-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
problem:
Code:
$ cat /proc/asound/cards
0 [AudioPCI ]: ENS1371 - Ensoniq AudioPCI
Ensoniq AudioPCI ENS1371 at 0x9c00, irq 11
1 [U0x46d0x8a2]: USB-Audio - USB Device 0x46d:0x8a2
USB Device 0x46d:0
Hello again!
Another question to this topic.
The upmix works fine now, but is it possible to upmix the micro-input too?
greets,
peter
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-
I'have try ubuntu(kernel-2.6.15 kernel-2.6.16) and
archlinux(kernel-2.6.16) with binary kernel or compile the source
myself with alsa module compilef as module or compilef into kernel.
And try compile alsa-driver from version(
1.0.9 1.0.10 1.0.11) seperately. But still there's no sound at all. H
I'have try ubuntu(kernel-2.6.15 kernel-2.6.16) and archlinux(kernel-2.6.16) with binary kernel or compile the source myself with alsa module compilef as module or compilef into kernel. And try compile alsa-driver from version(
1.0.9 1.0.10 1.0.11) seperately. But still there's no sound at all. H
Hi!
This seems to be a problem, not unheard of. I think it depends on your
hda-intel version and where it belongs to, if it works or not. They are still
working on it, as I heard. I had that problem myself. Perhaps try finding out
what you can about your special hda (version with lspci), where it
Hello,
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 01:30:12PM +0300, Niv wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> problem:
> Code:
> $ cat /proc/asound/cards
> 0 [AudioPCI ]: ENS1371 - Ensoniq AudioPCI
> Ensoniq AudioPCI ENS1371 at 0x9c00, irq 11
> 1 [U0x46d0x8a2
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 03:58 +0900, Joel Roth wrote:
>
> Here is a summary of some responses related to this
> question.
I posted about it on the Ubuntu list and the response from the
developers was that it's broken for apps to rely on a particular
soundcard ordering.
Here's the response I got f
Hi,
Does the current kernel-source (2.6.16.9) has the new ALSA 1.0.11?
I did not found any details looking at: http://www.kernel.org/ about the
new ALSA 1.0.11
I did a search with google:
alsa 1.0.11 site:http://www.kernel.org/
cheers,
--
Marcos Guglielmetti
* Director del desarrollo de M
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 19:39 +0200, Marcos Guglielmetti Gmail wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does the current kernel-source (2.6.16.9) has the new ALSA 1.0.11?
>
> I did not found any details looking at: http://www.kernel.org/ about the
> new ALSA 1.0.11
>
> I did a search with google:
>
> alsa 1.0.11 site:h
Lee Revell wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 22:45 +0300, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
"I don't understand .asoundrc syntax well enough to create one"
You make it sound like this is trivial functionality - it's not! Lots
of work by alsa-lib is required to transparently upmix stereo to 5.1
while hand
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:14:25 +1000
John Newbigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 22:45 +0300, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> >
> >>"I don't understand .asoundrc syntax well enough to create one"
> >
> >
> > You make it sound like this is trivial functional
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 02:20 +0300, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> My top wish on the wishlist is to never have a language whose parser
> reports no errors.
What are you talking about? The ALSA configuration parser certainly
does report errors.
Lee
-
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 09:14 +1000, John Newbigin wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 22:45 +0300, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> >
> >>"I don't understand .asoundrc syntax well enough to create one"
> >
> >
> > You make it sound like this is trivial functionality - it's not! Lots
El Lun 24 Abr 2006 00:57, Lee Revell escribió:
> On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 19:39 +0200, Marcos Guglielmetti Gmail wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does the current kernel-source (2.6.16.9) has the new ALSA 1.0.11?
> >
> > I did not found any details looking at: http://www.kernel.org/
> > about the new ALSA 1.0.1
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 20:36 +0200, Marcos Guglielmetti Gmail wrote:
> Ok, thanks. I think I will use the new Kernel 2.6.17, I think that
> it's
> better than use any old kernels and compile alsa-modules for them...
Well, if 2.6.17 not having been released yet is OK... ;-)
The version of ALSA in
El Lun 24 Abr 2006 01:42, Lee Revell escribió:
> On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 20:36 +0200, Marcos Guglielmetti Gmail wrote:
> > Ok, thanks. I think I will use the new Kernel 2.6.17, I think that
> > it's
> > better than use any old kernels and compile alsa-modules for
> > them...
>
> Well, if 2.6.17 not h
Hi,
If I upgrade alsa-base, linux-sound-base and libasound2 from
debian/sid, I got 1.0.11 versions.
It would be usefull to do this kind of upgrades?
&& will them work with my 1.0.10 kernel modules?
--
Marcos Guglielmetti
* Director del desarrollo de Musix GNU+Linux, 100% Software L
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 21:59 +0200, Marcos Guglielmetti Gmail wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I upgrade alsa-base, linux-sound-base and libasound2 from
> debian/sid, I got 1.0.11 versions.
>
> It would be usefull to do this kind of upgrades?
>
> && will them work with my 1.0.10 kernel modules?
>
AL
My motherbord chip is intel-945pm(ich7), and the codecs chip is alc882. It's a notebook make in china with a non-famous brand. 2006/4/23, Julien Claassen <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Hi! This seems to be a problem, not unheard of. I think it depends on your
hda-intel version and where it belongs to, if it
Hi,
anyone have answer to my quesry?
regards,
parag.
On 4/21/06, Parag N(पराग़) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
> On toshiba satellite laptop with FC5 system i got
> aplay -l output=>
>
> List of PLAY
Hi,
anyone have answer to my quesry?
regards,
parag.
On 4/21/06, Parag N(पराग़) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using Dual bootable system FC5 and RHEL4 on Toshiba Satellite
> Laptop. SO in an all talking in terms of kernel versions, i have
> 2.6.16 FC5 kernel,2.6.16-7 vanilla kernel,
21 matches
Mail list logo
