On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:17:31PM -0800, Will Lowe wrote:
> Is there a way to specify a file of patterns to include rather than to
> exclude with the GNUTAR type? Here's the scenario:
>
In 2.4.3, check man amanda for "include", much like "exclude".
--
Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PRO
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:05:51AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 04 January 2003 18:42, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:35:48PM -0600, Douglas K. Rand wrote:
> >>
> >> ... . Amanda didn't care if the
> >> exclude file was there or not, and actually gnu-tar didn't care
>
On Sunday 05 January 2003 00:24, C. Bensend wrote:
>Comments inline.
>
>On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 06:45:51PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I've been told, and have repeated here, that the mtimes of a
>> file are not supported by samba because they are not supported
>> by the underlying (usually vfat)
On Saturday 04 January 2003 18:42, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:35:48PM -0600, Douglas K. Rand wrote:
>> >> > > > And did you put a file "exclude.gtar" in there?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Yes, I did, and that got rid of the message. But if
>> >> > > amanda needs this file, why does
Comments inline.
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 06:45:51PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> I've been told, and have repeated here, that the mtimes of a file
> are not supported by samba because they are not supported by the
> underlying (usually vfat) file system. So apparently, some dummy
> value g
Is there a way to specify a file of patterns to include rather than to
exclude with the GNUTAR type? Here's the scenario:
I have a whole lot of Debian boxes. There's no need to back up
everything on the filesystem since a lot of it is easily reconstructed
via apt ... everything in /usr/bin, for
>> >> [Doug whining because he has to create those empty exlude files ...]
Jean-Louis> You can use the keyword 'optional' on your exclude
Jean-Louis> specification and amanda will not complain if the file
Jean-Louis> doesn't exist. You don't have to create empty files.
>> Cool! I don't see the pa
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:38:43PM -0600, Douglas K. Rand wrote:
> >> [Doug whining because he has to create those empty exlude files ...]
>
> Jean-Louis> You can use the keyword 'optional' on your exclude
> Jean-Louis> specification and amanda will not complain if the file
> Jean-Louis> doesn't e
On Saturday 04 January 2003 14:15, C. Bensend wrote:
>Hey folks,
>
> I'm having an odd problem with one of my backup clients.
>Every single night (I back up nightly), one particular partition
>ends up with a "STRANGE" report, saying that a file (pick a file,
>any file) has changed while it wa
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:35:48PM -0600, Douglas K. Rand wrote:
> >> > > > And did you put a file "exclude.gtar" in there?
> >> > >
> >> > > Yes, I did, and that got rid of the message. But if amanda needs this
> >> > > file, why doesn't it just create it?
> >> >
> >> > Because it is a file
>> [Doug whining because he has to create those empty exlude files ...]
Jean-Louis> You can use the keyword 'optional' on your exclude
Jean-Louis> specification and amanda will not complain if the file
Jean-Louis> doesn't exist. You don't have to create empty files.
Cool! I don't see the particul
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:35:48PM -0600, Douglas K. Rand wrote:
>
> Jon> Perhaps it is an added extra check that that should have been in
> Jon> 2.4.2. Extra checking is not a bad thing.
> Jon> The file is not necessary.
>
> I really liked how it behaved in 2.4.2. You told Amanda to tell
> gn
>> > > > And did you put a file "exclude.gtar" in there?
>> > >
>> > > Yes, I did, and that got rid of the message. But if amanda needs this
>> > > file, why doesn't it just create it?
>> >
>> > Because it is a file you create specifying what you want to exclude.
>> > If you don't want to us
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 12:21:44PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> Some more data points from a 2.4.2 user.
>
> The "exclude list" option is defined in the root-tar dumptype in both
> 2.4.2 and 2.4.3. So no change there. No surprises for anyone.
>
> amcheck in my installation (2.4.2) does not compl
Hey folks,
I'm having an odd problem with one of my backup clients.
Every single night (I back up nightly), one particular partition
ends up with a "STRANGE" report, saying that a file (pick a file,
any file) has changed while it was being read.
The stats:
Client: OpenBSD 3.2-ST
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:55:37AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 04 January 2003 03:03, Frank Smith wrote:
> >--On Friday, January 03, 2003 22:18:18 -0500 "John R. Jackson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> >>> Just curious as why some of the defaults are the way they are.
> >>
> >
On Saturday 04 January 2003 03:03, Frank Smith wrote:
>--On Friday, January 03, 2003 22:18:18 -0500 "John R. Jackson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is there a reason indexing isn't on by default? They don't
>>> really take up that much space ...
>>
>> I beg to differ:
>>
>> $ du -sk /var/amand
--On Friday, January 03, 2003 22:18:18 -0500 "John R. Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there a reason indexing isn't on by default? They don't really take up
>> that much space ...
>
> I beg to differ:
>
> $ du -sk /var/amanda/index/champion
> 4641743 /var/amanda/index/champion
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
