On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Brian Kendig wrote:
> I've found what I believe might be a bug in the Alsa code in the Linux
> 2.6.[0-3] kernel, or at least is a problem with the Makefile. The
> problem is that if (in 'make menuconfig') I specify that the sequencer
> should be a module, I get a bunch of
I've found what I believe might be a bug in the Alsa code in the Linux
2.6.[0-3] kernel, or at least is a problem with the Makefile. The
problem is that if (in 'make menuconfig') I specify that the sequencer
should be a module, I get a bunch of errors when I try to make the
kernel. If I say t
Is there no out-of-tree build capability for 1.0.0rc2
for 2.6 kernels (i.e., no kbuild2 stuff in the
alsa-project tarballs)?
Dave
--- Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Mark Constable wrote:
>
> > Some queries about the latest 2.6 kernels...
> >
> > I presume the "
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Mark Constable wrote:
> Some queries about the latest 2.6 kernels...
>
> I presume the "alsa" part that comes with a 2.6 kernel is only
> the equiv of the alsa-driver package so do I still need to get
> alsa-lib and alsa-utils from somewhere else ?
Yes, from our main site - h
Some queries about the latest 2.6 kernels...
I presume the "alsa" part that comes with a 2.6 kernel is only
the equiv of the alsa-driver package so do I still need to get
alsa-lib and alsa-utils from somewhere else ?
If so, then do I have to determine which particular version is
in the kernel and
