To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 27 09:18:30 +
2008 ---
So - I've updated the patch in ooo-build (changes under JCA etc.) to actually
work
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 21 08:05:33 +
2008 ---
Applying slight modifications (fixing obvious errors; making sure *all* internal
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User aziem changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 3 15:38:22 +
2007 ---
@mmeeks:
- updated the patch: Is that updated patch available somewhere?
- move
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 9 13:20:03 +
2007 ---
updated the patch to move libexcept generation into cppu - to reflect the new
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 27 15:46:26 +
2007 ---
To prevent frustration among patch writers, all issues of type
PATCH are monitored
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 14:02:32 +
2007 ---
To prevent frustration among patch writers, all issues of type
PATCH are monitored
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User utomo99 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 11 08:26:47 -0700
2006 ---
Michael? target 2.1?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 10 03:08:04 -0700
2006 ---
I see, I had thought of sal/rtl/source/bootstrap.cxx instead. Anyway,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 24 07:01:51 -0700
2006 ---
- shlib.cxx: There is no get_this_libpath anywhere in sal
SRC680m160.
no ? not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 18 08:13:17 -0700
2006 ---
- shlib.cxx: There is no get_this_libpath anywhere in sal
SRC680m160.
no ? not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 12 07:51:50 -0700
2006 ---
Response to review comments:
- shlib.cxx, first #ifdef LINUX block: It should be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 6 13:45:50 -0700
2006 ---
As you like - I'll try to turn the patch around now ...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 5 00:30:21 -0700
2006 ---
.
-
Please do
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 5 04:55:23 -0700
2006 ---
Stefan - thanks for the review - a scad of serious problems with it :-) cool.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 5 05:07:33 -0700
2006 ---
Yup, I can take care of a CWS. Do we want to hurry and put this into 2.0.3 (I
am
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 3 04:47:59 -0700
2006 ---
So - numbers wise this gives me (from RTL_LOGFILE):
export OOO_DISABLE_INTERNAL=1
34 matches
Mail list logo