Re: [Alsa-user] Re: driver 0.5.12a fails compile with arch=i486

2002-08-19 Thread Frank Barknecht
hi, Tom Whiting hat gesagt: // Tom Whiting wrote: > > > > > Try 'modprobe snd-ens1371' :) > > > Actually, for some damned reason, the Ensoniq card requires the Free OSS mixer > junk **boggle**. > Oddly enough, before adding all that, I got /dev/dsp no such device errors. > **shrug** > > Now to

Re: [Alsa-user] Re: driver 0.5.12a fails compile with arch=i486

2002-08-19 Thread Tom Whiting
> > Try 'modprobe snd-ens1371' :) > Actually, for some damned reason, the Ensoniq card requires the Free OSS mixer junk **boggle**. Oddly enough, before adding all that, I got /dev/dsp no such device errors. **shrug** Now to go through and rebuild everything to use alsa instead of OSS. --

Re: [Alsa-user] Re: driver 0.5.12a fails compile with arch=i486

2002-08-19 Thread Frans Ketelaars
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 03:53:04 -0500 Tom Whiting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Personally I'd suggest that a compile failure merits updating the > > tarballs on the front page - 0.9.0rc3a or something like that - because > > compilation failures are guaranteed to put people off ALSA for good. >

Re: [Alsa-user] Re: driver 0.5.12a fails compile with arch=i486

2002-08-19 Thread Tom Whiting
> Personally I'd suggest that a compile failure merits updating the > tarballs on the front page - 0.9.0rc3a or something like that - because > compilation failures are guaranteed to put people off ALSA for good. > Personally I'd suggest that a compile failure merits updating the > tarballs on th

[Alsa-user] Re: driver 0.5.12a fails compile with arch=i486

2002-08-18 Thread Adam Jones
On 18-Aug-02, Tom Whiting wrote: > On Sunday 18 August 2002 05:24 pm, Frans Ketelaars wrote: >> *** N.B. The 0.5.x series is considered deprecated and is no longer >> supported by ALSA developers *** > Sadly, the Release Candidates don't even compile on all machines I think Takashi's already spo