Hi all!
I experience quite a strange problem with Amanda on Cygwin: I do not get the index
results of dumps. The backups go well (I can amrestore them without error) but the
indexes are not generated (the index files on the server are 0 byte...) so I cannot
amrecover them.
This is not a
Hi Gene
thanks for the reply.
the lo interface is up with the 127.0.0.1 ip.
The amandahost files is correct and I am really stuck on what is broken.
I have posted a printout of the permissions of my directory incase something
in debian linux is not kosher.
Also the clients the redhat backup
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Stupid question, how smart is the rait driver for disk ?
If you put the spool area on the output disk will it juggle
the space ok ? Will it know to move the file from one directory
to another (move the file pointer # mv perhaps) rather than
having to copy all the bits and
Ted Cabeen wrote:
Ahh. So without a holding disk, amanda will only dump one filesystem
at a time. Got it. Thanks.
How many clients is lots?
It's enough to have one slow client, and 1 or more other systems,
and the parallelism of amanda will dump the slow client in parallel
to the rest. That's
Title: Her yastan bay ve bayanlar icin
Her yastan bay ve bayanlar icin:
CiNSEL SORUNLARINIZA
ARTIK SON!
Kalici ve
Kesin Cozumler
.
* Ereksiyon Olamama ve
Ereksiyonu Koruyamama
*
Andy Howell wrote:
ln -s '/cygdrive/c/Documents and Settings' /cygdrive/c/DocsAndSettings
did the trick. Recovery works fine as well. Now all I have to do is
figure out some permission problems with some NTUSER.DAT and related
files, and I'll be all set.
Not possible; windows keep these
Hi JC,
in a previous post I've reported the same problem in my amanda
installation. I've 2.4.4 client 2.4.4 server.
No one replied so it seems that only the two of us have this problem.
I hope to see someone else.
Stefano Coletta
http://www.mindcreations.com
JC Simonetti wrote:
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 01:53, Mike Eldridge wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 05:31:20PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
There has to be some reason the services won't start, so please
post an 'ls -l' of the /usr/local/libexec directory. Also an
'ls -l' of the amanda src directory, and a 'cat'
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 02:31, Joseph Sirucka wrote:
Hi Gene
thanks for the reply.
the lo interface is up with the 127.0.0.1 ip.
The amandahost files is correct and I am really stuck on what is
broken.
I have posted a printout of the permissions of my directory incase
something in debian
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
When I did an amdump my_conf, I have a data timeout failed
Here it is my config file :
fext01ft/home/ftp/unix_accounts comp-serveur-tar
fext01ft/etccomp-serveur-tar
After investigation on the client, I looked in the sendsize file
Hi!
Concerning the backup of the Windows Hives, I've made a brainstorm using MS
documentation (ouch my head). So this is the result.
The Windows Hives are composed of many files:
_ %windir%\system32\cache\* for the system hives
_ ~user\ntuser.dat for the user hive
The system hives are always
Action Taken:
The attachment was quarantined from the message and replaced with a text
file informing the recipient of the action taken.
To:
Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
JC Simonetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Action Taken:
The attachment was quarantined from the message and replaced with a text
file informing the recipient of the action taken.
To:
Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
JC Simonetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Just for those that do not know it yet...
There is a new variant of Bugbear around since last week. I already
received two messages through the amanda mailing list with the virus.
The last one was probably from someone who got infected the first time.
Update your virus signatures please, or don't
Hello,
I found in this log file an error message of sed.
sendbackup: debug 1 pid 2208 ruid 33 euid 33: start at Wed Jun 11 14:34:40 2003
/usr/local/amanda/libexec/sendbackup: version 2.4.4
parsed request as: program `GNUTAR'
disk `/home/ftp/unix_accounts'
JC Simonetti wrote:
Thus there is only one way to backup the loaded hives (and only one to restore
them): using 2 Windows programs available in the Windows Resource Kit:
_ regback.exe
_ regrest.exe
I cannot join them to this mail since they are not free, you will have to buy
the Resource Kit to
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 08:55, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Just for those that do not know it yet...
There is a new variant of Bugbear around since last week. I already
received two messages through the amanda mailing list with the
virus. The last one was probably from someone who got infected the
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:48:35 -0400 (EDT)
barryc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JC Simonetti wrote:
Thus there is only one way to backup the loaded hives (and only one to restore
them): using 2 Windows programs available in the Windows Resource Kit:
_ regback.exe
_ regrest.exe
I cannot join them
Right, right...
