 +
2007 ---
only the maintenance burden - only just for one letter/type difference in one
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:37:47 +
2007 ---
Pavel, it seems that sal_Int32 is mapped to int on x86-64 while it is mapped
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:43:56 +
2007 ---
kr: yes, it is intentional. It can't be long, because long is 8 bit on x86-64,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 07:47:30 +
2007 ---
Ahh, I think I understand: sal_Int32 being long on x86 is the bug. - I
would be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 21 03:48:49 +
2007 ---
With this, OOo compiles completely, but...
I build with many languages and in the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 19 06:06:58 +
2007 ---
Not that easy. The mapfile written this way would broke cppu build on Mac OS X
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 15:12:34 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45224)
The actual gcc linux x86-64 purpenvhelper
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 15:15:30 +
2007 ---
I added two patches:
* EnvStack.cxx.patch.final
* util_makefile.mk.patch.final
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
Issue #|77422
Summary|to-be-SRC680_m212: cppu compile issue in AffineBridge.
|cxx
Component|tools
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 10:57:35 +
2007 ---
gcc version 4.0.2 20050901 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 11:30:17 +
2007 ---
This should work:
#ifdef __va_copy
__va_copy (m_param, param);
#else
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 11:46:48 +
2007 ---
In EnvStack.cxx, the problem is:
uno_EnvCallee * pCallee = va_arg(param,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 11:49:54 +
2007 ---
So, is simple
uno_EnvCallee * pCallee = va_arg(param, uno_EnvCallee *);
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 12:22:23 +
2007 ---
Pavel,
your first fix regarding the use of __va_copy_ looks reasonable.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 13:12:57 +
2007 ---
Pavel, could you try the attached patch? It at least compiles on 32bit ... ;-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User kr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User kz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 17:17:10 +
2007 ---
Will do immediatelly after dinner - ~30 minutes.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 18:04:07 +
2007 ---
Yes, the patch fixed also the second break.
With fixed /tmp/AffineBridge.cxx I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=77422
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 18:25:20 +
2007 ---
BTW - contact me on IRC tomorrow - I'll give you remote ssh access to such
71 matches
Mail list logo
