Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA homepage redesign

2002-04-19 Thread Takashi Iwai
Hi, At Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:32:07 +0200, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > > Fred Gleason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be > > > frightened off by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into > > > thinking that 0.5 is the "safer" option.

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA homepage redesign

2002-04-18 Thread Bob Colwell
Here's what you get for leaving off the smiley -- until such time as software has fewer bugs than the hardware, the following is a cheap shot. -BobC if that's the stable release, people should be using kernel 1.2 on an 8086 (as everyone knows, that's the stable release of the pentium).

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA homepage redesign

2002-04-18 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Fred Gleason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be > > frightened off by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into > > thinking that 0.5 is the "safer" option. > > My understanding is that SuSE 8.0 is shipping with 0.9.0beta12. That's >

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA homepage redesign

2002-04-18 Thread James Courtier-Dutton
Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: >James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > > ><...> > > >>I think we should have a section on the web site for the different >>applications which support different alsa versions. >> >> >> > >N. could we please please please annihilate every last little >trace of alsa

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA homepage redesign

2002-04-18 Thread Fred Gleason
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, James Tappin wrote: > Is it perhaps time for an alsa-0.9.rc1 many people will be frightened off > by the beta designation, and certainly mislead into thinking that 0.5 is > the "safer" option. My understanding is that SuSE 8.0 is shipping with 0.9.0beta12. That's starting

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA homepage redesign

2002-04-18 Thread James Tappin
On Thursday 18 April 2002 18:27, Fred Gleason wrote: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: > > N. could we please please please annihilate every last little > > trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ? > > I'd like to add my vote for this here too. The whole 0.5.x vs. 0.9.x > thing is

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA homepage redesign

2002-04-18 Thread Fred Gleason
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote: > N. could we please please please annihilate every last little > trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ? I'd like to add my vote for this here too. The whole 0.5.x vs. 0.9.x thing is *hugely* confusing -- to me, to programmers, and to end users.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA homepage redesign

2002-04-18 Thread Juan Linietsky
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:18:51 +0200 Joern Nettingsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > > > <...> > > I think we should have a section on the web site for the different > > applications which support different alsa versions. > > > > N. could we please please ple

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] ALSA homepage redesign

2002-04-18 Thread Joern Nettingsmeier
James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > <...> > I think we should have a section on the web site for the different > applications which support different alsa versions. > N. could we please please please annihilate every last little trace of alsa 0.5.x from that page ? if that's the stable release,