Richard, all: There are generally two approaches for discussions that
involve chartering a working group or rechartering one. (This is based on
my impressions, of course, so any errors are mine.) One way to do this is
to have individual speaking slots where interested folks make a pitch on
specif
Hi Vijay,
Making a single bulk slot instead of many small presentations for the
discussion makes a lot of sense. It is a good agenda.
Richard
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:54 AM Vijay Gurbani
wrote:
> All: The draft agenda is at [1]. Please note that requests for
> presentations of non-WG items
All: The draft agenda is at [1]. Please note that requests for
presentations of non-WG items were not honored since we will like to
provide the bulk of the second hour to the recharter discussion.
Please let Jan and me know of any changes to the agenda. Thanks.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/
ACK
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:05 AM wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
>
> I want to request a slot for path vector:
>
>
> Name of draft: draft-ietf-alto-path-vector-11
> Name of presenter: Kai Gao/Sabine Randriamasy
> Presentation time requested: 10 min
> Link to I-D: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-
Dear Richard, as you saw my previous response, this is TBD.
I will chat with Jan and Martin and send out some guidance on the mailing
list on how to structure the rechartering discussion slot.
Thanks,
- vijay
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 5:47 AM Y. Richard Yang wrote:
> Hi Vijay, Jan,
>
> A question
Hi Vijay,
according to your indications, I would like to request the following slots:
* slot 1*
Name of draft: Use of ALTO for Determining Service Edge
Name of presenter: Luis M. Contreras
Presentation time requested: 5 min
Link to I-D: draft-contreras-alto-service-edge-01
Note - this can be subj