Would be difficult for me to be infected by Windows viruses, since the OS on my
personal computer (the one I'm using right now to send this email) is based on a
2.4.19 linux kernel :-)
But it is also right i should have tar'ed my attachments since I know that Outlook and
maybe
Sorry guys, I would have been aware that Outlook and other Exchange softwares would be
afraid of my previous attachments since they were 2 .bat files...
So in case of someone could not get them and would have to get them, I've tar'ed and
reattached them here, just in case.
No, they are not
Gene Heskett wrote:
Somewhat interesting Paul, I got the attachments from JC here, and
they were not impeded by something called GroupShield. I looked them
over with kwrite and they looked like the real thing. No new bugbear
virii in them, nor any copyright/license notices.
No, those were not
Oh... It seems that tar files are also refused by Norton Antivirus.
At this point I won't rename my files with txt or png extension or anything that
could go through your AV, and/or tar/gzip/dd them, I give up. Sorry... Consider
revising your antivirus parameters, guys...
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003
i configured chg-zd-mtx, it works ok, besides that does not reall all
parameters from the config file
some parameters are read an some not, strange.
i then modified the cgh-zd-mtx directly and it works ok, but it would be
nicer if it reads the config file
properly.
regards,
gregor
Server - Solaris 8
Client - Red Hat Linux 7.2
When I run amcheck -cl normal
I get the following back from the linux client:
ERROR: /dev/hda1 selftest does not support device
ERROR: /dev/hda1 sendbackup does not support device
.
.
. for each disk partition
ERROR: [BOGUS REQUEST PACKET]
Any
ext3 and tar
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:16:35 -0400 Bill Nolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Server - Solaris 8 Client - Red Hat Linux 7.2
When I run amcheck -cl normal
I get the following back from the linux client:
ERROR: /dev/hda1 selftest does not
Bill Nolf wrote:
ext3 and tar
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:16:35 -0400 Bill Nolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Server - Solaris 8 Client - Red Hat Linux 7.2
When I run amcheck -cl normal
I get the following back from the linux client:
ERROR: /dev/hda1 selftest does not
--On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:32:36 -0400 Bill Nolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext3 and tar
Tar does filesystem-level backup, dump deals with devices. Try
changing your disklist entry to / (or whatever /dev/hda1 is
mounted as).
Frank
Server - Solaris 8 Client - Red Hat Linux 7.2
Martin, Jeremy wrote:
I'm not using amanda to back up any Windows boxes, but on some of our
Windows boxes that do need backed up, using NovaNet Web Backup which
does not support backing up the Sytem State like Backup Exec does, I
just use the built in Backup tool to do this. Start / Programs /
That was it. I had diskname and diskdevice screwed up.
thanks
Frank Smith wrote:
--On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:32:36 -0400 Bill Nolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext3 and tar
Tar does filesystem-level backup, dump deals with devices. Try
changing your disklist entry
I'm about to start setting up Amanda for my LAN, but I'm not sure
what version to go with. I want something stable, but I would
also like to have the option of using RAIT and file: backups,
which I understand to be relatively new features. Should I stick
with the 2.4.4 release from the web site,
in ideal environment you could boot your PC remotly with network boot, that
boots partimage
create a remote disk image and back this file with amanda.
what do you think?
regards,
gregor
Hi Bruce,
Use the latest snapshot, it contains mosly bug fix since 2.4.4.
I will release it as 2.4.4p1 before the end of the month.
Jean-Louis
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:10:43AM -0700, Bruce Fletcher wrote:
I'm about to start setting up Amanda for my LAN, but I'm not sure
what version to go
Searching And Still Haven't Found A That Someone Special?
Don't spend another day alone, take your first step towards a better life.
Visit Us Here And Choose The Woman You'd Like Meet
You can browse through our database of pictures and bio's of beautiful Russian womenlooking for a western man
Hi,
I have a problem with amverify. Or more correctly, I don't quite see why I
get the output I do:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ amverify bertha-us
No tape changer...
Tape device is /dev/nst0...
Verify summary to amanda
Defects file is /tmp/amanda/amverify.28777/defects
amverify bertha-us
Wed Jun
35 matches
Mail list logo
