On Donnerstag, 19. April 2007, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
hi all !
My uptime in Linux doesn't really go over 2 days... why ?
Because there is some very deep driver issue with my audio hardware,
VIA 8237 audio.
That is when working, my sound system
On Freitag, 20. April 2007, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Donnerstag, 19. April 2007, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
hi all !
My uptime in Linux doesn't really go over 2 days... why ?
Because there is some very
On Sonntag, 18. Februar 2007, Vladimir Mosgalin wrote:
Can't say anything about loki games, but.. aren't they VERY old? Do they
ever work? I have Loki Demo CD with a few game demos on it, but it's
about 7 years old, I really doubt it ever works with modern glibc/other
components, not to
On Thursday 13 April 2006 14:26, David Bell wrote:
#alsamixer
alsamixer: function snd_ctl_open failed for default: No such device
I get this error because of:
a stale /etc/asound.state
a corrupted /etc/asound.state
have you tried removing it?
when alsamixer does not complain anymore, play
On Monday 20 February 2006 22:13, Colin Alie wrote:
Feb 19 18:01:06 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:08.0[A] -
GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 225 Feb 19 18:01:06 localhost kernel: AC'97 1
does not respond - RESET Feb 19 18:01:06 localhost kernel: AC'97 1 access
is not valid
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 02:39, Colin Alie wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:00:19 +0100
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 20 February 2006 22:13, Colin Alie wrote:
Feb 19 18:01:06 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:08.0[A]
- GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 21:09, Robert Persson wrote:
Another piece of advice I have just found very useful for solving mixer
problems has been to use gamix to tweak the settings. It is visually very
ugly, but it gives more detail than other mixers. This can be very useful.
For instance
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 05:04, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
Easy, isn't it?
Don't you think the same applies to you ?
If I'd be the troll, yes.
Sadly, the trolls are you and Bill, so it is not on me to stop.
---
This SF.net email is
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 18:11, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:35:05 +0100
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 05:04, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
Easy, isn't it?
Don't you think the same applies to you ?
If I'd be the troll
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 11:54, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
Sergei Steshenko wrote:
We have already discussed this, here's yet another opinion:
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/23/214258 -
This is why we need a kernel api and abi
(Score:2)
by Billly Gates (198444)
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 12:15, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
--
Giuliano.
Look, the device a piece of metal, with electric motor(s) and a piece
of plastic (the device PCB) on which the controller, which is also kind
of CPU for the device, is installed.
The CPU is also a CPU, which is
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 01:01, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:23:00 -0500
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 01:06 +0200, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
Again, if I remember correctly, Peter Zubaj said that ALSA developers
care
more about
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 02:15, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
The Linux developers DO NOT WANT to make it possible to write closed
source drivers. Many consider it a violation of the GPL.
- GPL allows to run commercial closed source programs under a
GPL'ed OS. That is, it doesn't prohibit
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 02:43, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 02:15, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
The Linux developers DO NOT WANT to make it possible to write closed
source drivers. Many consider it a violation of the GPL
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 02:52, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 17:34 -0800, Bill Unruh wrote:
Well, I also think that is a mistake. A Write once would also be far
more
stable as far as Linux itself is concerned. If every time the kernel
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:22, Bill Unruh wrote:
btw, X11 was able to talk to hardware without any kernel-drivers.
But it has to talk via the video card drivers which are kernel drivers I
would assume.
you may read up about Xfree86 3.6 and voodoo cards.
There was no need for kernel
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:22, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 02:43, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 02:15, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
The Linux developers DO
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 05:02, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
I was talking about the moral/ideological issue.
My point is that from moral/ideological point of view it doesn't make
sense to insist on OSS only in one case.
there is no moral issue.
Only a technical one.
drivers are run in kernel
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 07:04, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 03:03 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
btw, where are suddenly all this 'we need a fix binary abi' people are
coming
from?
Until ca 2 month ago they never spoke up
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 07:37, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 07:04, Bill Unruh wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 03:03 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
btw, where are suddenly all
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 07:37, Bill Unruh wrote:
?? And how many such suits have there been?
You are maybe going to take on Microsoft and see if their tcp stack
contains any of your GPL code ( you after all cannot sue for anyone else).
What is versin controll system
btw,
MS used the BSD
21 matches
Mail list logo
