Leonid Mamchenkov wrote:
JBL Just add:
JBL
JBL exclude ./local
JBL
JBL to your dumptype for /usr. See the example disklist and/or amanda.conf
JBL for examples.
And you don't even need to modify the full dumptype, if you have
a recent amanda version (at least 2.4.3). You now can define a
Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I posted a couple of messages about amflush hanging after
installing the libc/kernel updates to RedHat 9.
By hang, do you mean consume 100% of CPU for days on end?
Yes, I am seeing that on RH9. Nice to know I am not alone.
Thanks for the tip about
On Friday 30 May 2003 05:27, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Now the client is a bit slow, a 500mhz K6-III, so I expected the
level 0's this would cause would take a while. This also brought
my disklist entries up to 44. The string that controls the
dumporder in amanda.conf:
Title: Dump too big for tape
Hi all -
Well, here I am againsame server different issue. My backups are still failing on that client with a timeout and I'm still searching to figure out why. But that's not why I'm here today. Running amanda 2.4.2p2 on a RH8 box with a seagate stand
Resent on the list Jon, I'm bouncing again
On Friday 30 May 2003 04:07, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:15:54AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Hi everybody;
Now the client is a bit slow, a 500mhz K6-III, so I expected the
level 0's this would cause would take a while. This also
On Fri, 30 May 2003 at 9:30am, Rebecca Pakish Crum wrote
Total Full Daily
Estimate Time (hrs:min)0:02
Run Time (hrs:min) 3:57
Dump Time (hrs:min)0:58 0:58 0:00
Output
Nope, that's normal. Output Size is the size of all the dump
images.
Remember that amanda puts a 32KB header on each of those
before they go to
tape. 10 filesystems * 32KB is 320KB, or about .3 MB. QED.
Yeah, output size should be fine...not even 6 gigs on a 12 gig tape that
used to
On Fri, 30 May 2003 at 9:47am, Rebecca Pakish Crum wrote
Well, how big is that /var?
From yesterday's report:
isymmdb /var 0176096 176096 --0:59 2985.8 2:43
1079.7
Yes, but how big is it today? :)
Check in last night's amdump.N file (should be amdump.1) to see
Ok my amandahosts file looks like this.
dilmom.as400resource.com amanda
I have run the following
chown amanda.amanda /home/amanda/.amandahosts
and
chmod 600 /home/amanda/.amandahosts
and this is what I get from amcheck
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
Holding disk
Hi,
I have a backup policy and I would like to convert it to Amanda. The
backup policy is:
One full backup - One time per month (without following
incremental backups)
One full backup - One time per week and incrementals backups
until the next week. For example,
Well, how big is that /var?
From yesterday's report:
isymmdb /var 0176096 176096 --0:59 2985.8 2:43
1079.7
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
Hi, I'm just starting to figure out Amanda and I have a few
questions, hopefully not too stupid.
My main goal is disaster recovery for a few servers, which
to me means having the most recent complete set of backups
off-site. I'm curious how that would work with Amanda
dump cycles. If, for
Rebecca Pakish Crum wrote:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
_www.iclear_ file://www.iclear / lev 0 FAILED [mesg read: Connection
timed out]
But from the previous mails we found out, ananda did send the estimate
before timing out.
So planner set all up to include 5.6 GByte from this host too.
Yes, but how big is it today? :)
Check in last night's amdump.N file (should be amdump.1) to
see how big
the estimate was.
got result for host isymmdb disk /var: 0 - 176050K, 1 - 11830K, -1 -
-1K
But from the previous mails we found out, ananda did send the
estimate
before timing out.
So planner set all up to include 5.6 GByte from this host
too. And that seems to be too much for 11976 Mbyte tape
capacity. So planner degraded one of the backups, and planned
an incremental one
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 11:58:28AM -0300, Roberto Samarone Araujo (RSA) wrote:
Hi,
I have a backup policy and I would like to convert it to Amanda. The
backup policy is:
One full backup - One time per month (without following
incremental backups)
Fine. Separate amanda
On Fri, 30 May 2003 at 10:38am, Rebecca Pakish Crum wrote
But from the previous mails we found out, ananda did send the
estimate
before timing out.
So planner set all up to include 5.6 GByte from this host
too. And that seems to be too much for 11976 Mbyte tape
capacity. So
Rebecca Pakish Crum wrote:
But from the previous mails we found out, ananda did send the
estimate
before timing out.
