On Sun, 30 May 2004 08:35:21 -0500
Jan Depner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 04:09, Remi Bernhard wrote:
> > Hi Tim and all,
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 29 May 2004 16:34:49 +0200 (CEST)
> > Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > [Remi Bernhard]
> > > >I tried with kernel 2
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 04:09, Remi Bernhard wrote:
> Hi Tim and all,
>
>
> On Sat, 29 May 2004 16:34:49 +0200 (CEST)
> Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [Remi Bernhard]
> > >I tried with kernel 2.4.25 + lowlatency patch.
> > >I have the same xruns :-/
> > >
> > >Any other idea ?
> >
>
Hi Tim and all,
On Sat, 29 May 2004 16:34:49 +0200 (CEST)
Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Remi Bernhard]
> >I tried with kernel 2.4.25 + lowlatency patch.
> >I have the same xruns :-/
> >
> >Any other idea ?
>
> checklist:
>
> * running jackd as root? with -R option?
Tried -> failed.
[Jan Depner]
> Agreed. But the problem that keeps popping up on the lists is that
>people who are not doing live sound, have cards that do hardware
>monitoring, and don't need to use a tiny buffer size waste their time
>trying to get the minimum buffer size because they think they need to
>g
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 09:31, Tim Goetze wrote:
> depends on what 'system' we're talking about, which isn't really clear
> in the first place (nor is it too important, but here goes anyway ...
> :)
>
> you can see the whole setup as the system, then latency is the time
> from keypress to voltage c
[Remi Bernhard]
>I tried with kernel 2.4.25 + lowlatency patch.
>I have the same xruns :-/
>
>Any other idea ?
checklist:
* running jackd as root? with -R option?
* tried running jackd without any clients?
* IDE-DMA enabled?
* ll-sysctl interface chosen at kernel build time? turned it on?
* X run
[Jan Depner]
>On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 07:13, Tim Goetze wrote:
>> [Remi Bernhard]
>> >To be more sharp, i need to reduce latency because i use softsynth
>> >(zynaddsubfx, fluidsynth, etc.) that needs a low latency when playing
>> >from midi keyboard, and if not, there is a "lag" time, that man can
>
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 07:13, Tim Goetze wrote:
> [Remi Bernhard]
> >To be more sharp, i need to reduce latency because i use softsynth
> >(zynaddsubfx, fluidsynth, etc.) that needs a low latency when playing
> >from midi keyboard, and if not, there is a "lag" time, that man can
> >hear, between the
On Sat, 29 May 2004 13:44:40 +0200 (CEST)
Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Remi Bernhard]
> >So i have 2.6.5 kernel, and not 2.4.x. Do you think i should install
> >2.4.25 instead ?
>
> i do think so because i never saw any hard facts about latency posted
> for the 2.6 series, while 2.4.x
[Remi Bernhard]
>To be more sharp, i need to reduce latency because i use softsynth
>(zynaddsubfx, fluidsynth, etc.) that needs a low latency when playing
>from midi keyboard, and if not, there is a "lag" time, that man can
>hear, between the time when you hit the key, and the time it is played.
>
Hi,
> As far as minimizing buffer size is concerned - if
> you are doing live audio or you want to monitor recording with inboard
> effects turned on you need to have a small buffer size. With the
> envy24 chipset cards you can use hardware monitoring so you can set
> the buffer size to 2048 and
[Remi Bernhard]
>So i have 2.6.5 kernel, and not 2.4.x. Do you think i should install
>2.4.25 instead ?
i do think so because i never saw any hard facts about latency posted
for the 2.6 series, while 2.4.x-ll is well documented and proven to
work quite well here and elsewhere.
it _could_ also be
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 06:16, Remi Bernhard wrote:
> So i have 2.6.5 kernel, and not 2.4.x. Do you think i should install
> 2.4.25 instead ?
>
> >
> > (i gather that 2.4 is still the better choice for low-latency
> > operations.)
> >
>
> I read the alsa-* archives, and i saw a thread with two p
Hi,
On Sat, 29 May 2004 12:52:15 +0200 (CEST)
Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Remi Bernhard]
> >I read a lot a great thing about the audiophile 24/96 on the net, and
> >i decided to buy it to get better latency than my old sblive! I just
> >received the audiophile 24/96 and unfortunatl
[Remi Bernhard]
>I read a lot a great thing about the audiophile 24/96 on the net, and i
>decided to buy it to get better latency than my old sblive! I just
>received the audiophile 24/96 and unfortunatly, i have a lot of XRuns
>with when i run jackd.
my old system had various 2.4.x-ll kernels, as
Hello,
I read a lot a great thing about the audiophile 24/96 on the net, and i
decided to buy it to get better latency than my old sblive! I just
received the audiophile 24/96 and unfortunatly, i have a lot of XRuns
with when i run jackd.
I already tried the following :
- i changed irq (several
16 matches
Mail list logo
