To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=38849
User jw changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=38849
User sus changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=38849
User sus changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=38849
User sus changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=38849
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 18:11:40 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46216)
New, less complex testcase document with "mis-nest
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=38849
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 24 18:09:40 +
2007 ---
mbayer->sus: I committed the changes you suggested to the TeX catalogue. Thanks
for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=38849
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 18 10:45:53 +
2007 ---
Workaround:
The input document structure might be enhanced by fixing the heading 1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=38849
User sus changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=38849
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 16 23:49:57 +
2007 ---
Problem still exists in OOo 2.2.1 B 9161 Linux i86 RPM.
-
