Hi,
the speed of our hp surestore seems to be ok, but the amdump takes too much time
(6 hours for 23 GB, we want to use now client fast compression).
So we have a suspicion (someone just has installed it, but this person is not
here any more :-(:
In amanda.conf:
netusage 600 Kbps # maximum
Lars Segerlund schrieb:
have you checked the options for parrallell dumpers ?
Yes i have 4.
You should be able to have multiple connections to clients, and your
time seem's looong !
We have just one client (the file server) and the backup server.
And the interface-values and
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:55:32PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 09:05, hochenaw wrote:
we have an HP Surestore dlt vs80e and use hp dlt IV tapes (capacity
40/80GB) under linux.
...
How can i activate software or hardware compression (cant find an
entry in
dalton on Fri 24/01 09:59 +0100:
But we have a 100mbit LAN, so there should be 10240 kbps, thats right?
just being picky,
$ bc -ql
100 * (2^10)^2 / 8 / 2^10
12800.
:) of course if you actually hit that wire speed I'll be amazed.
Hi,
I'm using tar for backup, but my DLEs refer to device names. For
example,
henry /dev/sda1 root-tar
henry /dev/sda2 user-tar
I'm also trying to use exclude lists, but these don't seem to be working
as I would expect them to (it looks like they're being ignored).
The
Harri Haataja on Fri 24/01 12:31 +0200:
Hardware depends on the os in use. Some os's have a choice of
compressed or uncompressed drives in the device list and will turn
the drives compression on and off according to the devicename you
used to address it. Linux does not however, so one
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 01:20:04PM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Simon Young wrote:
The question is, should I be refering to paths rather than devices when
using tar? Like this:
henry / root-tar
henry /usruser-tar
Yes. You may even use path for if you use dump
On Friday 24 January 2003 05:31, Harri Haataja wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:55:32PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 09:05, hochenaw wrote:
we have an HP Surestore dlt vs80e and use hp dlt IV tapes
(capacity 40/80GB) under linux.
...
How can i activate software
On Friday 24 January 2003 05:35, Scott Mcdermott wrote:
dalton on Fri 24/01 09:59 +0100:
But we have a 100mbit LAN, so there should be 10240 kbps, thats
right?
just being picky,
$ bc -ql
100 * (2^10)^2 / 8 / 2^10
12800.
:) of course if you actually hit that wire speed I'll
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
E-mail Premium BOL
Antivírus, anti-spam e até 100 MB de espaço. Assine já!
http://email.bol.com.br/
On Friday 24 January 2003 06:00, Simon Young wrote:
Hi,
I'm using tar for backup, but my DLEs refer to device names. For
example,
henry /dev/sda1 root-tar
henry /dev/sda2 user-tar
I'm also trying to use exclude lists, but these don't seem to be
working as I would expect them to
Hi!
I've run tapetype on a LTO Ultrium drive and some questions concerning
the results. The tapetype test has been made twice, once with
hardware compression (HC) turned on (by mistake) and once with HC
turned off.
The OS is Linux and 'mt' is telling me actually:
# mt -f /dev/nst0
Gene Heskett on Fri 24/01 08:34 -0500:
But we have a 100mbit LAN, so there should be 10240 kbps, thats
right?
$ bc -ql
100 * (2^10)^2 / 8 / 2^10
12800.
I don't believe this is quite correct. Thats a serial protocol, and
AFAIK it still uses start and stop bits,
And if any of us can RELIABLY exceed 30 percent usage on
an Ethernet network, I want to see it.
For networks, plan on using about 10 percent of the available
bandwidth in your capacity planning and you should be safe.
For 10 Mbit Ethernet, figure 100 KB/sec,
for 100 Mbit Ethernet, figure 1
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 09:59:48AM +0100, dalton wrote:
Hi,
the speed of our hp surestore seems to be ok, but the amdump takes too much
time (6 hours for 23 GB, we want to use now client fast compression).
So we have a suspicion (someone just has installed it, but this person is
not
On Friday 24 January 2003 08:53, Martin Oehler wrote:
Hi!
I've run tapetype on a LTO Ultrium drive and some questions
concerning the results. The tapetype test has been made twice,
once with hardware compression (HC) turned on (by mistake) and
once with HC turned off.
The OS is Linux and
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:53:26PM +0100, Martin Oehler wrote:
Hi!
I've run tapetype on a LTO Ultrium drive and some questions concerning
the results. The tapetype test has been made twice, once with
hardware compression (HC) turned on (by mistake) and once with HC
turned off.
The OS
--On Friday, January 24, 2003 08:45:24 -0500 Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 24 January 2003 06:00, Simon Young wrote:
Hi,
I'm using tar for backup, but my DLEs refer to device names. For
example,
henry /dev/sda1 root-tar
henry /dev/sda2 user-tar
I'm also
Hi!
Am Fre, 2003-01-24 um 16.22 schrieb Gene Heskett:
On Friday 24 January 2003 08:53, Martin Oehler wrote:
Why is the length the same? Seems like switching the compression
modes with mt is not working.
It was still on? You didn't say that you had turned it back off
above. Maybe this
Hi, Jon!
Am Fre, 2003-01-24 um 16.27 schrieb Jon LaBadie:
Maybe you hit what Gene describes in another posting today.
Once a tape has been written to with HW compression, the drive senses it
and automatically switches to HW compression regardless of settings.