So planner set all up to include 5.6 GByte from this host
too. And that seems to be too much for 11976 Mbyte tape
capacity. So planner degraded one of the backups, and planned
Ah, but what Pual is saying is that they're related. If you
add up what
did get backed up plus the disk that failed with the data
timeout (but got
an estimate), you're at capacity. So the full of that /var
wouldn't fit,
so amanda degraded it.
Athe light is getting
But before timing out, planner got already an estimate. Look
in the amdump file. It took 5.6+ Gbyte in its estimate from
www.iclear.com plus the 5.9 Gbyte from the others plus 150 Mbyte from
/var. And that total amount is over your estimated tapecapacity. So
planner decided to switch one
Does Amanda 2.4.1p1 support excludes?
Can I use excludes with dump, or only gnutar?
--
David Olbersen
iGuard Engineer
11415 West Bernardo Court
San Diego, CA 92127
1-858-676-2277 x2152
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:47:17PM +0100, Kevin Passey enlightened us:
Ok my amandahosts file looks like this.
dilmom.as400resource.com amanda
*snip*
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: dilmom: [access as amanda not allowed from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Amanda users,
I have an IRIX system (Origin 300, 4 500Mhz processors) with a
few disks on it. One of these disks is relatively large, a RAID
array configured as a single partition of 0.866 TBytes.
The owner is looking into methods of backup and since we use amanda
almost universally...
On Fri, 30 May 2003 at 1:47pm, Brian Cuttler wrote
I have an IRIX system (Origin 300, 4 500Mhz processors) with a
few disks on it. One of these disks is relatively large, a RAID
array configured as a single partition of 0.866 TBytes.
Pah. I've got a 2TB partition, a 1TB, and a .5TB, with
Hi,
This is confusing me a bit, I hope someone hear has an idea of what might be happening.
I have been running an amanda server, backing itself up + one other amanda client
(jayhawker), for about a week now. It works great every night when I have the amdump
run. Yesterday I added a third
John,
Jon,
Gene,
Ivan,
Just a quick Thank You.
I've successfully run the new amanda build, 2.4.4 on my firewall
using the resticted ports to backup the 2nd client. Client and
server are both Solaris, drive is SDLT.
The problems I encounted where
1) the error in the changer-src/Makefile (next
I have a random problem like this as well running RH Linux. The client occasionally
fails amcheck in the afternoon. (Backups run at nite.) When I look at portland, the
client, I find the selfcheck task stuck and I am unable to kill it, even with kill
-9. See if you have the same problem.
Hi,
After use the suggestion, it worked but, there are still some problems:
I used the line:
amrecover Daily1 -s localhost
But, some erros occured:
501 No index record for host: server1.mydomain. Invalid?
Trying Server1.mydomain ...
Title: Super PornolaR
MutHis ResimLer ve
VideoLar
Lick To me
Inanilmaz Porno
Filmler
Title: Untitled
TR.Rehber 11 - 199$
6.850.000 Trk E-mail adresi ( llere,
I've been running amanda for several months with
backups to disk
(amanda version 2.4.3). Recently I've had backups
failing and can't
figure out what the problem may be.
Some details:
- Clients and backup server are Linux (RedHat 8)
- backup disk has plenty of free space (80 GB drive
with
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 11:32:54PM -0400, Chris Gordon wrote:
I've been running amanda for several months with backups to disk
(amanda version 2.4.3). Recently I've had backups failing and can't
figure out what the problem may be.
Some details:
- Clients and backup server are Linux
I thought that once I sent the mail so I added both it now looks like
dilmom.as400resource.com amanda
dilmom amanda
Still no Joy !!
Thanks for your reply anyway.
Regards
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hyclak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 May 2003 17:09
To: Amanda (E-mail)
On Saturday 31 May 2003 04:12, Kevin Passey wrote:
I thought that once I sent the mail so I added both it now looks
like
dilmom.as400resource.com amanda
dilmom amanda
Still no Joy !!
Are the perms 0600, and its owned by amanda?
--
Cheers, Gene
AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I thought that once I sent the mail so I added both it now looks like
dilmom.as400resource.com amanda
dilmom amanda
Still no Joy !!
Thanks for your reply anyway.
Regards
Kevin
-Original Message-
*snip*
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
On Saturday 31 May 2003 04:40, Wojciech Jedliczka wrote:
Hi,
I thought that once I sent the mail so I added both it now looks
like
dilmom.as400resource.com amanda
dilmom amanda
Still no Joy !!
Thanks for your reply anyway.
Regards
Kevin
-Original Message-
*snip*
Amanda
36 matches
Mail list logo
