Hi,
for a given alsa device ("default", "dmix", "plughw:N", "hw:N,M",
"dspN", etc.), how do I automatically obtain the right device to use as
a audio mixer with that device? So far, it seems I can only attach to
"hw:N" mixer devices.
Thanks,
Ronald
-
Hi everybody,
Just wanted to share the status of the Emu10k1x driver (Dell SB Live!
Value). I've finally got PCM playback working at 48000khz and a 32Kb
buffer. I haven't tried too much more than this which is hard because of
lack of specs for the card.
I am doing some clean up and I hope to h
At Mon, 10 May 2004 16:51:24 +0200 (CEST),
Giuliano Pochini wrote:
>
>
> On 10-May-2004 Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> >> > Some drivers use spin_lock_irq() a lot, while others always use
> >> > spin_lock_irqsave(). I can't see the difference. When it's safe
> >> > using the _irq() version ?
> >>
> >>
On 10-May-2004 Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> > Some drivers use spin_lock_irq() a lot, while others always use
>> > spin_lock_irqsave(). I can't see the difference. When it's safe
>> > using the _irq() version ?
>>
>> Only when you know that you are not in interrupt context.
>
> also, not in the context
Clemens Ladisch wrote:
Rodrigo Severo wrote:
I have two Prolink PlayTV Pro capture cards (PV-BT878P+). One of them is
revision 8E and tthe other is revision 9F.
I tried to use both of them with the snd-bt87x driver. Both of them
returned only static.
Probably different mixer settings?
I tried
Rodrigo Severo wrote:
> I have two Prolink PlayTV Pro capture cards (PV-BT878P+). One of them is
> revision 8E and tthe other is revision 9F.
>
> I tried to use both of them with the snd-bt87x driver. Both of them
> returned only static.
Probably different mixer settings?
> I managed to get analo
At Sat, 08 May 2004 20:32:04 +0200,
Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on properifying the ALSA support in GNOME Volume Control.
> When opening a sound mixer, I noticed that several elements will be both
> a capture and a playback element. Also, there is separate functions for
> sett
At Sun, 9 May 2004 18:21:21 +0200,
Giuliano Pochini wrote:
>
> I read /linux/Documentation/firmware_class/README infos about the firmware
> loader. That loader is not used by any of the alsa drivers. Is there a
> reason ? Should I write my own custom loader or is it better using the
> firmware-cla
Hi James,
could you create a patch to the source
(alsa-kernel/Documentation/DocBook/writing-an-alsa-driver.tmpl)?
it's just a DocBook format. the tmpl extension is used to allow the
inclusion from the kernel source, although this document doesn't do
it.
thank,s
Takashi
At Sat, 08 May 2004 19
At Mon, 10 May 2004 10:31:07 +0200 (METDST),
Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>
> Giuliano Pochini wrote:
> > Some drivers use spin_lock_irq() a lot, while others always use
> > spin_lock_irqsave(). I can't see the difference. When it's safe
> > using the _irq() version ?
>
> Only when you know that you ar
Giuliano Pochini wrote:
> Some drivers use spin_lock_irq() a lot, while others always use
> spin_lock_irqsave(). I can't see the difference. When it's safe
> using the _irq() version ?
Only when you know that you are not in interrupt context.
Regards,
Clemens
11 matches
Mail list logo