No, I made a mistake (see my
My server is running Amanda 2.4.3 (Solaris 2.6)
My client (that is having problems) is running Amanda-2.4.1p1 (Solaris
2.6)
Due to the size of some of my volume mount points, I have 56 volume
entries in my disk list for this server (out of 183 total). I am having
amdump fail with the message:
Hello,
* Martin Oehler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030124 11:52] thus spake:
Hi, Jon!
Am Fre, 2003-01-24 um 16.27 schrieb Jon LaBadie:
Maybe you hit what Gene describes in another posting today.
Once a tape has been written to with HW compression, the drive senses it
and automatically
On 24 Jan 2003 at 5:11pm, Martin Oehler wrote
I'm sorry, I made a mistake. The hardware compression was off
all the time. :(
# mt -f /dev/nrmt0 datcompression 0
Compression off.
# mt -f /dev/nrmt0 datcompression 1
Compression off.
For my AIT drives, I use 'mt compression 0' and 'mt
Hello
I am configuring amanda-2.4.2p2-9 for a changer HP Ultrium LTO 1 (composed of
6 slots) and I have the following problem : the tape in the next slot is not
automatically loaded
The main lines of the configuration files are the following :
== amanda.conf
runtapes 6
tpchanger
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 08:31:19AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if any of us can RELIABLY exceed 30 percent usage on
an Ethernet network, I want to see it.
Well, one of my amanda clients does two dumps in parallel over 100BaseT
at =3MB/s dumper rate (each) every single night. Does that
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 at 7:04pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I am configuring amanda-2.4.2p2-9 for a changer HP Ultrium LTO 1 (composed of
6 slots) and I have the following problem : the tape in the next slot is not
automatically loaded
The exact model would be helpful. Also, note that pre-built
Anne,
I don't know what you mean by automatically loaded. My experience
and recent discussion on this list both show that the current tape
remains in the drive at the completion of the amanda run, just as
the current tape remains in the drive at the completion of an amanda
run that does not
On Friday 24 January 2003 10:34, Frank Smith wrote:
[...]
If both the above examples are the same system (i.e. / is
/dev/sda1 and /usr is /sda2), then using / for a DLE won't
include /usr. Dump limits itself to a single filesystem, and
gnutar is called with the --one-file-system option so it
On Friday 24 January 2003 11:11, Martin Oehler wrote:
Hi!
Am Fre, 2003-01-24 um 16.22 schrieb Gene Heskett:
On Friday 24 January 2003 08:53, Martin Oehler wrote:
Why is the length the same? Seems like switching the
compression modes with mt is not working.
It was still on? You didn't say
On Friday 24 January 2003 12:11, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hello,
* Martin Oehler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20030124 11:52] thus
spake:
Hi, Jon!
Am Fre, 2003-01-24 um 16.27 schrieb Jon LaBadie:
Maybe you hit what Gene describes in another posting today.
Once a tape has been written
On Friday 24 January 2003 13:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I am configuring amanda-2.4.2p2-9 for a changer HP Ultrium LTO 1
(composed of 6 slots) and I have the following problem : the tape
in the next slot is not automatically loaded
The main lines of the configuration files are the
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 at 2:44pm, Gene Heskett wrote
speaking) drive. I'm noteing that Martins drive claimed it needed
a 545 kilobyte filemark. That, to me with zero experience with
either drive, still seems highly excessive.
Well, given that tapetype reported a 5577 kbytes filemark for by
On Friday 24 January 2003 15:19, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 at 2:44pm, Gene Heskett wrote
speaking) drive. I'm noteing that Martins drive claimed it
needed a 545 kilobyte filemark. That, to me with zero
experience with either drive, still seems highly excessive.
Well,
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 07:04:23PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I am configuring amanda-2.4.2p2-9 for a changer HP Ultrium LTO 1 (composed of
6 slots) and I have the following problem : the tape in the next slot is not
automatically loaded
The main lines of the configuration
Responding to myself :)
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:50:19AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Ran an amflush that for the first time was greater than
a single tape capacity. Amflush knows about my changer
(shifted to the correct tape) and my config has runtapes
set to 2 (this has worked for
the speed of our hp surestore seems to be ok, but the amdump takes too
much time (6 hours for 23 GB, we want to use now client fast
compression).
How fast can you get data off of your disks? If that 23G is one
filesystem, you might consider splitting it up so that Amanda can
schedule it more
You try to recover from the device PSI_ASM_DailySet130,
amrestore expect a device name, not a label.
Use the settape command in amrecover (eg. settape /dev/nst0)
Jean-Louis
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:26:57AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello there,
I've managed to get a tapeless backup
Anyone have experience with Amanda on Redhat with an IBM DDS/4 Autoloader? I read that Amanda didn't like autoloaders - just curious. If not, anyone know another product that can deal with this druve under Linux?
-JohnDo you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
On Friday 24 January 2003 19:24, John Cunningham wrote:
Anyone have experience with Amanda on Redhat with an IBM DDS/4
Autoloader? I read that Amanda didn't like autoloaders - just
curious. If not, anyone know another product that can deal with
this druve under Linux?
Dunno about the IBM
On Friday 24 January 2003 16:22, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Responding to myself :)
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:50:19AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Ran an amflush that for the first time was greater than
a single tape capacity. Amflush knows about my changer
(shifted to the correct tape) and my config
40 matches
Mail list logo
