Re: problems with autoconf?

2001-08-16 Thread f.johan.beisser
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, John R. Jackson wrote: > >i'm using GNU autoconf, version 2.52 to attempt (heh) to get the configure > >script to work on the CVS version of amanda 2.5.0.. and i keep running in > >to errors. > > Wow. Three problems in only one sentence :-). compression technology limits m

Re: guh. new problem?

2001-08-16 Thread f.johan.beisser
quot; Amanda Tape Server Host Check - Holding disk /usr/dumps: 930872 KB disk space available, that's plenty amcheck-server: slot 1: date 20010816 label DailySet1-001 (active tape) amcheck-server: fatal slot chio:: /dev/ch0: CHIOMOVE: Invalid argument ERRO

Re: guh. new problem?

2001-08-16 Thread John R. Jackson
>but, the output from AMANDAs server seems to be ok.. > >FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: > hi /usr/home lev 0 FAILED [disk /usr/home offline on hi.hostname?] Before you try working with amdump, you should use amcheck. It does a better job of diagnosing problems. Also, if it's not happy, you

Re: problems with autoconf?

2001-08-16 Thread John R. Jackson
>i'm using GNU autoconf, version 2.52 to attempt (heh) to get the configure >script to work on the CVS version of amanda 2.5.0.. and i keep running in >to errors. Wow. Three problems in only one sentence :-). First, you don't run autoconf yourself to build Amanda. As described in the FAQ (www.

Need some sample MTX output

2001-08-16 Thread John R. Jackson
I'm working on cleanup and enhancements to the chg-zd-mtx script (actually, all of the sh driven scripts) based on trouble some folks have had recently. But mtx on my system is problematic (I'm not sure they ever considered a robot with ~800 slots :-). So, I'm looking for some sample output from

Re: starttime weirdness

2001-08-16 Thread peanut butter
Thanks for the info. . . . > You said you didn't give Amanda a holding disk (in the initial setup), > but I suspect what you meant was you gave it a tiny one. My guess is > Amanda saw at least one estimate for your delayed host that would fit > and so everything that would not fit (which was the

problems with autoconf?

2001-08-16 Thread f.johan.beisser
i'm using GNU autoconf, version 2.52 to attempt (heh) to get the configure script to work on the CVS version of amanda 2.5.0.. and i keep running in to errors. [jan@hi amanda] {726} autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.52 [jan@hi amanda] {727} autoconf configure.in:7: error: possibly un

RE: Waiting for ack

2001-08-16 Thread James Stevens
<-- Snip -->> What RPMs did you update? Did you setup some firewalling by default? <-- Snip -->> Boy I wish I could answer that one. RedHat has made it so simple to keep your system updated using the RedHat Network that I no longer have to manually update the system. Hence I'm kind of oblivious

Re: Waiting for ack

2001-08-16 Thread Bernhard R. Erdmann
> I am having difficulties in running amanda. I am unable to get a backup (but > once was) and I think it was after updating some RPM on my system. It takes > 30 minutes to fail and the only info I can find in in the amandad.debug file > on the client. I get 4 lines of > amandad: waiting for ack

Re: tapeio branch: using smaller files?

2001-08-16 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
This particular one is not a FAQ, yet. Because tapeio is not in common use, yet. The 2 GB file limit question is a FAQ when asked in regard to holding disk files and in regard to amrestore, and each situation has a somewhat different answer. There is a config option that works around the probl

more on the lil client problem..

2001-08-16 Thread f.johan.beisser
forgot to include some output from amadmin.. gump# su amanda -c "amadmin daily disklist hi.hostname /usr/home" line 12: host hi.hostname: interface default disk /usr/home: program "DUMP" priority 2 dumpcycle 0 maxdumps 1 strategy STANDARD

guh. new problem?

2001-08-16 Thread f.johan.beisser
thanks to the many helpful answers i've had on this list.. but sadly, i need more help. this time, it seems the problem is client side.. so far, i've gotten most things working, the server side is now able to create and handle the dumps, but it doesn't seem that i'm able to get the client side w

Re: [GNUTAR program not available]

2001-08-16 Thread fil krohnengold
At Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:28:27 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... : Was gnutar installed *before* amanda? Look in /tmp/amanda/amandad*debug : -- there should be a line that says "GNUTAR=/bin/tar" or some such. If : not, configure didn't find it and you need to recompile/reinstall amanda. Indeed. Th

RE: Waiting for ack

2001-08-16 Thread James Stevens
Thanks for the reply! All help is greatly appreciated! I have checked both the server and client machines for the services. They are auto starting. I have even restarted xinetd. As far as the RPM updates, Amanda was not one of them so the amanda.rpmnew file did not exist. I don't think it is tc

tapeio branch: using smaller files?

