On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 07:25:50PM +0100, Chris Karakas wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >
> > While I agree basically with you there can be cases where the scheduler
> > fights a specific situation. Suppose my Level 0's are 9-10 GB total
> > and I'm using a DDS2 tape with 4GB capacity with a dumpcy
Here is the scenario. I have a cluster of machines at home thta I've had
Amanda working on for years. I even had to go through the protocol
conversion. Ot's been working well for all these years.
Last weelend I decided to move the Amanda tape/index server from an HP-UX
10.20 9000/835 to and Athal
>Recently, one of my servers (a Linux RH machine) had its hard drive
>crash. We installed a new drive, Red Hat, then re-installed the AMANDA
>client, and just kept the same disklist, etc. on the backup server.
>After re-installing the client, AMANDA reported the following errors
>when trying to bac
Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
> While I agree basically with you there can be cases where the scheduler
> fights a specific situation. Suppose my Level 0's are 9-10 GB total
> and I'm using a DDS2 tape with 4GB capacity with a dumpcycle of 3 days.
> Works well for a single tape/dump usage with the Level 0
>I guess I should list more of the alternative names ...
>in .amandahosts...
>
>Question: Can I use regexps in the file?
No.
>- Toralf
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I can't seem to find thisn in configure --help on .4.3B4, am I missing it?
It no longer exists. The debug files now have a datestamp as part of
the name to keep them unique:
$ ls /var/amanda/tmp
amandad.20030108133530.debug
amandad.20030108134013.debug
amandad.20030108134118.debug
ama
* Joshua Baker-LePain ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030117 16:54] thus spake:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 at 4:17pm, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote
>
> > So after going through some index files and cleaning them and
> > verifying that amrecover can deal with them I wonder what else might
> > have gone wrong usin
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 03:16:24PM +0100, Chris Karakas wrote:
> DK Smith wrote:
> > Do most amanda configs (with changers) run amdump every weekday (M-F) and skip
>running amdump on weekends? I see this sort of idiom stated as "the way" for Amanda,
>however I am not so sure this well-documented
DK Smith wrote:
> Do most amanda configs (with changers) run amdump every weekday (M-F) and skip
>running amdump on weekends? I see this sort of idiom stated as "the way" for Amanda,
>however I am not so sure this well-documented idiom is actually used in practice. Or
>is it?
>
Well, I use AMA
On Friday 17 January 2003 21:13, DK Smith wrote:
>I finally determined why my tape order is not what I expected. (by
> looking at the tapelist file). I do not recall why my tape order
> managed to get into this state... When I originally set things
> up, *i thought* the tapes were in order...
>
>I
Hi all;
I've got a weird one going on here. I ran a 3 days without tape
test to check amflush after Jon had a problem, and it worked just
fine, flushing to a total of 4 tapes to do it all.
Now I want to repeat that test, but this time I was going to let the
autoflush option handle it. Buit I
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, John Martinez wrote:
>
> Does Amanda support OS X clients? I plan on installing Amanda on a Solaris server.
>
> In particular, I'd like to know if there is support for multi-forked files in
> HFS+ filesystems.
You need to use a local backup utility that's resource fork awa
12 matches
Mail list logo
