Re: TCP Port Usage

2004-04-07 Thread Christoph Scheeder
Hi, AFAIK the portrange settings have to be applied identically at the server and the client. You have recompiled the client with the same settings for portrange, correct? Christoph Dean Pullen schrieb: Hi all. I have compiled Amanda using the following options: ./configure

amrecover

2004-04-07 Thread pascal thomas
What have I done wrong in this case? [EMAIL PROTECTED] amanda]# su - [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# amrecover tagesbackup AMRECOVER Version 2.4.3. Contacting server on localhost ... 220 amd450 AMANDA index server (2.4.3) ready. 500 Access not allowed: [access as amanda not allowed from [EMAIL

RE: TCP Port Usage

2004-04-07 Thread Dean Pullen
Hm I certainly presumed I had (did it a while back). I will go back and ensure I have. -Original Message- From: Christoph Scheeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 April 2004 07:00 To: Dean Pullen Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCP Port Usage Hi, AFAIK the portrange settings have

Re: amrecover

2004-04-07 Thread Christoph Scheeder
Hi, you are missing the line amd450 root in your .amandahosts file. Christoph pascal thomas schrieb: What have I done wrong in this case? [EMAIL PROTECTED] amanda]# su - [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# amrecover tagesbackup AMRECOVER Version 2.4.3. Contacting server on localhost ... 220 amd450 AMANDA

Re: amrecover

2004-04-07 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 03:40, pascal thomas wrote: What have I done wrong in this case? [EMAIL PROTECTED] amanda]# su - [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# amrecover tagesbackup AMRECOVER Version 2.4.3. Contacting server on localhost ... 220 amd450 AMANDA index server (2.4.3) ready. 500 Access not

Clean drive

2004-04-07 Thread Tom Brown
I came to my weekly autoloader change and noticed 'Clean Required' on the panel. The changer is a 8 slot DDS4 changer and slot 8 houses the cleaning tape. I ran $ amtape clean and got amtape: device 8 not clean: Cleaning Cartridge Installed and Ejected I'm not actually there now, did

AIT-2

2004-04-07 Thread Dege, Robert C.
Hi, I'm currently having problems restoring files from my amanda backup system. I am able to narrow the problem down to my AIT-2 tape drive. If I restore files from amanda backups that are still on the holding disk, I have a successful restore. If I restore files from any of the AIT-2

Re: AIT-2

2004-04-07 Thread Frank Smith
--On Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:25:10 -0700 Dege, Robert C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm currently having problems restoring files from my amanda backup system. I am able to narrow the problem down to my AIT-2 tape drive. If I restore files from amanda backups that are still on

Re: AIT-2

2004-04-07 Thread Paul Bijnens
Dege, Robert C. wrote: I'm currently having problems restoring files from my amanda backup system. I am able to narrow the problem down to my AIT-2 tape drive. If I restore files from amanda backups that are still on the holding disk, I have a successful restore. If I restore files from any of

Re: AIT-2

2004-04-07 Thread Christopher Linn
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 11:25:10AM -0700, Dege, Robert C. wrote: Hi, I'm currently having problems restoring files from my amanda backup system. I am able to narrow the problem down to my AIT-2 tape drive. If I restore files from amanda backups that are still on the holding disk, I

RE: AIT-2

2004-04-07 Thread Dege, Robert C.
On my SDX-500 AIT-2 drives, I have 1-7 off and 8 on. The documentation says switches 1-4 6 are reserved and should be off, 5 is termination power, 7 is HW compression (0-off,1-on), and 8 is SW compression control (0 lets host enable/disable compression, 1 disables host control). I

RE: AIT-2

2004-04-07 Thread Frank Smith
--On Wednesday, April 07, 2004 13:08:10 -0700 Dege, Robert C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On my SDX-500 AIT-2 drives, I have 1-7 off and 8 on. The documentation says switches 1-4 6 are reserved and should be off, 5 is termination power, 7 is HW compression (0-off,1-on), and 8 is SW

RE: AIT-2

2004-04-07 Thread Dege, Robert C.
what platform/OS is your tapehost? AMD System, running RedHat 9.0. I'm using a stock 2.4.22 kernel. did you also modify your SCSI tape driver config file (/kernel/drv/st.conf on Solaris) so the driver can know about particular capabilities of the tapedrive? I didn't modify any kernel

RE: AIT-2

2004-04-07 Thread Dege, Robert C.
Are you recovering on the client or the server? Are you recovering from more than one DLE? Perhaps the data was compressed on a box using a compression program not available on the box doing the recover. Frank The system is both the client the server. I checked the config file in the

RE: AIT-2

2004-04-07 Thread Dege, Robert C.
Jay, thanks for all this info. I am able to run these dd commands successfully. So I'm beginning to think that amanda is the source of the problem. However, before I go any further, I'm extracting the data from the tapeimages to ensure that tar doesn't crash. -Rob -Original

Re: AIT-2

2004-04-07 Thread Christopher Linn
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:51:08PM -0700, Dege, Robert C. wrote: what platform/OS is your tapehost? AMD System, running RedHat 9.0. I'm using a stock 2.4.22 kernel. OK. i've never run a linux amanda server/tapehost. did you also modify your SCSI tape driver config file

Re: AIT-2

2004-04-07 Thread Eric Siegerman
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:44:10PM -0700, Dege, Robert C. wrote: thanks for all this info. I am able to run these dd commands successfully. So I'm beginning to think that amanda is the source of the problem. Here's a stab-in-the-dark sort of guess: maybe amrecover is using a different gtar

The find right tape function is now broken

2004-04-07 Thread Gene Heskett
: slot 3: tape_rdlabel: tape open: /dev/nst0: Input/output error amcheck-server: slot 0: date 20040405 label DailySet1-10 (active tape) amcheck-server: slot 1: date 20040406 label DailySet1-11 (active tape) amcheck-server: slot 2: date 20040407 label DailySet1-12 (active tape) ERROR: label DailySet1