2001-08-16 Thread Dan Debertin
This probably falls under the "why can't I split my backups across multiple tapes?" FAQ, but maybe not. I'm using the file: driver from the tapeio branch to back up a large filesystem to another disk. The system that I'm using (Linux) doesn't support files larger than 2GB, which is causing backup

Re: [GNUTAR program not available]

2001-08-16 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 at 2:25pm, fil krohnengold wrote > Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check > > ERROR: diglib1: [GNUTAR program not available] > Client check: 16 hosts checked in 1.274 seconds, 1 problem found > > (brought to you by Amanda 2.4.2p2) > {amanda}hammond:~

Re: Waiting for ack

2001-08-16 Thread Christopher McCrory
Hello... James Stevens wrote: > I am having difficulties in running amanda. I am unable to get a backup (but > once was) and I think it was after updating some RPM on my system. It takes > 30 minutes to fail and the only info I can find in in the amandad.debug file > on the client. I get 4 line

Re: [GNUTAR program not available]

2001-08-16 Thread John R. Jackson
>ERROR: diglib1: [GNUTAR program not available] This message means GNU tar could not be found (maybe it was not installed yet) when ./configure was run for Amanda. Now that you have GNU tar available, remove config.cache (or "make distclean") and start the Amanda build over again. >bash-2.02$ t

[GNUTAR program not available]

2001-08-16 Thread fil krohnengold
Howdy - I've been running v2.4.2p2 with great results for Solaris 2.6 and 7 machines. I've added several client machines along with way without a hitch - until now. I just added a new machine - a Sun E250 runing Sol2.6. I need to use tar because the folks who run that machine refused to foll

Re: Trouble using amrecover. . .(Long Message)

2001-08-16 Thread John R. Jackson
In your dd tests you always rewind the tape first. Did you rewind the tape before doing the amrecover? Amidxtaped does not rewind on the off chance you've pre-positioned the tape to the appropriate image. John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Waiting for ack

2001-08-16 Thread James Stevens
I am having difficulties in running amanda. I am unable to get a backup (but once was) and I think it was after updating some RPM on my system. It takes 30 minutes to fail and the only info I can find in in the amandad.debug file on the client. I get 4 lines of amandad: waiting for ack: Connecti

Trouble using amrecover. . .(Long Message)

2001-08-16 Thread Anthony Valentine
ity: remote host sbs.sbs.com user root local user amanda amandahosts security check passed > 6 amrestore_nargs=6 > -h > -p > /dev/rmt0.1 > sbs > ^/home$ > 20010816 Ready to execv amrestore with: path = /usr/local/sbin/amrestore argv[0] = "amrestore" argv[1] = "-h&quo

Re: tapetype running for 8 days !?

2001-08-16 Thread John R. Jackson
>Do you have an idea, whether the long time for tapetype can be ok? Is there >any possibility to check, whether the program runs correctly? If you're using 2.4.2p2, then it's not running properly, and I'd be very suspicious of the drive or the kernel driver. >Thomas. John R. Jackson, Technical

RE: tapetype running for 8 days !?

2001-08-16 Thread Thomas Eisenzopf
I´m using the latest release, so the newest tapetype is used. Unfortunately the mailing list archive is temporarily unavailable, and the ftp archive is out of date. Generally, the drive is a rather cheap drive, but as far as I read it shouldn´t be so bad. Do you have an idea, whether the long t

Re: regenerating an amanda report

2001-08-16 Thread Bill Carlson
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, David Carter wrote: > Hello all, > > I didn't receive a mail report this morning from amanda, although I can see > that the backups completed successfully, and the tape contents look good. > > Is there a way I can re-generate the amdump report that I usually get via > email?

Re: Configuration

2001-08-16 Thread John R. Jackson
>I have not formatted the tape or ever succesfully mounted the tape drive to >/backup (which is where I want it). Ummm, I'm guessing you've probably also not used tapes with Unix much, either :-). Tapes do not need to be formatted like disks, i.e. there is nothing like mkfs/newfs involved. Also

Re: "could not access" using tar

2001-08-16 Thread John R. Jackson
>... My only guess >is that amanda is denied access because this home directory only gives >permissions to the user ... That's the right guess. Amcheck (actually, selfcheck) does not run as root so cannot get there. The actual backup will run GNU tar as root (under runtar) and so should be OK.

Re: tapetype running for 8 days !?

2001-08-16 Thread John R. Jackson
>I?m preparing to use amanda ... What version? The tapetype program with 2.4.2* is much better than the one with 2.4.1*. And if you're just starting with Amanda, you should be starting with the latest release (2.4.2p2). >... therefore I use the tapetype command because >my tapedrive (OnStream

The Endless Estimate

2001-08-16 Thread Bill Delphenich
I have been having some problems with Amanda lately. After doing some tweaking with it yesterday, I ran it from the command prompt, using the same command I have in the cron file for the user amanda. I have it backing up itself and another server. All servers are running RH Linux, and Amanda had b

Re: Amanda + Solaris 8 + StorEdge L9

2001-08-16 Thread Christian Doppler
Hi, Thank's for pointing me to mtx, now it works. And yes I was using the sgen from Sol 8 but wanted to go with amanda stuff only ( chg-scsi ). Thank's again servus cd > > Quoting Christian Doppler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > I'm having problems getting that combination running. > > > > Ama