On Saturday 1 December 2007 02:15, Rene Herman wrote:
> Hey, don't apologise, I'm enjoying these messages. I do absolutely need to
> comment on that last bit there though as all the hype I'm _ever_ hearing is
> quite the other way around -- how old analogue is so obviously better then
> anything c
On Friday 30 November 2007 18:18, Bill Unruh wrote:
> > Nevertheless, from a "perceptual" point of view, reasonable amounts
> > of "analogue artifacts" (modulation) seems to be much more "benign"
> > to our ears (brain, actually) than most currently common levels of
> > "digital artifacts".
>
> Yo
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:40:20 +0100
Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01-12-07 06:12, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 02:15:55 +0100
> > Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 30-11-07 17:55, Paolo Saggese wrote:
> >>
> >>> This may seem (and should be) an
On 01-12-07 06:12, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 02:15:55 +0100
> Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 30-11-07 17:55, Paolo Saggese wrote:
>>
>>> This may seem (and should be) an obvious statement... was it not for
>>> the massive marketing hype trying (and often succee
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 02:15:55 +0100
Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30-11-07 17:55, Paolo Saggese wrote:
>
> > This may seem (and should be) an obvious statement... was it not for
> > the massive marketing hype trying (and often succeeding) to convince
> > everyone of the contrary. 8-
On 30-11-07 17:55, Paolo Saggese wrote:
> This may seem (and should be) an obvious statement... was it not for
> the massive marketing hype trying (and often succeeding) to convince
> everyone of the contrary. 8-)
>
> OK, we ended up quite OT... sorry.
Hey, don't apologise, I'm enjoying these m
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Paolo Saggese wrote:
>
> On Friday 30 November 2007 13:15, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>
>> I am sorry, but all the above said can be summarized in very few sentences:
>>
>> 1) any phase/frequency modulation produces a signal with infinite
>> spectrum;
> [...]
>
> well, sure... as
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:19:55 +0100
> Paolo Saggese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I am sorry, but all the above said can be summarized in very few sentences:
>
> 1) any phase/frequency modulation produces a signal with infinite
> spectrum;
On Friday 30 November 2007 13:15, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> I am sorry, but all the above said can be summarized in very few sentences:
>
> 1) any phase/frequency modulation produces a signal with infinite
> spectrum;
[...]
well, sure... as far as one knows what all that means. I tried
to expla
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:19:55 +0100
Paolo Saggese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
I am sorry, but all the above said can be summarized in very few sentences:
1) any phase/frequency modulation produces a signal with infinite
spectrum;
2) analog recordings additionally have jitter due to tape el
ouch, some mails from the list get caught in the spam filter.
This will be a very late answer... :-(
On Thursday 22 November 2007 20:49, you wrote:
> Just a random thought on jitter - if you like music recorded originally
> before the digital era - don't bother.
>
> I.e. analog tape recorder wow
11 matches
Mail list logo
