Hi, Glenn,
on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 06:51 you wrote to amanda-users:
GE> Jon implied that hdparm may be just kidding about this. hdparm -Tt gives
GE> the following:
GE>
GE> /dev/hda:
GE> Timing buffer-cache reads: 2800 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1399.51 MB/sec
GE> Timing buffered disk
Hi, Stefan G. Weichinger,
on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 09:12 you wrote to amanda-users:
SGW> Hi, Glenn,
SGW> on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 06:51 you wrote to amanda-users:
GE>> I looked at another system: an old Dell server downstairs with a Maxtor
GE>> PCI IDE card and a 2 or 3 year old M
Glenn English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 10:59, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
> > I doubt there is any tapedrive that is "too fast" for your
> > disk drives.
>
> I thought so too. But when dump is running from one disk to the other,
> it reports speeds about 20% higher (~10MB/s)
Glen
I'd check the logic in the kernel code that checks for 80 way cables etc
etc. When I last looked at 2.4.19 it was doing some weird stuff - do the
checks then reset the flag where the bit table for the capabilities of
the drive is set. As opposed to reset, then do the checks!
I know you sai
Hello again,
i have just reciompiled amanda using a patch to force the use of bzip2
instead of gzip, i have recreated the tapes, deleted all the logs and
database files.
I put the no-reuse option on all the tapes using amadmin, but now all
the backups are refused because amanda expects a new
Javier Sanchez wrote:
I put the no-reuse option on all the tapes using amadmin, but now all
the backups are refused because amanda expects a new tape, did i miss
something to reset ??
'no-reuse' is exaclty what amanda will do with the tapes:
she will refuse to write on them.
Amanda needs (v)tapes t
So let see if i understood all correctly .-)
I created 10 vtapes on a usb disk, as soon as the tapes gets full i must
put the tape in no-reuse and add another tape to the tapelist ??
How can i force amanda not to use another tape if theres free space on
the actual tape ??
Cheers
And again thank
Javier Sanchez wrote:
I created 10 vtapes on a usb disk, as soon as the tapes gets full i must
put the tape in no-reuse and add another tape to the tapelist ??
...as soon as the tapes are WRITTEN TO...
The number of "reusable" tapes needs to be >= tapecycle parameter.
As long as this condition hold
On Thursday 03 June 2004 03:26, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>Hi, Stefan G. Weichinger,
>
>on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 09:12 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
>SGW> Hi, Glenn,
>
>SGW> on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 06:51 you wrote to
> amanda-users:
>
>GE>> I looked at another system: an old Dell se
Hi everyone,
I've successfully setup Amanda to backup our internal servers. Our setup
is the classic DMZ setup:
inner network => inner-firewall => DMZ => outer-firewall => internet
The Backup Server is in the inner network. The firewalls are both running
debian 2.2 potato with ipchains (unfortun
I create one test folder named /backup3/teste,
inside this folder i put one file with 5 gb size, today i make
one backup this folder ..
my disklist is:
nameofserver /backup3/teste
root-tar
The backup working fine, but when i go to this
folder, move the file to see recover working
and i r
Tobias wrote:
amcheck complains with "port (insert-highport-here) is not secure". I've
read the amanda FAQs but the answer given to this problem didn't help because
I haven't installed the firewalls and am by far no firewall magician. Why
does amanda receive the highport which should have been mapp
Zitat von Paul Bijnens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> in common-src/security.c:
> Comment it out.
> The added benefit of this test is not as strong as it used to be, in
> these days where everybody can be root on his PC, and connect from a
> reserved (<1024) port.
thanks for your help. I just tried what
Hi, Tobias,
on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 15:42 you wrote to amanda-users:
T> Zitat von Paul Bijnens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> in common-src/security.c:
>> Comment it out.
>> The added benefit of this test is not as strong as it used to be, in
>> these days where everybody can be root on his PC,
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Justin Gombos wrote:
> [anti_ooo.msg file]
>
> My scripts have detected that you posted an out of office reply to a
> public forum. Please control your auto-responder.
>
> If you are receiving this in error, I apologize; please disregard it.
At the risk of prolonging t
Hi all,
im having problems building amanda on a red hat advance server 2.1,
heres the output, any hits ???
source='alloc.c' object='alloc.lo' libtool=yes \
depfile='.deps/alloc.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/alloc.TPlo' \
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../config/depcomp \
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -D
Javier Sanchez wrote:
im having problems building amanda on a red hat advance server 2.1,
heres the output, any hits ???
No idea. Never seen.
But just verifying: you did do "make distclean" before
you did "./configure " ?
--
Paul Bijnens, XplanationTel +32 16 397.5
* Mitch Collinsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-03 08:32]:
>
> At the risk of prolonging this thread even further, it does seem
> incongruous for an auto-responder script aimed as mis-behaving
> auto-responders to request that if it itself mis-behaves, the
> recipient should please disregard.
I
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 07:10, Tobias wrote:
> The Backup Server is in the inner network. The firewalls are both running
> debian 2.2 potato with ipchains (unfortunately kernel doesn't seem to have
> port-forwarding capabilities and I don't like to roll my own if there is
> another way ...).
It's a
Hi,
on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 16:13 I wrote to amanda-users:
SGW> The options I have pasted from that old mail and since then in my
SGW> setup:
SGW> ./configure --with-tcpportrange=5,50040 --with-udpportrange=890,899
SGW> Have a start at
SGW>
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-u
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 01:12, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Getting away from AMANDA-topics:
>
> You should get your IDE-setup straight.
That does seem to be the root of the problem.
> A main point is the bus-mastering. It is also very important to
> performance which device is the master and wh
Hi, Glenn,
on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 19:18 you wrote to amanda-users:
GE> And I thought that a & b were controller #1, c & d were #2. I'm using
GE> the controller(s) on the Intel motherboard.
Don't mix up controllers with channels:
Your controller supports two channels, which are called p
Does anyone know of a book or some online docs that explain in detail how AMANDA works, how to use all of its tools, and how to optimize / tweak it for a particular environment? The online chapter of Unix Backup and Recovery doesn't quite do it for me. Thx!
Hi, Kris,
on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 21:46 you wrote to amanda-users:
KV> Does anyone know of a book or some online docs that explain
KV> in detail how AMANDA works, how to use all of its tools, and how
KV> to optimize / tweak it for a particular environment? The online
KV> chapter of Unix B
Stefan G. Weichinger a e'crit:
> There is no such thing as "The Official AMANDA HOWTO And Reference
> Guide".
Is anybody working on it?
Hi, Ivan,
on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 22:52 you wrote to amanda-users:
IP> Stefan G. Weichinger a e'crit:
>> There is no such thing as "The Official AMANDA HOWTO And Reference
>> Guide".
IP> Is anybody working on it?
I don't know of any current project, no.
But I think about doing it mysel
On Thursday 03 June 2004 17:33, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>Hi, Ivan,
>
>on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 22:52 you wrote to amanda-users:
>
>IP> Stefan G. Weichinger a e'crit:
>>> There is no such thing as "The Official AMANDA HOWTO And
>>> Reference Guide".
>
>IP> Is anybody working on it?
>
>I d
Hi, Gene Heskett,
on Donnerstag, 03. Juni 2004 at 23:52 you wrote to amanda-users:
GH> There was at one time a site called frankenlinux.something that had a
GH> somewhat expanded set of manpages/docs. I used them to get started
GH> with years ago. They might be somewhat dated in that any new st
28 matches
Mail list logo
